Cargando…

Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

AIM: To systematically review the status of self‐care in patients with heart failure through the Self‐Care of Heart Failure Index scale. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. METHODS: Following national and international databases were searched to retrieve eligible studies: PubMed, Web of S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aghajanloo, Ali, Negarandeh, Reza, Janani, Leila, Tanha, Kiarash, Hoseini‐Esfidarjani, Sara‐Sadat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.805
_version_ 1783738331790573568
author Aghajanloo, Ali
Negarandeh, Reza
Janani, Leila
Tanha, Kiarash
Hoseini‐Esfidarjani, Sara‐Sadat
author_facet Aghajanloo, Ali
Negarandeh, Reza
Janani, Leila
Tanha, Kiarash
Hoseini‐Esfidarjani, Sara‐Sadat
author_sort Aghajanloo, Ali
collection PubMed
description AIM: To systematically review the status of self‐care in patients with heart failure through the Self‐Care of Heart Failure Index scale. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. METHODS: Following national and international databases were searched to retrieve eligible studies: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, Scientific Information Database and Magiran. The studies were screened and selected by two researchers. Data analysed through the random‐effects model, and the I (2) index was used to assess heterogeneity. Stata software version 12.0 was used for analysis. The PRISMA statement was used to report systematic review and meta‐analysis. RESULTS: Of the 5,953 articles initially identified, 39 studies were included. The average score was estimated at 58.16 (CI: 54.39–61.94) for self‐care maintenance, 53.11 (CI: 49.17–57.05) for self‐care management and 58.66 (CI: 54.32–63.00) for self‐care confidence. Despite the high heterogeneity of the studies, the results indicated that self‐care practice is inadequate in all the three dimensions of self‐care (maintenance, management and confidence).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8363344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83633442021-08-23 Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis Aghajanloo, Ali Negarandeh, Reza Janani, Leila Tanha, Kiarash Hoseini‐Esfidarjani, Sara‐Sadat Nurs Open Review Articles AIM: To systematically review the status of self‐care in patients with heart failure through the Self‐Care of Heart Failure Index scale. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. METHODS: Following national and international databases were searched to retrieve eligible studies: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, Scientific Information Database and Magiran. The studies were screened and selected by two researchers. Data analysed through the random‐effects model, and the I (2) index was used to assess heterogeneity. Stata software version 12.0 was used for analysis. The PRISMA statement was used to report systematic review and meta‐analysis. RESULTS: Of the 5,953 articles initially identified, 39 studies were included. The average score was estimated at 58.16 (CI: 54.39–61.94) for self‐care maintenance, 53.11 (CI: 49.17–57.05) for self‐care management and 58.66 (CI: 54.32–63.00) for self‐care confidence. Despite the high heterogeneity of the studies, the results indicated that self‐care practice is inadequate in all the three dimensions of self‐care (maintenance, management and confidence). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8363344/ /pubmed/33619877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.805 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Aghajanloo, Ali
Negarandeh, Reza
Janani, Leila
Tanha, Kiarash
Hoseini‐Esfidarjani, Sara‐Sadat
Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort self‐care status in patients with heart failure: systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.805
work_keys_str_mv AT aghajanlooali selfcarestatusinpatientswithheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT negarandehreza selfcarestatusinpatientswithheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jananileila selfcarestatusinpatientswithheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tanhakiarash selfcarestatusinpatientswithheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hoseiniesfidarjanisarasadat selfcarestatusinpatientswithheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis