Cargando…
Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
AIM: To systematically review the status of self‐care in patients with heart failure through the Self‐Care of Heart Failure Index scale. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. METHODS: Following national and international databases were searched to retrieve eligible studies: PubMed, Web of S...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.805 |
_version_ | 1783738331790573568 |
---|---|
author | Aghajanloo, Ali Negarandeh, Reza Janani, Leila Tanha, Kiarash Hoseini‐Esfidarjani, Sara‐Sadat |
author_facet | Aghajanloo, Ali Negarandeh, Reza Janani, Leila Tanha, Kiarash Hoseini‐Esfidarjani, Sara‐Sadat |
author_sort | Aghajanloo, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To systematically review the status of self‐care in patients with heart failure through the Self‐Care of Heart Failure Index scale. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. METHODS: Following national and international databases were searched to retrieve eligible studies: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, Scientific Information Database and Magiran. The studies were screened and selected by two researchers. Data analysed through the random‐effects model, and the I (2) index was used to assess heterogeneity. Stata software version 12.0 was used for analysis. The PRISMA statement was used to report systematic review and meta‐analysis. RESULTS: Of the 5,953 articles initially identified, 39 studies were included. The average score was estimated at 58.16 (CI: 54.39–61.94) for self‐care maintenance, 53.11 (CI: 49.17–57.05) for self‐care management and 58.66 (CI: 54.32–63.00) for self‐care confidence. Despite the high heterogeneity of the studies, the results indicated that self‐care practice is inadequate in all the three dimensions of self‐care (maintenance, management and confidence). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8363344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83633442021-08-23 Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis Aghajanloo, Ali Negarandeh, Reza Janani, Leila Tanha, Kiarash Hoseini‐Esfidarjani, Sara‐Sadat Nurs Open Review Articles AIM: To systematically review the status of self‐care in patients with heart failure through the Self‐Care of Heart Failure Index scale. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. METHODS: Following national and international databases were searched to retrieve eligible studies: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, Scientific Information Database and Magiran. The studies were screened and selected by two researchers. Data analysed through the random‐effects model, and the I (2) index was used to assess heterogeneity. Stata software version 12.0 was used for analysis. The PRISMA statement was used to report systematic review and meta‐analysis. RESULTS: Of the 5,953 articles initially identified, 39 studies were included. The average score was estimated at 58.16 (CI: 54.39–61.94) for self‐care maintenance, 53.11 (CI: 49.17–57.05) for self‐care management and 58.66 (CI: 54.32–63.00) for self‐care confidence. Despite the high heterogeneity of the studies, the results indicated that self‐care practice is inadequate in all the three dimensions of self‐care (maintenance, management and confidence). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8363344/ /pubmed/33619877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.805 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Aghajanloo, Ali Negarandeh, Reza Janani, Leila Tanha, Kiarash Hoseini‐Esfidarjani, Sara‐Sadat Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Self‐care status in patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | self‐care status in patients with heart failure: systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.805 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aghajanlooali selfcarestatusinpatientswithheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT negarandehreza selfcarestatusinpatientswithheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jananileila selfcarestatusinpatientswithheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tanhakiarash selfcarestatusinpatientswithheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hoseiniesfidarjanisarasadat selfcarestatusinpatientswithheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |