Cargando…

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale

AIM: The aim of this study is to develop and psychometrically test the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale. DESIGN: The study design was non‐experimental and cross‐sectional. METHOD: The evaluation followed classical test theory, and the instrument was evaluated regarding reliability, construct validi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsson, Fanny, Engström, Åsa, Strömbäck, Ulrica, Gustafsson, Silje
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34291891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1003
_version_ 1783738347613585408
author Larsson, Fanny
Engström, Åsa
Strömbäck, Ulrica
Gustafsson, Silje
author_facet Larsson, Fanny
Engström, Åsa
Strömbäck, Ulrica
Gustafsson, Silje
author_sort Larsson, Fanny
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study is to develop and psychometrically test the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale. DESIGN: The study design was non‐experimental and cross‐sectional. METHOD: The evaluation followed classical test theory, and the instrument was evaluated regarding reliability, construct validity and content validity. For the reliability analysis, a postal questionnaire consisting of the 16 items of the scale was dispatched in March 2020 to a consecutive sample (N = 242) of patients who had undergone hip or knee replacement arthroplasties with regional anaesthesia. Five experts in nursing care evaluated the content validity of the scale. RESULT: Internal consistency was 0.841. Three items were excluded due to deficits in reliability, resulting in a 13‐item scale. A principal component analysis revealed a two‐dimensional solution, labelled internal and external aspects of feeling safe. Two items were rephrased to improve clarity and content validity. The average content validity for the scale was 0.88, indicating acceptable content validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8363413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83634132021-08-23 Development and psychometric evaluation of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale Larsson, Fanny Engström, Åsa Strömbäck, Ulrica Gustafsson, Silje Nurs Open Research Articles AIM: The aim of this study is to develop and psychometrically test the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale. DESIGN: The study design was non‐experimental and cross‐sectional. METHOD: The evaluation followed classical test theory, and the instrument was evaluated regarding reliability, construct validity and content validity. For the reliability analysis, a postal questionnaire consisting of the 16 items of the scale was dispatched in March 2020 to a consecutive sample (N = 242) of patients who had undergone hip or knee replacement arthroplasties with regional anaesthesia. Five experts in nursing care evaluated the content validity of the scale. RESULT: Internal consistency was 0.841. Three items were excluded due to deficits in reliability, resulting in a 13‐item scale. A principal component analysis revealed a two‐dimensional solution, labelled internal and external aspects of feeling safe. Two items were rephrased to improve clarity and content validity. The average content validity for the scale was 0.88, indicating acceptable content validity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8363413/ /pubmed/34291891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1003 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Larsson, Fanny
Engström, Åsa
Strömbäck, Ulrica
Gustafsson, Silje
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale
title Development and psychometric evaluation of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale
title_full Development and psychometric evaluation of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale
title_fullStr Development and psychometric evaluation of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale
title_full_unstemmed Development and psychometric evaluation of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale
title_short Development and psychometric evaluation of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale
title_sort development and psychometric evaluation of the feeling safe during surgery scale
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34291891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1003
work_keys_str_mv AT larssonfanny developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefeelingsafeduringsurgeryscale
AT engstromasa developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefeelingsafeduringsurgeryscale
AT strombackulrica developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefeelingsafeduringsurgeryscale
AT gustafssonsilje developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefeelingsafeduringsurgeryscale