Cargando…

Integration of transbronchial cryobiopsy into multidisciplinary board decision: a single center analysis of one hundred consecutive patients with interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND: Transbronchial cryobiopsy in the evaluation of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is expected to reduce the need for surgical lung biopsy (SLB). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of cryobiopsy in combination with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), radiologic and clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hostettler, Katrin E., Tamm, Michael, Bubendorf, Lukas, Grendelmeier, Peter, Jahn, Kathleen, Stolz, Daiana, Bremerich, Jens, Prince, Spasenija Savic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34391420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01821-w
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Transbronchial cryobiopsy in the evaluation of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is expected to reduce the need for surgical lung biopsy (SLB). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of cryobiopsy in combination with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), radiologic and clinical data in patients with ILD. METHODS: Between 08/15 and 01/20 patients with ILD underwent cryobiopsy if they: did not have (i) an usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-pattern on CT, (ii) predominant ground-glass opacities suggesting alveolitis, (iii) findings suggestive of sarcoidosis on CT, or if they had (i) a CT showing UIP-pattern, but had findings suggesting alternative diagnosis than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), or (ii) had previous non-diagnostic conventional transbronchial forceps biopsy. Histological findings were integrated into the multidisciplinary team discussion (MDTD) and a diagnostic consensus was sought. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent cryobiopsy. In 88/100 patients, cryobiopsy was representative with diagnostic findings in 45/88 and non-specific histological findings in 43/88 patients. In 25/43 with non-specific findings, a consensus diagnosis was reached after MDTD integrating BAL, radiologic and clinical data; eight of the remaining 18 patients with non-specific findings were referred to SLB. In 12/100 patients cryobiopsy was not representative and three of these patients were also referred to SLB. In 7/11 patients (64%) SLB was diagnostic. Complications of cryobiopsy included pneumothorax (14%) and locally controlled bleeding (24%). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic yield of cryobiopsy was 70%:45% of cryobiopsies were diagnostic based on histology alone and an additional 25% provided non-specific, but valuable findings allowing a consensus diagnosis after MDTD. Our data demonstrate that the diagnostic value of cryobiopsy is high if combined with BAL, radiologic and clinical data.