Cargando…

Thromboelastography parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection and predicting reimplantation timing

BACKGROUND: Coagulation-related biomarkers are drawing new attention in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The thromboelastography (TEG) assay provides a comprehensive assessment of blood coagulation; therefore, it could be a promising test for PJI. This study aims to assess the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Tao, Wang, Yi, Sun, Shui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34388995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04578-x
_version_ 1783738478044905472
author Yuan, Tao
Wang, Yi
Sun, Shui
author_facet Yuan, Tao
Wang, Yi
Sun, Shui
author_sort Yuan, Tao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coagulation-related biomarkers are drawing new attention in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The thromboelastography (TEG) assay provides a comprehensive assessment of blood coagulation; therefore, it could be a promising test for PJI. This study aims to assess the value of TEG in diagnosing PJI and to determine the clinical significance of TEG in analysing reimplantation timing for second-stage revision. METHODS: From October 2017 to September 2020, 62 patients who underwent revision arthroplasty were prospectively included. PJI was defined by the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, in which 23 patients were diagnosed with PJI (Group A), and the remaining 39 patients were included as having aseptic loosening (Group B). In group A, 17 patients completed a two-stage revision in our centre. C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), D-dimer, and TEG parameters (clotting time, α-angle, MA [maximum amplitude], amplitude at 30 min, and thrombodynamic potential index) were measured preoperatively in all included patients. In addition, receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of these biomarkers. RESULTS: ESR (area under curve [AUC], 0.953; sensitivity, 81.82; specificity, 94.87) performed best for PJI diagnosis, followed by MA (AUC, 0.895; sensitivity, 82.61; specificity, 97.44) and CRP (AUC, 0.893; sensitivity, 82.61; specificity, 94.74). When these biomarkers were combined in pairs, the diagnostic value improved compared with any individual biomarker. The overall success rate of the two-stage revision was 100%. Furthermore, ESR and MA were valuable in determining the time of reimplantation, and their values all decreased below the cut-off values before reimplantation. CONCLUSION: TEG could be a promising test in assisting PJI diagnosis, and a useful tool in judging the proper timing of reimplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8364122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83641222021-08-17 Thromboelastography parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection and predicting reimplantation timing Yuan, Tao Wang, Yi Sun, Shui BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Coagulation-related biomarkers are drawing new attention in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The thromboelastography (TEG) assay provides a comprehensive assessment of blood coagulation; therefore, it could be a promising test for PJI. This study aims to assess the value of TEG in diagnosing PJI and to determine the clinical significance of TEG in analysing reimplantation timing for second-stage revision. METHODS: From October 2017 to September 2020, 62 patients who underwent revision arthroplasty were prospectively included. PJI was defined by the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, in which 23 patients were diagnosed with PJI (Group A), and the remaining 39 patients were included as having aseptic loosening (Group B). In group A, 17 patients completed a two-stage revision in our centre. C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), D-dimer, and TEG parameters (clotting time, α-angle, MA [maximum amplitude], amplitude at 30 min, and thrombodynamic potential index) were measured preoperatively in all included patients. In addition, receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of these biomarkers. RESULTS: ESR (area under curve [AUC], 0.953; sensitivity, 81.82; specificity, 94.87) performed best for PJI diagnosis, followed by MA (AUC, 0.895; sensitivity, 82.61; specificity, 97.44) and CRP (AUC, 0.893; sensitivity, 82.61; specificity, 94.74). When these biomarkers were combined in pairs, the diagnostic value improved compared with any individual biomarker. The overall success rate of the two-stage revision was 100%. Furthermore, ESR and MA were valuable in determining the time of reimplantation, and their values all decreased below the cut-off values before reimplantation. CONCLUSION: TEG could be a promising test in assisting PJI diagnosis, and a useful tool in judging the proper timing of reimplantation. BioMed Central 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8364122/ /pubmed/34388995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04578-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yuan, Tao
Wang, Yi
Sun, Shui
Thromboelastography parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection and predicting reimplantation timing
title Thromboelastography parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection and predicting reimplantation timing
title_full Thromboelastography parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection and predicting reimplantation timing
title_fullStr Thromboelastography parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection and predicting reimplantation timing
title_full_unstemmed Thromboelastography parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection and predicting reimplantation timing
title_short Thromboelastography parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection and predicting reimplantation timing
title_sort thromboelastography parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection and predicting reimplantation timing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34388995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04578-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yuantao thromboelastographyparametersindiagnosingperiprostheticjointinfectionandpredictingreimplantationtiming
AT wangyi thromboelastographyparametersindiagnosingperiprostheticjointinfectionandpredictingreimplantationtiming
AT sunshui thromboelastographyparametersindiagnosingperiprostheticjointinfectionandpredictingreimplantationtiming