Cargando…

Knowledge‐based radiation treatment planning: A data‐driven method survey

This paper surveys the data‐driven dose prediction methods investigated for knowledge‐based planning (KBP) in the last decade. These methods were classified into two major categories—traditional KBP methods and deep‐learning (DL) methods—according to their techniques of utilizing previous knowledge....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Momin, Shadab, Fu, Yabo, Lei, Yang, Roper, Justin, Bradley, Jeffrey D., Curran, Walter J., Liu, Tian, Yang, Xiaofeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34231970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13337
_version_ 1783738496754647040
author Momin, Shadab
Fu, Yabo
Lei, Yang
Roper, Justin
Bradley, Jeffrey D.
Curran, Walter J.
Liu, Tian
Yang, Xiaofeng
author_facet Momin, Shadab
Fu, Yabo
Lei, Yang
Roper, Justin
Bradley, Jeffrey D.
Curran, Walter J.
Liu, Tian
Yang, Xiaofeng
author_sort Momin, Shadab
collection PubMed
description This paper surveys the data‐driven dose prediction methods investigated for knowledge‐based planning (KBP) in the last decade. These methods were classified into two major categories—traditional KBP methods and deep‐learning (DL) methods—according to their techniques of utilizing previous knowledge. Traditional KBP methods include studies that require geometric or anatomical features to either find the best‐matched case(s) from a repository of prior treatment plans or to build dose prediction models. DL methods include studies that train neural networks to make dose predictions. A comprehensive review of each category is presented, highlighting key features, methods, and their advancements over the years. We separated the cited works according to the framework and cancer site in each category. Finally, we briefly discuss the performance of both traditional KBP methods and DL methods, then discuss future trends of both data‐driven KBP methods to dose prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8364264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83642642021-08-23 Knowledge‐based radiation treatment planning: A data‐driven method survey Momin, Shadab Fu, Yabo Lei, Yang Roper, Justin Bradley, Jeffrey D. Curran, Walter J. Liu, Tian Yang, Xiaofeng J Appl Clin Med Phys Review Article This paper surveys the data‐driven dose prediction methods investigated for knowledge‐based planning (KBP) in the last decade. These methods were classified into two major categories—traditional KBP methods and deep‐learning (DL) methods—according to their techniques of utilizing previous knowledge. Traditional KBP methods include studies that require geometric or anatomical features to either find the best‐matched case(s) from a repository of prior treatment plans or to build dose prediction models. DL methods include studies that train neural networks to make dose predictions. A comprehensive review of each category is presented, highlighting key features, methods, and their advancements over the years. We separated the cited works according to the framework and cancer site in each category. Finally, we briefly discuss the performance of both traditional KBP methods and DL methods, then discuss future trends of both data‐driven KBP methods to dose prediction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8364264/ /pubmed/34231970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13337 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Momin, Shadab
Fu, Yabo
Lei, Yang
Roper, Justin
Bradley, Jeffrey D.
Curran, Walter J.
Liu, Tian
Yang, Xiaofeng
Knowledge‐based radiation treatment planning: A data‐driven method survey
title Knowledge‐based radiation treatment planning: A data‐driven method survey
title_full Knowledge‐based radiation treatment planning: A data‐driven method survey
title_fullStr Knowledge‐based radiation treatment planning: A data‐driven method survey
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge‐based radiation treatment planning: A data‐driven method survey
title_short Knowledge‐based radiation treatment planning: A data‐driven method survey
title_sort knowledge‐based radiation treatment planning: a data‐driven method survey
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34231970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13337
work_keys_str_mv AT mominshadab knowledgebasedradiationtreatmentplanningadatadrivenmethodsurvey
AT fuyabo knowledgebasedradiationtreatmentplanningadatadrivenmethodsurvey
AT leiyang knowledgebasedradiationtreatmentplanningadatadrivenmethodsurvey
AT roperjustin knowledgebasedradiationtreatmentplanningadatadrivenmethodsurvey
AT bradleyjeffreyd knowledgebasedradiationtreatmentplanningadatadrivenmethodsurvey
AT curranwalterj knowledgebasedradiationtreatmentplanningadatadrivenmethodsurvey
AT liutian knowledgebasedradiationtreatmentplanningadatadrivenmethodsurvey
AT yangxiaofeng knowledgebasedradiationtreatmentplanningadatadrivenmethodsurvey