Cargando…

Alert system for monitoring changes in patient anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer

The purpose of this study is to validate a previously developed algorithm for alerting clinicians when to consider re‐CT simulation due to changes in the patient's anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data were collected prospectively fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schaly, Bryan, Kempe, Jeff, Venkatesan, Varagur, Mitchell, Sylvia, Chen, Jeff
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34302421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13342
_version_ 1783738497676345344
author Schaly, Bryan
Kempe, Jeff
Venkatesan, Varagur
Mitchell, Sylvia
Chen, Jeff
author_facet Schaly, Bryan
Kempe, Jeff
Venkatesan, Varagur
Mitchell, Sylvia
Chen, Jeff
author_sort Schaly, Bryan
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to validate a previously developed algorithm for alerting clinicians when to consider re‐CT simulation due to changes in the patient's anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data were collected prospectively for 77 patients. Each CBCT was mathematically compared to a reference CBCT using the gamma index. We defined the match quality parameter (MQP) as an indicator of CBCT image similarity, where a negative MQP value indicates a poorer CBCT match than the match between the first two CBCT acquired during treatment. If three consecutive MQP values were below a chosen threshold, an “alert” is triggered to indicate action required, for example, possible re‐CT simulation. The timing of image review requests made by the radiation therapists and any re‐CT/re‐plan decisions were documented for each patient's treatment course. The MQP for each patient (including any re‐plans) was calculated in a manner that was blinded from the clinical process. The MQP as a function of fraction number was compared to actual clinical decisions in the treatment progress to evaluate alert system performance. There was a total of 93 plans (including re‐plans) with 34 positives (action required) and 59 negatives (no action required). The sensitivity of the alert system was 0.76 and the false positive rate was 0.37. Only 1 case out of the 34 positive cases would have been missed by both the alert system and our clinical process. Despite the false negatives and false positives, analysis of the timing of alert triggers showed that the alert system could have resulted in seven fewer clinical misses. The alert system has the potential to be a valuable tool to complement human judgment and to provide a quality assurance safeguard to help improve the delivery of radiation treatment of head and neck cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8364268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83642682021-08-23 Alert system for monitoring changes in patient anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer Schaly, Bryan Kempe, Jeff Venkatesan, Varagur Mitchell, Sylvia Chen, Jeff J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study is to validate a previously developed algorithm for alerting clinicians when to consider re‐CT simulation due to changes in the patient's anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data were collected prospectively for 77 patients. Each CBCT was mathematically compared to a reference CBCT using the gamma index. We defined the match quality parameter (MQP) as an indicator of CBCT image similarity, where a negative MQP value indicates a poorer CBCT match than the match between the first two CBCT acquired during treatment. If three consecutive MQP values were below a chosen threshold, an “alert” is triggered to indicate action required, for example, possible re‐CT simulation. The timing of image review requests made by the radiation therapists and any re‐CT/re‐plan decisions were documented for each patient's treatment course. The MQP for each patient (including any re‐plans) was calculated in a manner that was blinded from the clinical process. The MQP as a function of fraction number was compared to actual clinical decisions in the treatment progress to evaluate alert system performance. There was a total of 93 plans (including re‐plans) with 34 positives (action required) and 59 negatives (no action required). The sensitivity of the alert system was 0.76 and the false positive rate was 0.37. Only 1 case out of the 34 positive cases would have been missed by both the alert system and our clinical process. Despite the false negatives and false positives, analysis of the timing of alert triggers showed that the alert system could have resulted in seven fewer clinical misses. The alert system has the potential to be a valuable tool to complement human judgment and to provide a quality assurance safeguard to help improve the delivery of radiation treatment of head and neck cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8364268/ /pubmed/34302421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13342 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Schaly, Bryan
Kempe, Jeff
Venkatesan, Varagur
Mitchell, Sylvia
Chen, Jeff
Alert system for monitoring changes in patient anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer
title Alert system for monitoring changes in patient anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer
title_full Alert system for monitoring changes in patient anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer
title_fullStr Alert system for monitoring changes in patient anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Alert system for monitoring changes in patient anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer
title_short Alert system for monitoring changes in patient anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer
title_sort alert system for monitoring changes in patient anatomy during radiation therapy of head and neck cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34302421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13342
work_keys_str_mv AT schalybryan alertsystemformonitoringchangesinpatientanatomyduringradiationtherapyofheadandneckcancer
AT kempejeff alertsystemformonitoringchangesinpatientanatomyduringradiationtherapyofheadandneckcancer
AT venkatesanvaragur alertsystemformonitoringchangesinpatientanatomyduringradiationtherapyofheadandneckcancer
AT mitchellsylvia alertsystemformonitoringchangesinpatientanatomyduringradiationtherapyofheadandneckcancer
AT chenjeff alertsystemformonitoringchangesinpatientanatomyduringradiationtherapyofheadandneckcancer