Cargando…
The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience
BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing number of organ donations, the utilization rate of donor lungs in China is much lower than that in many other countries. MATERIAL/METHODS: The donor lungs were evaluated before departure (stage 1), after on-site management (stage 2), and after harvesting (stage 3)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373440 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.931409 |
_version_ | 1783738501832900608 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Jin Liu, Dong Huang, Jian Jiang, Hua-chi Chen, Yuan Li, Hui-xing Li, Xiao-shan Chen, Jing-yu |
author_facet | Zhao, Jin Liu, Dong Huang, Jian Jiang, Hua-chi Chen, Yuan Li, Hui-xing Li, Xiao-shan Chen, Jing-yu |
author_sort | Zhao, Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing number of organ donations, the utilization rate of donor lungs in China is much lower than that in many other countries. MATERIAL/METHODS: The donor lungs were evaluated before departure (stage 1), after on-site management (stage 2), and after harvesting (stage 3). Variables of donor lungs from medical institutions with lung transplant qualification (group A) and those without qualification (group B) were compared. The outcome measurements for lung recipients were early survival and primary graft dysfunction. RESULTS: Among the 277 donor lungs, 140 (51%) were suitable for transplantation and 101 were sent to our institution for 62 single-lung transplantations and 50 double-lung transplantations. The acceptability rates at stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3 were 78%, 56%, and 51%, respectively. In addition, 69 (50.4%) donor lungs were abandoned for poor quality related to management, 24 (17.5%) for no adequate recipients, 15 (10.9%) for family refusal, 14 (10.2%) for organ procurement organization-related reasons, and 15 (10.9%) for other reasons. Donors in group A were ventilated longer and had longer ischemic time than those in group B. However, bronchoscopy, imaging, and oxygenation in group A achieved better results than in group B. No between-group difference in 30-day mortality or rate of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Problems at supply and demand ends contribute to the low utilization rate of donor lungs in China. The poor management of donor lungs and the short waiting list for lung transplantation are major reasons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8364286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83642862021-09-02 The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience Zhao, Jin Liu, Dong Huang, Jian Jiang, Hua-chi Chen, Yuan Li, Hui-xing Li, Xiao-shan Chen, Jing-yu Ann Transplant Original Paper BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing number of organ donations, the utilization rate of donor lungs in China is much lower than that in many other countries. MATERIAL/METHODS: The donor lungs were evaluated before departure (stage 1), after on-site management (stage 2), and after harvesting (stage 3). Variables of donor lungs from medical institutions with lung transplant qualification (group A) and those without qualification (group B) were compared. The outcome measurements for lung recipients were early survival and primary graft dysfunction. RESULTS: Among the 277 donor lungs, 140 (51%) were suitable for transplantation and 101 were sent to our institution for 62 single-lung transplantations and 50 double-lung transplantations. The acceptability rates at stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3 were 78%, 56%, and 51%, respectively. In addition, 69 (50.4%) donor lungs were abandoned for poor quality related to management, 24 (17.5%) for no adequate recipients, 15 (10.9%) for family refusal, 14 (10.2%) for organ procurement organization-related reasons, and 15 (10.9%) for other reasons. Donors in group A were ventilated longer and had longer ischemic time than those in group B. However, bronchoscopy, imaging, and oxygenation in group A achieved better results than in group B. No between-group difference in 30-day mortality or rate of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Problems at supply and demand ends contribute to the low utilization rate of donor lungs in China. The poor management of donor lungs and the short waiting list for lung transplantation are major reasons. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8364286/ /pubmed/34373440 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.931409 Text en © Ann Transplant, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Zhao, Jin Liu, Dong Huang, Jian Jiang, Hua-chi Chen, Yuan Li, Hui-xing Li, Xiao-shan Chen, Jing-yu The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience |
title | The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full | The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience |
title_fullStr | The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience |
title_short | The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience |
title_sort | low utilization rate of donor lungs in china: a single-center experience |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373440 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.931409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaojin thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT liudong thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT huangjian thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT jianghuachi thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT chenyuan thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT lihuixing thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT lixiaoshan thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT chenjingyu thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT zhaojin lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT liudong lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT huangjian lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT jianghuachi lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT chenyuan lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT lihuixing lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT lixiaoshan lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience AT chenjingyu lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience |