Cargando…

The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing number of organ donations, the utilization rate of donor lungs in China is much lower than that in many other countries. MATERIAL/METHODS: The donor lungs were evaluated before departure (stage 1), after on-site management (stage 2), and after harvesting (stage 3)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Jin, Liu, Dong, Huang, Jian, Jiang, Hua-chi, Chen, Yuan, Li, Hui-xing, Li, Xiao-shan, Chen, Jing-yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373440
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.931409
_version_ 1783738501832900608
author Zhao, Jin
Liu, Dong
Huang, Jian
Jiang, Hua-chi
Chen, Yuan
Li, Hui-xing
Li, Xiao-shan
Chen, Jing-yu
author_facet Zhao, Jin
Liu, Dong
Huang, Jian
Jiang, Hua-chi
Chen, Yuan
Li, Hui-xing
Li, Xiao-shan
Chen, Jing-yu
author_sort Zhao, Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing number of organ donations, the utilization rate of donor lungs in China is much lower than that in many other countries. MATERIAL/METHODS: The donor lungs were evaluated before departure (stage 1), after on-site management (stage 2), and after harvesting (stage 3). Variables of donor lungs from medical institutions with lung transplant qualification (group A) and those without qualification (group B) were compared. The outcome measurements for lung recipients were early survival and primary graft dysfunction. RESULTS: Among the 277 donor lungs, 140 (51%) were suitable for transplantation and 101 were sent to our institution for 62 single-lung transplantations and 50 double-lung transplantations. The acceptability rates at stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3 were 78%, 56%, and 51%, respectively. In addition, 69 (50.4%) donor lungs were abandoned for poor quality related to management, 24 (17.5%) for no adequate recipients, 15 (10.9%) for family refusal, 14 (10.2%) for organ procurement organization-related reasons, and 15 (10.9%) for other reasons. Donors in group A were ventilated longer and had longer ischemic time than those in group B. However, bronchoscopy, imaging, and oxygenation in group A achieved better results than in group B. No between-group difference in 30-day mortality or rate of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Problems at supply and demand ends contribute to the low utilization rate of donor lungs in China. The poor management of donor lungs and the short waiting list for lung transplantation are major reasons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8364286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83642862021-09-02 The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience Zhao, Jin Liu, Dong Huang, Jian Jiang, Hua-chi Chen, Yuan Li, Hui-xing Li, Xiao-shan Chen, Jing-yu Ann Transplant Original Paper BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing number of organ donations, the utilization rate of donor lungs in China is much lower than that in many other countries. MATERIAL/METHODS: The donor lungs were evaluated before departure (stage 1), after on-site management (stage 2), and after harvesting (stage 3). Variables of donor lungs from medical institutions with lung transplant qualification (group A) and those without qualification (group B) were compared. The outcome measurements for lung recipients were early survival and primary graft dysfunction. RESULTS: Among the 277 donor lungs, 140 (51%) were suitable for transplantation and 101 were sent to our institution for 62 single-lung transplantations and 50 double-lung transplantations. The acceptability rates at stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3 were 78%, 56%, and 51%, respectively. In addition, 69 (50.4%) donor lungs were abandoned for poor quality related to management, 24 (17.5%) for no adequate recipients, 15 (10.9%) for family refusal, 14 (10.2%) for organ procurement organization-related reasons, and 15 (10.9%) for other reasons. Donors in group A were ventilated longer and had longer ischemic time than those in group B. However, bronchoscopy, imaging, and oxygenation in group A achieved better results than in group B. No between-group difference in 30-day mortality or rate of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Problems at supply and demand ends contribute to the low utilization rate of donor lungs in China. The poor management of donor lungs and the short waiting list for lung transplantation are major reasons. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8364286/ /pubmed/34373440 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.931409 Text en © Ann Transplant, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Zhao, Jin
Liu, Dong
Huang, Jian
Jiang, Hua-chi
Chen, Yuan
Li, Hui-xing
Li, Xiao-shan
Chen, Jing-yu
The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience
title The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience
title_full The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience
title_short The Low Utilization Rate of Donor Lungs in China: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort low utilization rate of donor lungs in china: a single-center experience
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373440
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.931409
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaojin thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT liudong thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT huangjian thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT jianghuachi thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT chenyuan thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT lihuixing thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT lixiaoshan thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT chenjingyu thelowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT zhaojin lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT liudong lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT huangjian lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT jianghuachi lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT chenyuan lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT lihuixing lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT lixiaoshan lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience
AT chenjingyu lowutilizationrateofdonorlungsinchinaasinglecenterexperience