Cargando…
Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study
OBJECTIVES: To compare the dose reduction potential (DRP) of a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM, ClariCT.AI) with that of a vendor-specific deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm (DLR, TrueFidelity™). METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of a multi-sized image quality phantom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9 |
_version_ | 1783738506479140864 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Hyunsu Chang, Won Kim, Jong Hyo Ahn, Chulkyun Lee, Heejin Kim, Hae Young Cho, Jungheum Lee, Yoon Jin Kim, Young Hoon |
author_facet | Choi, Hyunsu Chang, Won Kim, Jong Hyo Ahn, Chulkyun Lee, Heejin Kim, Hae Young Cho, Jungheum Lee, Yoon Jin Kim, Young Hoon |
author_sort | Choi, Hyunsu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the dose reduction potential (DRP) of a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM, ClariCT.AI) with that of a vendor-specific deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm (DLR, TrueFidelity™). METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of a multi-sized image quality phantom (Mercury v4.0) were acquired under six radiation dose levels (0.48/0.97/1.93/3.87/7.74/15.47 mGy) and were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and three strength levels of the DLR (low/medium/high). The FBP images were denoised using the DLM. For all DLM and DLR images, the detectability index (d′) (a task-based detection performance metric) was obtained, under various combinations of three target sizes (10/5/1 mm), five inlets (CT value difference with the background; −895/50/90/335/1000 HU), five phantom diameters (36/31/26/21/16 cm), and six radiation dose levels. Dose reduction potential (DRP) measures the dose reduction made by using DLM or DLR, while yielding d′ equivalent to that of FBP at full dose. RESULTS: The DRPs of the DLM, DLR-low, DLR-medium, and DLR-high were 86% (81–88%), 60% (46–67%), 76% (60–81%), and 87% (78–92%), respectively. For 10-mm targets, the DRP of the DLM (87%) was higher than that of all DLR algorithms (58–86%). However, for smaller targets (5 mm/1 mm), the DRPs of the DLR-high (89/88%) were greater than those of the DLM (87/84%). CONCLUSION: The dose reduction potential of the vendor-agnostic DLM was shown to be comparable to that of the vendor-specific DLR at high strength and superior to those of the DLRs at medium and low strengths. KEY POINTS: • DRP of the vendor-agnostic model was comparable to that of high-strength vendor-specific model and superior to those of medium- and low-strength models. • Under various radiation dose levels, the deep learning model shows higher detectability indexes compared to FBP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8364308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83643082021-08-15 Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study Choi, Hyunsu Chang, Won Kim, Jong Hyo Ahn, Chulkyun Lee, Heejin Kim, Hae Young Cho, Jungheum Lee, Yoon Jin Kim, Young Hoon Eur Radiol Computed Tomography OBJECTIVES: To compare the dose reduction potential (DRP) of a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM, ClariCT.AI) with that of a vendor-specific deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm (DLR, TrueFidelity™). METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of a multi-sized image quality phantom (Mercury v4.0) were acquired under six radiation dose levels (0.48/0.97/1.93/3.87/7.74/15.47 mGy) and were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and three strength levels of the DLR (low/medium/high). The FBP images were denoised using the DLM. For all DLM and DLR images, the detectability index (d′) (a task-based detection performance metric) was obtained, under various combinations of three target sizes (10/5/1 mm), five inlets (CT value difference with the background; −895/50/90/335/1000 HU), five phantom diameters (36/31/26/21/16 cm), and six radiation dose levels. Dose reduction potential (DRP) measures the dose reduction made by using DLM or DLR, while yielding d′ equivalent to that of FBP at full dose. RESULTS: The DRPs of the DLM, DLR-low, DLR-medium, and DLR-high were 86% (81–88%), 60% (46–67%), 76% (60–81%), and 87% (78–92%), respectively. For 10-mm targets, the DRP of the DLM (87%) was higher than that of all DLR algorithms (58–86%). However, for smaller targets (5 mm/1 mm), the DRPs of the DLR-high (89/88%) were greater than those of the DLM (87/84%). CONCLUSION: The dose reduction potential of the vendor-agnostic DLM was shown to be comparable to that of the vendor-specific DLR at high strength and superior to those of the DLRs at medium and low strengths. KEY POINTS: • DRP of the vendor-agnostic model was comparable to that of high-strength vendor-specific model and superior to those of medium- and low-strength models. • Under various radiation dose levels, the deep learning model shows higher detectability indexes compared to FBP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8364308/ /pubmed/34390372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9 Text en © European Society of Radiology 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Computed Tomography Choi, Hyunsu Chang, Won Kim, Jong Hyo Ahn, Chulkyun Lee, Heejin Kim, Hae Young Cho, Jungheum Lee, Yoon Jin Kim, Young Hoon Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study |
title | Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study |
title_full | Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study |
title_fullStr | Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study |
title_short | Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study |
title_sort | dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on ct: a phantom study |
topic | Computed Tomography |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choihyunsu dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy AT changwon dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy AT kimjonghyo dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy AT ahnchulkyun dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy AT leeheejin dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy AT kimhaeyoung dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy AT chojungheum dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy AT leeyoonjin dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy AT kimyounghoon dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy |