Cargando…

Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study

OBJECTIVES: To compare the dose reduction potential (DRP) of a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM, ClariCT.AI) with that of a vendor-specific deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm (DLR, TrueFidelity™). METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of a multi-sized image quality phantom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Hyunsu, Chang, Won, Kim, Jong Hyo, Ahn, Chulkyun, Lee, Heejin, Kim, Hae Young, Cho, Jungheum, Lee, Yoon Jin, Kim, Young Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9
_version_ 1783738506479140864
author Choi, Hyunsu
Chang, Won
Kim, Jong Hyo
Ahn, Chulkyun
Lee, Heejin
Kim, Hae Young
Cho, Jungheum
Lee, Yoon Jin
Kim, Young Hoon
author_facet Choi, Hyunsu
Chang, Won
Kim, Jong Hyo
Ahn, Chulkyun
Lee, Heejin
Kim, Hae Young
Cho, Jungheum
Lee, Yoon Jin
Kim, Young Hoon
author_sort Choi, Hyunsu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the dose reduction potential (DRP) of a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM, ClariCT.AI) with that of a vendor-specific deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm (DLR, TrueFidelity™). METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of a multi-sized image quality phantom (Mercury v4.0) were acquired under six radiation dose levels (0.48/0.97/1.93/3.87/7.74/15.47 mGy) and were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and three strength levels of the DLR (low/medium/high). The FBP images were denoised using the DLM. For all DLM and DLR images, the detectability index (d′) (a task-based detection performance metric) was obtained, under various combinations of three target sizes (10/5/1 mm), five inlets (CT value difference with the background; −895/50/90/335/1000 HU), five phantom diameters (36/31/26/21/16 cm), and six radiation dose levels. Dose reduction potential (DRP) measures the dose reduction made by using DLM or DLR, while yielding d′ equivalent to that of FBP at full dose. RESULTS: The DRPs of the DLM, DLR-low, DLR-medium, and DLR-high were 86% (81–88%), 60% (46–67%), 76% (60–81%), and 87% (78–92%), respectively. For 10-mm targets, the DRP of the DLM (87%) was higher than that of all DLR algorithms (58–86%). However, for smaller targets (5 mm/1 mm), the DRPs of the DLR-high (89/88%) were greater than those of the DLM (87/84%). CONCLUSION: The dose reduction potential of the vendor-agnostic DLM was shown to be comparable to that of the vendor-specific DLR at high strength and superior to those of the DLRs at medium and low strengths. KEY POINTS: • DRP of the vendor-agnostic model was comparable to that of high-strength vendor-specific model and superior to those of medium- and low-strength models. • Under various radiation dose levels, the deep learning model shows higher detectability indexes compared to FBP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8364308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83643082021-08-15 Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study Choi, Hyunsu Chang, Won Kim, Jong Hyo Ahn, Chulkyun Lee, Heejin Kim, Hae Young Cho, Jungheum Lee, Yoon Jin Kim, Young Hoon Eur Radiol Computed Tomography OBJECTIVES: To compare the dose reduction potential (DRP) of a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM, ClariCT.AI) with that of a vendor-specific deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm (DLR, TrueFidelity™). METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of a multi-sized image quality phantom (Mercury v4.0) were acquired under six radiation dose levels (0.48/0.97/1.93/3.87/7.74/15.47 mGy) and were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and three strength levels of the DLR (low/medium/high). The FBP images were denoised using the DLM. For all DLM and DLR images, the detectability index (d′) (a task-based detection performance metric) was obtained, under various combinations of three target sizes (10/5/1 mm), five inlets (CT value difference with the background; −895/50/90/335/1000 HU), five phantom diameters (36/31/26/21/16 cm), and six radiation dose levels. Dose reduction potential (DRP) measures the dose reduction made by using DLM or DLR, while yielding d′ equivalent to that of FBP at full dose. RESULTS: The DRPs of the DLM, DLR-low, DLR-medium, and DLR-high were 86% (81–88%), 60% (46–67%), 76% (60–81%), and 87% (78–92%), respectively. For 10-mm targets, the DRP of the DLM (87%) was higher than that of all DLR algorithms (58–86%). However, for smaller targets (5 mm/1 mm), the DRPs of the DLR-high (89/88%) were greater than those of the DLM (87/84%). CONCLUSION: The dose reduction potential of the vendor-agnostic DLM was shown to be comparable to that of the vendor-specific DLR at high strength and superior to those of the DLRs at medium and low strengths. KEY POINTS: • DRP of the vendor-agnostic model was comparable to that of high-strength vendor-specific model and superior to those of medium- and low-strength models. • Under various radiation dose levels, the deep learning model shows higher detectability indexes compared to FBP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8364308/ /pubmed/34390372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9 Text en © European Society of Radiology 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Computed Tomography
Choi, Hyunsu
Chang, Won
Kim, Jong Hyo
Ahn, Chulkyun
Lee, Heejin
Kim, Hae Young
Cho, Jungheum
Lee, Yoon Jin
Kim, Young Hoon
Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study
title Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study
title_full Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study
title_fullStr Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study
title_full_unstemmed Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study
title_short Dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on CT: a phantom study
title_sort dose reduction potential of vendor-agnostic deep learning model in comparison with deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm on ct: a phantom study
topic Computed Tomography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08199-9
work_keys_str_mv AT choihyunsu dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy
AT changwon dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy
AT kimjonghyo dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy
AT ahnchulkyun dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy
AT leeheejin dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy
AT kimhaeyoung dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy
AT chojungheum dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy
AT leeyoonjin dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy
AT kimyounghoon dosereductionpotentialofvendoragnosticdeeplearningmodelincomparisonwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionalgorithmonctaphantomstudy