Cargando…

COVID-19 Infection in Reproductive Age Group Females: Experience of a Tertiary Care Urban Teaching Hospital

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to find out the effect, course of disease and management of the COVID-19 infection in pregnant women and compare it with non-pregnant population. METHOD: This is a retrospective study done at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Institute of Medical Science and Resear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehta, Ami V., Patel, Rina V., Shah, Parul T., Deliwala, Kruti J., Mehta, Shital T., Vyas, Rupa C., Shah, Akshay C., Khambhojia, Janak, Gupta, Aishwarya, Saiyed, Fiza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer India 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01519-5
_version_ 1783738528032620544
author Mehta, Ami V.
Patel, Rina V.
Shah, Parul T.
Deliwala, Kruti J.
Mehta, Shital T.
Vyas, Rupa C.
Shah, Akshay C.
Khambhojia, Janak
Gupta, Aishwarya
Saiyed, Fiza
author_facet Mehta, Ami V.
Patel, Rina V.
Shah, Parul T.
Deliwala, Kruti J.
Mehta, Shital T.
Vyas, Rupa C.
Shah, Akshay C.
Khambhojia, Janak
Gupta, Aishwarya
Saiyed, Fiza
author_sort Mehta, Ami V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to find out the effect, course of disease and management of the COVID-19 infection in pregnant women and compare it with non-pregnant population. METHOD: This is a retrospective study done at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Institute of Medical Science and Research (SVPIMSR), Smt. NHL MMC, Ahmedabad, from April 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. All COVID-19-positive patients were divided into two groups: group A was comprised of pregnant/postpartum and group B of non-pregnant patients. RESULT: A total of 709 women (Group A-205, Group B-504) were included in the study, In group A 90% of patients were asymptomatic, while in group B 48% asymptomatic patients. Group A had 5.9% and group B had 13.1% patients having comorbidities. In group A, smaller number of patients had raised inflammatory markers as compared to group B. Only 4% patients of group A showed significant changes on chest X-ray as compared to 16% in group B. Only 2.9% patients of group A required intensive care unit admission as compared to 10.31% patients of group B. Mean hospital stay of group A was 10.6 days, and that of group B was 12.1 days. CONCLUSION: In pregnancy, due to the physiological alterations in cardiovascular, respiratory and immune system, the pregnant women are vulnerable to infections. Although pregnancy is immunocompromised state, the severity of Coivd-19 disease is milder as compared to non-pregnant COVID-19-positive patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8364410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer India
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83644102021-08-15 COVID-19 Infection in Reproductive Age Group Females: Experience of a Tertiary Care Urban Teaching Hospital Mehta, Ami V. Patel, Rina V. Shah, Parul T. Deliwala, Kruti J. Mehta, Shital T. Vyas, Rupa C. Shah, Akshay C. Khambhojia, Janak Gupta, Aishwarya Saiyed, Fiza J Obstet Gynaecol India Original Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to find out the effect, course of disease and management of the COVID-19 infection in pregnant women and compare it with non-pregnant population. METHOD: This is a retrospective study done at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Institute of Medical Science and Research (SVPIMSR), Smt. NHL MMC, Ahmedabad, from April 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. All COVID-19-positive patients were divided into two groups: group A was comprised of pregnant/postpartum and group B of non-pregnant patients. RESULT: A total of 709 women (Group A-205, Group B-504) were included in the study, In group A 90% of patients were asymptomatic, while in group B 48% asymptomatic patients. Group A had 5.9% and group B had 13.1% patients having comorbidities. In group A, smaller number of patients had raised inflammatory markers as compared to group B. Only 4% patients of group A showed significant changes on chest X-ray as compared to 16% in group B. Only 2.9% patients of group A required intensive care unit admission as compared to 10.31% patients of group B. Mean hospital stay of group A was 10.6 days, and that of group B was 12.1 days. CONCLUSION: In pregnancy, due to the physiological alterations in cardiovascular, respiratory and immune system, the pregnant women are vulnerable to infections. Although pregnancy is immunocompromised state, the severity of Coivd-19 disease is milder as compared to non-pregnant COVID-19-positive patients. Springer India 2021-08-14 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8364410/ /pubmed/34413581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01519-5 Text en © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2021
spellingShingle Original Article
Mehta, Ami V.
Patel, Rina V.
Shah, Parul T.
Deliwala, Kruti J.
Mehta, Shital T.
Vyas, Rupa C.
Shah, Akshay C.
Khambhojia, Janak
Gupta, Aishwarya
Saiyed, Fiza
COVID-19 Infection in Reproductive Age Group Females: Experience of a Tertiary Care Urban Teaching Hospital
title COVID-19 Infection in Reproductive Age Group Females: Experience of a Tertiary Care Urban Teaching Hospital
title_full COVID-19 Infection in Reproductive Age Group Females: Experience of a Tertiary Care Urban Teaching Hospital
title_fullStr COVID-19 Infection in Reproductive Age Group Females: Experience of a Tertiary Care Urban Teaching Hospital
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 Infection in Reproductive Age Group Females: Experience of a Tertiary Care Urban Teaching Hospital
title_short COVID-19 Infection in Reproductive Age Group Females: Experience of a Tertiary Care Urban Teaching Hospital
title_sort covid-19 infection in reproductive age group females: experience of a tertiary care urban teaching hospital
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01519-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mehtaamiv covid19infectioninreproductiveagegroupfemalesexperienceofatertiarycareurbanteachinghospital
AT patelrinav covid19infectioninreproductiveagegroupfemalesexperienceofatertiarycareurbanteachinghospital
AT shahparult covid19infectioninreproductiveagegroupfemalesexperienceofatertiarycareurbanteachinghospital
AT deliwalakrutij covid19infectioninreproductiveagegroupfemalesexperienceofatertiarycareurbanteachinghospital
AT mehtashitalt covid19infectioninreproductiveagegroupfemalesexperienceofatertiarycareurbanteachinghospital
AT vyasrupac covid19infectioninreproductiveagegroupfemalesexperienceofatertiarycareurbanteachinghospital
AT shahakshayc covid19infectioninreproductiveagegroupfemalesexperienceofatertiarycareurbanteachinghospital
AT khambhojiajanak covid19infectioninreproductiveagegroupfemalesexperienceofatertiarycareurbanteachinghospital
AT guptaaishwarya covid19infectioninreproductiveagegroupfemalesexperienceofatertiarycareurbanteachinghospital
AT saiyedfiza covid19infectioninreproductiveagegroupfemalesexperienceofatertiarycareurbanteachinghospital