Cargando…
Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the two-hole technique in augmenting the efficiency of surgeons-in-training when performing the phaco-chop technique. We hypothesized that drilling two holes in opposite angles to each other adjacent to the capsulorhexis would mimic a new lens equator. The phaco-tip a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01872-4 |
_version_ | 1783738547456442368 |
---|---|
author | Miyamoto, Naomi Kiritoshi, Shoko Akamime, Rinko Akimoto, Masayuki |
author_facet | Miyamoto, Naomi Kiritoshi, Shoko Akamime, Rinko Akimoto, Masayuki |
author_sort | Miyamoto, Naomi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the two-hole technique in augmenting the efficiency of surgeons-in-training when performing the phaco-chop technique. We hypothesized that drilling two holes in opposite angles to each other adjacent to the capsulorhexis would mimic a new lens equator. The phaco-tip and the chopper can be inserted into these holes at appropriate depths and may sandwich and fracture the lens more easily than conventional methods. METHODS: The two-hole technique described above was performed by three first-year surgeons before they performed the standard phaco-chop technique. We collected data of their first 8 cases and analyzed a total of 64 cases: 16, divide-and-conquer; 24, two-hole method; 24, phaco-chop. The main outcome measures included the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and case ultrasound time (UST) with different phacoemulsification techniques. RESULTS: The young practicing surgeons eventually performed the standard phaco-chop more safely after repeated practice using the two-hole method. The drilling of holes enabled deep and effortless impaling of the nucleus. Although there was no significant difference in the CDE among the techniques, there was a significant difference in the UST (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The two-hole method enabled surgeons-in-training to acquire standard phaco-chop skills more efficiently. However, further studies with higher statistical power will be needed to validate these findings. Additionally, a variation of this technique, the four-hole method, is applicable even for experienced surgeons in cases of a hardened nucleus. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-021-01872-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8364540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83645402021-08-19 Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping Miyamoto, Naomi Kiritoshi, Shoko Akamime, Rinko Akimoto, Masayuki Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the two-hole technique in augmenting the efficiency of surgeons-in-training when performing the phaco-chop technique. We hypothesized that drilling two holes in opposite angles to each other adjacent to the capsulorhexis would mimic a new lens equator. The phaco-tip and the chopper can be inserted into these holes at appropriate depths and may sandwich and fracture the lens more easily than conventional methods. METHODS: The two-hole technique described above was performed by three first-year surgeons before they performed the standard phaco-chop technique. We collected data of their first 8 cases and analyzed a total of 64 cases: 16, divide-and-conquer; 24, two-hole method; 24, phaco-chop. The main outcome measures included the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and case ultrasound time (UST) with different phacoemulsification techniques. RESULTS: The young practicing surgeons eventually performed the standard phaco-chop more safely after repeated practice using the two-hole method. The drilling of holes enabled deep and effortless impaling of the nucleus. Although there was no significant difference in the CDE among the techniques, there was a significant difference in the UST (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The two-hole method enabled surgeons-in-training to acquire standard phaco-chop skills more efficiently. However, further studies with higher statistical power will be needed to validate these findings. Additionally, a variation of this technique, the four-hole method, is applicable even for experienced surgeons in cases of a hardened nucleus. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-021-01872-4. Springer Netherlands 2021-05-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8364540/ /pubmed/33948807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01872-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Miyamoto, Naomi Kiritoshi, Shoko Akamime, Rinko Akimoto, Masayuki Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping |
title | Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping |
title_full | Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping |
title_fullStr | Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping |
title_short | Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping |
title_sort | two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01872-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miyamotonaomi twoholeassistedphacochoptechniqueamoreefficientmethodforsafenucleofractisverticalchopping AT kiritoshishoko twoholeassistedphacochoptechniqueamoreefficientmethodforsafenucleofractisverticalchopping AT akamimerinko twoholeassistedphacochoptechniqueamoreefficientmethodforsafenucleofractisverticalchopping AT akimotomasayuki twoholeassistedphacochoptechniqueamoreefficientmethodforsafenucleofractisverticalchopping |