Cargando…

Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the two-hole technique in augmenting the efficiency of surgeons-in-training when performing the phaco-chop technique. We hypothesized that drilling two holes in opposite angles to each other adjacent to the capsulorhexis would mimic a new lens equator. The phaco-tip a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyamoto, Naomi, Kiritoshi, Shoko, Akamime, Rinko, Akimoto, Masayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01872-4
_version_ 1783738547456442368
author Miyamoto, Naomi
Kiritoshi, Shoko
Akamime, Rinko
Akimoto, Masayuki
author_facet Miyamoto, Naomi
Kiritoshi, Shoko
Akamime, Rinko
Akimoto, Masayuki
author_sort Miyamoto, Naomi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the two-hole technique in augmenting the efficiency of surgeons-in-training when performing the phaco-chop technique. We hypothesized that drilling two holes in opposite angles to each other adjacent to the capsulorhexis would mimic a new lens equator. The phaco-tip and the chopper can be inserted into these holes at appropriate depths and may sandwich and fracture the lens more easily than conventional methods. METHODS: The two-hole technique described above was performed by three first-year surgeons before they performed the standard phaco-chop technique. We collected data of their first 8 cases and analyzed a total of 64 cases: 16, divide-and-conquer; 24, two-hole method; 24, phaco-chop. The main outcome measures included the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and case ultrasound time (UST) with different phacoemulsification techniques. RESULTS: The young practicing surgeons eventually performed the standard phaco-chop more safely after repeated practice using the two-hole method. The drilling of holes enabled deep and effortless impaling of the nucleus. Although there was no significant difference in the CDE among the techniques, there was a significant difference in the UST (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The two-hole method enabled surgeons-in-training to acquire standard phaco-chop skills more efficiently. However, further studies with higher statistical power will be needed to validate these findings. Additionally, a variation of this technique, the four-hole method, is applicable even for experienced surgeons in cases of a hardened nucleus. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-021-01872-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8364540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83645402021-08-19 Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping Miyamoto, Naomi Kiritoshi, Shoko Akamime, Rinko Akimoto, Masayuki Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the two-hole technique in augmenting the efficiency of surgeons-in-training when performing the phaco-chop technique. We hypothesized that drilling two holes in opposite angles to each other adjacent to the capsulorhexis would mimic a new lens equator. The phaco-tip and the chopper can be inserted into these holes at appropriate depths and may sandwich and fracture the lens more easily than conventional methods. METHODS: The two-hole technique described above was performed by three first-year surgeons before they performed the standard phaco-chop technique. We collected data of their first 8 cases and analyzed a total of 64 cases: 16, divide-and-conquer; 24, two-hole method; 24, phaco-chop. The main outcome measures included the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and case ultrasound time (UST) with different phacoemulsification techniques. RESULTS: The young practicing surgeons eventually performed the standard phaco-chop more safely after repeated practice using the two-hole method. The drilling of holes enabled deep and effortless impaling of the nucleus. Although there was no significant difference in the CDE among the techniques, there was a significant difference in the UST (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The two-hole method enabled surgeons-in-training to acquire standard phaco-chop skills more efficiently. However, further studies with higher statistical power will be needed to validate these findings. Additionally, a variation of this technique, the four-hole method, is applicable even for experienced surgeons in cases of a hardened nucleus. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-021-01872-4. Springer Netherlands 2021-05-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8364540/ /pubmed/33948807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01872-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Miyamoto, Naomi
Kiritoshi, Shoko
Akamime, Rinko
Akimoto, Masayuki
Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping
title Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping
title_full Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping
title_fullStr Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping
title_full_unstemmed Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping
title_short Two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping
title_sort two-hole assisted phaco-chop technique: a more efficient method for safe nucleofractis vertical chopping
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01872-4
work_keys_str_mv AT miyamotonaomi twoholeassistedphacochoptechniqueamoreefficientmethodforsafenucleofractisverticalchopping
AT kiritoshishoko twoholeassistedphacochoptechniqueamoreefficientmethodforsafenucleofractisverticalchopping
AT akamimerinko twoholeassistedphacochoptechniqueamoreefficientmethodforsafenucleofractisverticalchopping
AT akimotomasayuki twoholeassistedphacochoptechniqueamoreefficientmethodforsafenucleofractisverticalchopping