Cargando…

Challenges in the Interpretation of MRI Examinations Without Radiographic Correlation: Pearls and Pitfalls to Avoid

As physics introduces more complex and seemingly thorough techniques to evaluate patient symptoms, cross-sectional imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), seems like the modality of choice to best help patients. However, musculoskeletal radiology (MSK) requires not just the excellent s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richter, Ryan H, Byerly, Douglas, Schultz, Donald, Mansfield, Liem T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34414045
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16419
Descripción
Sumario:As physics introduces more complex and seemingly thorough techniques to evaluate patient symptoms, cross-sectional imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), seems like the modality of choice to best help patients. However, musculoskeletal radiology (MSK) requires not just the excellent soft-tissue contrast provided by MRI but also an evaluation of the aggressiveness of a lesion, a detailed evaluation of osseous anatomy or distribution of disease, and a way to easily identify calcifications and gas in soft tissue in order to make the correct diagnosis. This article will demonstrate, through numerous cases, the importance of radiographs in the full characterization of MSK-related pathology. It will focus on imaging pearls and pitfalls to avoid when radiographs are not available and discuss the findings that can be expected if comparison radiographs were available.