Cargando…

Ventilation of ordinary face masks

Wearing of face masks has been identified as an essential means of reducing COVID-19 infection during the pandemic. However, air leakage into ordinary face masks decreases the protection they provide. Wearing a mask also causes both CO(2) and humidity to accumulate inside, imposing breathing difficu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huo, Shigao, Zhang, Tengfei (Tim)
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34421186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108261
_version_ 1783738596517216256
author Huo, Shigao
Zhang, Tengfei (Tim)
author_facet Huo, Shigao
Zhang, Tengfei (Tim)
author_sort Huo, Shigao
collection PubMed
description Wearing of face masks has been identified as an essential means of reducing COVID-19 infection during the pandemic. However, air leakage into ordinary face masks decreases the protection they provide. Wearing a mask also causes both CO(2) and humidity to accumulate inside, imposing breathing difficulty and discomfort. To remedy the above problems, this investigation proposed to ventilate ordinary masks by supplying additional HEPA filtered air. The N95, surgical, and cotton masks available on the market, were modified into ventilated masks. The air inside the masks was extracted for measurement of the PM(2.5), CO(2), and water vapor concentrations. The protection provided by the masks was evaluated in terms of their effectiveness in shielding wearers from ambient PM(2.5). Mask comfort was examined in terms of both CO(2) concentration and humidity ratio. In addition, a mathematical model was established to solve for the exchanged air flow rates via different routes. Subjective voting by 20 mask wearers was also conducted. Performance of the ventilated face masks were compared against the non-ventilated ones. It was found that the protection provided by the ordinary non-ventilated masks is much lower than that claimed for the filter materials alone due to significantly total inward leakage. The accumulated CO(2) and humidity inside masks resulted in discomfort and complaints. For contrast, the ventilated face masks not only enhanced protection by suppressing the inward leakage of ambient airborne particles, but also significantly improved comfort. The wearers preferred a filtered air flow rate ranging from 18 to 23 L/min.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8364838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83648382021-08-16 Ventilation of ordinary face masks Huo, Shigao Zhang, Tengfei (Tim) Build Environ Article Wearing of face masks has been identified as an essential means of reducing COVID-19 infection during the pandemic. However, air leakage into ordinary face masks decreases the protection they provide. Wearing a mask also causes both CO(2) and humidity to accumulate inside, imposing breathing difficulty and discomfort. To remedy the above problems, this investigation proposed to ventilate ordinary masks by supplying additional HEPA filtered air. The N95, surgical, and cotton masks available on the market, were modified into ventilated masks. The air inside the masks was extracted for measurement of the PM(2.5), CO(2), and water vapor concentrations. The protection provided by the masks was evaluated in terms of their effectiveness in shielding wearers from ambient PM(2.5). Mask comfort was examined in terms of both CO(2) concentration and humidity ratio. In addition, a mathematical model was established to solve for the exchanged air flow rates via different routes. Subjective voting by 20 mask wearers was also conducted. Performance of the ventilated face masks were compared against the non-ventilated ones. It was found that the protection provided by the ordinary non-ventilated masks is much lower than that claimed for the filter materials alone due to significantly total inward leakage. The accumulated CO(2) and humidity inside masks resulted in discomfort and complaints. For contrast, the ventilated face masks not only enhanced protection by suppressing the inward leakage of ambient airborne particles, but also significantly improved comfort. The wearers preferred a filtered air flow rate ranging from 18 to 23 L/min. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-11 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8364838/ /pubmed/34421186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108261 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Huo, Shigao
Zhang, Tengfei (Tim)
Ventilation of ordinary face masks
title Ventilation of ordinary face masks
title_full Ventilation of ordinary face masks
title_fullStr Ventilation of ordinary face masks
title_full_unstemmed Ventilation of ordinary face masks
title_short Ventilation of ordinary face masks
title_sort ventilation of ordinary face masks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34421186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108261
work_keys_str_mv AT huoshigao ventilationofordinaryfacemasks
AT zhangtengfeitim ventilationofordinaryfacemasks