Cargando…

The efficiency of mandibular mini-implants in reducing adverse effects of class II elastics in adolescent female patients: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Excessive proclination of lower incisors and other undesirable consequences usually result from the use of class II elastics during orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to attempt to limit the adverse effects of class II elastics by the use of mini implants placed in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Dawlatly, Mostafa M., Mabrouk, Mohamed A., ElDakroury, Amr, Mostafa, Yehya A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00368-2
_version_ 1783738602497245184
author El-Dawlatly, Mostafa M.
Mabrouk, Mohamed A.
ElDakroury, Amr
Mostafa, Yehya A.
author_facet El-Dawlatly, Mostafa M.
Mabrouk, Mohamed A.
ElDakroury, Amr
Mostafa, Yehya A.
author_sort El-Dawlatly, Mostafa M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Excessive proclination of lower incisors and other undesirable consequences usually result from the use of class II elastics during orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to attempt to limit the adverse effects of class II elastics by the use of mini implants placed in the mandibular arch in adolescent class II female patients. METHODS: The sample comprised 28 patients, (a mean age of 15.66 ± 2 years for intervention group and 15.1 ± 2.2 years for conventional group) with one-fourth or one-half unit class II canine relationship. The sample was divided into two equal groups. Randomization was carried out by a computer sequence generator with a 1:1 allocation ratio. In the intervention group, the mini implants were inserted between the lower second premolar and first molar, while the conventional group underwent regular class II elastics therapy. The active elastics treatment time was 8 months for both groups. Results were assessed by measurements from pre- and post-elastics lateral cephalometric radiographs. RESULTS: The change in L1 inclination (0.97 ± 0.92°) and L1 AP position (0.31 ± 0.63 mm) did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups, but a statistically significant difference was found in the U1 retroclination (5.23 ± 1.92°) and U1 distal movement (4.05 ± 1.4 mm) [P ˂ 0.001] and [P ˂ 0.05] respectively in favor of the intervention group. CONCLUSION: Mini-implants in conjunction with class II elastics had no skeletal effect, mainly dentoalveolar and it did not prevent the proclination of lower incisors. There was more distal movement in the upper incisors in the skeletal anchorage group which helped in enhancing the camouflaging of class II malocclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered “FUE.REC (10)/10-2018” at the FUE registration council for clinical trials/IOP Orthodontic Program October 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8364895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83648952021-08-31 The efficiency of mandibular mini-implants in reducing adverse effects of class II elastics in adolescent female patients: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial El-Dawlatly, Mostafa M. Mabrouk, Mohamed A. ElDakroury, Amr Mostafa, Yehya A. Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: Excessive proclination of lower incisors and other undesirable consequences usually result from the use of class II elastics during orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to attempt to limit the adverse effects of class II elastics by the use of mini implants placed in the mandibular arch in adolescent class II female patients. METHODS: The sample comprised 28 patients, (a mean age of 15.66 ± 2 years for intervention group and 15.1 ± 2.2 years for conventional group) with one-fourth or one-half unit class II canine relationship. The sample was divided into two equal groups. Randomization was carried out by a computer sequence generator with a 1:1 allocation ratio. In the intervention group, the mini implants were inserted between the lower second premolar and first molar, while the conventional group underwent regular class II elastics therapy. The active elastics treatment time was 8 months for both groups. Results were assessed by measurements from pre- and post-elastics lateral cephalometric radiographs. RESULTS: The change in L1 inclination (0.97 ± 0.92°) and L1 AP position (0.31 ± 0.63 mm) did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups, but a statistically significant difference was found in the U1 retroclination (5.23 ± 1.92°) and U1 distal movement (4.05 ± 1.4 mm) [P ˂ 0.001] and [P ˂ 0.05] respectively in favor of the intervention group. CONCLUSION: Mini-implants in conjunction with class II elastics had no skeletal effect, mainly dentoalveolar and it did not prevent the proclination of lower incisors. There was more distal movement in the upper incisors in the skeletal anchorage group which helped in enhancing the camouflaging of class II malocclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered “FUE.REC (10)/10-2018” at the FUE registration council for clinical trials/IOP Orthodontic Program October 2018. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8364895/ /pubmed/34396485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00368-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
El-Dawlatly, Mostafa M.
Mabrouk, Mohamed A.
ElDakroury, Amr
Mostafa, Yehya A.
The efficiency of mandibular mini-implants in reducing adverse effects of class II elastics in adolescent female patients: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial
title The efficiency of mandibular mini-implants in reducing adverse effects of class II elastics in adolescent female patients: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_full The efficiency of mandibular mini-implants in reducing adverse effects of class II elastics in adolescent female patients: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The efficiency of mandibular mini-implants in reducing adverse effects of class II elastics in adolescent female patients: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The efficiency of mandibular mini-implants in reducing adverse effects of class II elastics in adolescent female patients: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_short The efficiency of mandibular mini-implants in reducing adverse effects of class II elastics in adolescent female patients: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficiency of mandibular mini-implants in reducing adverse effects of class ii elastics in adolescent female patients: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00368-2
work_keys_str_mv AT eldawlatlymostafam theefficiencyofmandibularminiimplantsinreducingadverseeffectsofclassiielasticsinadolescentfemalepatientsasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mabroukmohameda theefficiencyofmandibularminiimplantsinreducingadverseeffectsofclassiielasticsinadolescentfemalepatientsasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT eldakrouryamr theefficiencyofmandibularminiimplantsinreducingadverseeffectsofclassiielasticsinadolescentfemalepatientsasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mostafayehyaa theefficiencyofmandibularminiimplantsinreducingadverseeffectsofclassiielasticsinadolescentfemalepatientsasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT eldawlatlymostafam efficiencyofmandibularminiimplantsinreducingadverseeffectsofclassiielasticsinadolescentfemalepatientsasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mabroukmohameda efficiencyofmandibularminiimplantsinreducingadverseeffectsofclassiielasticsinadolescentfemalepatientsasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT eldakrouryamr efficiencyofmandibularminiimplantsinreducingadverseeffectsofclassiielasticsinadolescentfemalepatientsasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mostafayehyaa efficiencyofmandibularminiimplantsinreducingadverseeffectsofclassiielasticsinadolescentfemalepatientsasingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial