Cargando…
External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish an external validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a Japanese cohort to preoperatively evaluate the probability of lymph node invasion in patients with high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 278 patients with prostate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01954-4 |
_version_ | 1783738602970152960 |
---|---|
author | Fukagawa, Eri Yamamoto, Shinya Ohde, Sachiko Yoshitomi, Kasumi Kaneko Hamada, Kosuke Yoneoka, Yusuke Fujiwara, Motohiro Fujiwara, Ryo Oguchi, Tomohiko Komai, Yoshinobu Numao, Noboru Yuasa, Takeshi Fukui, Iwao Yonese, Junji |
author_facet | Fukagawa, Eri Yamamoto, Shinya Ohde, Sachiko Yoshitomi, Kasumi Kaneko Hamada, Kosuke Yoneoka, Yusuke Fujiwara, Motohiro Fujiwara, Ryo Oguchi, Tomohiko Komai, Yoshinobu Numao, Noboru Yuasa, Takeshi Fukui, Iwao Yonese, Junji |
author_sort | Fukagawa, Eri |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish an external validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a Japanese cohort to preoperatively evaluate the probability of lymph node invasion in patients with high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 278 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection from 2012 to 2020. Patients were rated using the Briganti 2019 nomogram, which evaluates the probability of lymph node invasion. We used the area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis to quantify the accuracy of the nomogram. RESULTS: Nineteen (6.8%) patients had lymph node invasion. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 18. The area under the curve for the Briganti 2019 was 0.71. When the cutoff was set at 7%, 84 (30.2%) patients with extended pelvic lymph node dissection could be omitted, and only 1 (1.2%) patient with lymph node invasion would be missed. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values at the 7% cutoff were 94.7, 32.0, and 98.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This external validation showed that the Briganti 2019 nomogram was accurate, although there may still be scope for individual adjustments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8364898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83648982021-08-19 External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer Fukagawa, Eri Yamamoto, Shinya Ohde, Sachiko Yoshitomi, Kasumi Kaneko Hamada, Kosuke Yoneoka, Yusuke Fujiwara, Motohiro Fujiwara, Ryo Oguchi, Tomohiko Komai, Yoshinobu Numao, Noboru Yuasa, Takeshi Fukui, Iwao Yonese, Junji Int J Clin Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish an external validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a Japanese cohort to preoperatively evaluate the probability of lymph node invasion in patients with high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 278 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection from 2012 to 2020. Patients were rated using the Briganti 2019 nomogram, which evaluates the probability of lymph node invasion. We used the area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis to quantify the accuracy of the nomogram. RESULTS: Nineteen (6.8%) patients had lymph node invasion. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 18. The area under the curve for the Briganti 2019 was 0.71. When the cutoff was set at 7%, 84 (30.2%) patients with extended pelvic lymph node dissection could be omitted, and only 1 (1.2%) patient with lymph node invasion would be missed. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values at the 7% cutoff were 94.7, 32.0, and 98.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This external validation showed that the Briganti 2019 nomogram was accurate, although there may still be scope for individual adjustments. Springer Singapore 2021-06-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8364898/ /pubmed/34117947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01954-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fukagawa, Eri Yamamoto, Shinya Ohde, Sachiko Yoshitomi, Kasumi Kaneko Hamada, Kosuke Yoneoka, Yusuke Fujiwara, Motohiro Fujiwara, Ryo Oguchi, Tomohiko Komai, Yoshinobu Numao, Noboru Yuasa, Takeshi Fukui, Iwao Yonese, Junji External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer |
title | External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer |
title_full | External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer |
title_short | External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer |
title_sort | external validation of the briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01954-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fukagawaeri externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT yamamotoshinya externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT ohdesachiko externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT yoshitomikasumikaneko externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT hamadakosuke externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT yoneokayusuke externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT fujiwaramotohiro externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT fujiwararyo externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT oguchitomohiko externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT komaiyoshinobu externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT numaonoboru externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT yuasatakeshi externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT fukuiiwao externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT yonesejunji externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer |