Cargando…

External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish an external validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a Japanese cohort to preoperatively evaluate the probability of lymph node invasion in patients with high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 278 patients with prostate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukagawa, Eri, Yamamoto, Shinya, Ohde, Sachiko, Yoshitomi, Kasumi Kaneko, Hamada, Kosuke, Yoneoka, Yusuke, Fujiwara, Motohiro, Fujiwara, Ryo, Oguchi, Tomohiko, Komai, Yoshinobu, Numao, Noboru, Yuasa, Takeshi, Fukui, Iwao, Yonese, Junji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01954-4
_version_ 1783738602970152960
author Fukagawa, Eri
Yamamoto, Shinya
Ohde, Sachiko
Yoshitomi, Kasumi Kaneko
Hamada, Kosuke
Yoneoka, Yusuke
Fujiwara, Motohiro
Fujiwara, Ryo
Oguchi, Tomohiko
Komai, Yoshinobu
Numao, Noboru
Yuasa, Takeshi
Fukui, Iwao
Yonese, Junji
author_facet Fukagawa, Eri
Yamamoto, Shinya
Ohde, Sachiko
Yoshitomi, Kasumi Kaneko
Hamada, Kosuke
Yoneoka, Yusuke
Fujiwara, Motohiro
Fujiwara, Ryo
Oguchi, Tomohiko
Komai, Yoshinobu
Numao, Noboru
Yuasa, Takeshi
Fukui, Iwao
Yonese, Junji
author_sort Fukagawa, Eri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish an external validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a Japanese cohort to preoperatively evaluate the probability of lymph node invasion in patients with high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 278 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection from 2012 to 2020. Patients were rated using the Briganti 2019 nomogram, which evaluates the probability of lymph node invasion. We used the area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis to quantify the accuracy of the nomogram. RESULTS: Nineteen (6.8%) patients had lymph node invasion. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 18. The area under the curve for the Briganti 2019 was 0.71. When the cutoff was set at 7%, 84 (30.2%) patients with extended pelvic lymph node dissection could be omitted, and only 1 (1.2%) patient with lymph node invasion would be missed. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values at the 7% cutoff were 94.7, 32.0, and 98.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This external validation showed that the Briganti 2019 nomogram was accurate, although there may still be scope for individual adjustments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8364898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83648982021-08-19 External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer Fukagawa, Eri Yamamoto, Shinya Ohde, Sachiko Yoshitomi, Kasumi Kaneko Hamada, Kosuke Yoneoka, Yusuke Fujiwara, Motohiro Fujiwara, Ryo Oguchi, Tomohiko Komai, Yoshinobu Numao, Noboru Yuasa, Takeshi Fukui, Iwao Yonese, Junji Int J Clin Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish an external validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a Japanese cohort to preoperatively evaluate the probability of lymph node invasion in patients with high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 278 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection from 2012 to 2020. Patients were rated using the Briganti 2019 nomogram, which evaluates the probability of lymph node invasion. We used the area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis to quantify the accuracy of the nomogram. RESULTS: Nineteen (6.8%) patients had lymph node invasion. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 18. The area under the curve for the Briganti 2019 was 0.71. When the cutoff was set at 7%, 84 (30.2%) patients with extended pelvic lymph node dissection could be omitted, and only 1 (1.2%) patient with lymph node invasion would be missed. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values at the 7% cutoff were 94.7, 32.0, and 98.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This external validation showed that the Briganti 2019 nomogram was accurate, although there may still be scope for individual adjustments. Springer Singapore 2021-06-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8364898/ /pubmed/34117947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01954-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Fukagawa, Eri
Yamamoto, Shinya
Ohde, Sachiko
Yoshitomi, Kasumi Kaneko
Hamada, Kosuke
Yoneoka, Yusuke
Fujiwara, Motohiro
Fujiwara, Ryo
Oguchi, Tomohiko
Komai, Yoshinobu
Numao, Noboru
Yuasa, Takeshi
Fukui, Iwao
Yonese, Junji
External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer
title External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer
title_full External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer
title_fullStr External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer
title_short External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer
title_sort external validation of the briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01954-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fukagawaeri externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT yamamotoshinya externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT ohdesachiko externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT yoshitomikasumikaneko externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT hamadakosuke externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT yoneokayusuke externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT fujiwaramotohiro externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT fujiwararyo externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT oguchitomohiko externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT komaiyoshinobu externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT numaonoboru externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT yuasatakeshi externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT fukuiiwao externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT yonesejunji externalvalidationofthebriganti2019nomogramtoidentifycandidatesforextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionamongpatientswithhighriskclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer