Cargando…

Developing a Tool to Measure Person-Centered Care in Service Planning

Background: Delivering person-centered care is a key component of health care reform. Despite widespread endorsement, medical and behavioral health settings struggle to specify and measure person-centered care objectively. This study presents the validity and reliability of the Person-Centered Care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanhope, Victoria, Baslock, Daniel, Tondora, Janis, Jessell, Lauren, Ross, Abigail M., Marcus, Steven C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681597
_version_ 1783738637787070464
author Stanhope, Victoria
Baslock, Daniel
Tondora, Janis
Jessell, Lauren
Ross, Abigail M.
Marcus, Steven C.
author_facet Stanhope, Victoria
Baslock, Daniel
Tondora, Janis
Jessell, Lauren
Ross, Abigail M.
Marcus, Steven C.
author_sort Stanhope, Victoria
collection PubMed
description Background: Delivering person-centered care is a key component of health care reform. Despite widespread endorsement, medical and behavioral health settings struggle to specify and measure person-centered care objectively. This study presents the validity and reliability of the Person-Centered Care Planning Assessment Measure (PCCP-AM), an objective measure of the extent to which service planning is person-centered. Methods: Based upon the recovery-oriented practice of person-centered care planning, the 10-item PCCP-AM tool rates service plans on the inclusion of service user strengths, personal life goals, natural supports, self-directed actions and the promotion of community integration. As part of a large randomized controlled trial of person-centered care planning, service plans completed by community mental health clinic providers were rated using the PCCP-AM. Reliability was tested by calculating inter-rater reliability across 168 plans and internal consistency across 798 plans. To test concurrent validity, PCCP-AM scores for 84 plans were compared to expert rater scores on a separate instrument. Results: Interrater reliability for each of the 10 PCCP-AM items as measured by Kendall's W ranged from W = 0.77 to W = 0.89 and percent of scores within ± 1 point of each other ranged from 85.7 to 100%. Overall internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's alpha across 798 plans was α = 0.72. Concurrent validity as measured by Kendall's W ranged from W = 0.55 to W = 0.74 and percent of item scores within ± 1 point of expert rater scores ranged from 73.8 to 86.8%. Conclusions: Findings demonstrated that the 10-item PCCP-AM was a valid and reliable objective measure of person-centered care. Using the service plan as an indicator of multiple domains of person-centered care, the measure provides a valuable tool to inform clinical supervision and quality improvement across programs. More psychometric testing is needed to strengthen the measure for research purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8365091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83650912021-08-17 Developing a Tool to Measure Person-Centered Care in Service Planning Stanhope, Victoria Baslock, Daniel Tondora, Janis Jessell, Lauren Ross, Abigail M. Marcus, Steven C. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: Delivering person-centered care is a key component of health care reform. Despite widespread endorsement, medical and behavioral health settings struggle to specify and measure person-centered care objectively. This study presents the validity and reliability of the Person-Centered Care Planning Assessment Measure (PCCP-AM), an objective measure of the extent to which service planning is person-centered. Methods: Based upon the recovery-oriented practice of person-centered care planning, the 10-item PCCP-AM tool rates service plans on the inclusion of service user strengths, personal life goals, natural supports, self-directed actions and the promotion of community integration. As part of a large randomized controlled trial of person-centered care planning, service plans completed by community mental health clinic providers were rated using the PCCP-AM. Reliability was tested by calculating inter-rater reliability across 168 plans and internal consistency across 798 plans. To test concurrent validity, PCCP-AM scores for 84 plans were compared to expert rater scores on a separate instrument. Results: Interrater reliability for each of the 10 PCCP-AM items as measured by Kendall's W ranged from W = 0.77 to W = 0.89 and percent of scores within ± 1 point of each other ranged from 85.7 to 100%. Overall internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's alpha across 798 plans was α = 0.72. Concurrent validity as measured by Kendall's W ranged from W = 0.55 to W = 0.74 and percent of item scores within ± 1 point of expert rater scores ranged from 73.8 to 86.8%. Conclusions: Findings demonstrated that the 10-item PCCP-AM was a valid and reliable objective measure of person-centered care. Using the service plan as an indicator of multiple domains of person-centered care, the measure provides a valuable tool to inform clinical supervision and quality improvement across programs. More psychometric testing is needed to strengthen the measure for research purposes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8365091/ /pubmed/34408678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681597 Text en Copyright © 2021 Stanhope, Baslock, Tondora, Jessell, Ross and Marcus. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Stanhope, Victoria
Baslock, Daniel
Tondora, Janis
Jessell, Lauren
Ross, Abigail M.
Marcus, Steven C.
Developing a Tool to Measure Person-Centered Care in Service Planning
title Developing a Tool to Measure Person-Centered Care in Service Planning
title_full Developing a Tool to Measure Person-Centered Care in Service Planning
title_fullStr Developing a Tool to Measure Person-Centered Care in Service Planning
title_full_unstemmed Developing a Tool to Measure Person-Centered Care in Service Planning
title_short Developing a Tool to Measure Person-Centered Care in Service Planning
title_sort developing a tool to measure person-centered care in service planning
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681597
work_keys_str_mv AT stanhopevictoria developingatooltomeasurepersoncenteredcareinserviceplanning
AT baslockdaniel developingatooltomeasurepersoncenteredcareinserviceplanning
AT tondorajanis developingatooltomeasurepersoncenteredcareinserviceplanning
AT jesselllauren developingatooltomeasurepersoncenteredcareinserviceplanning
AT rossabigailm developingatooltomeasurepersoncenteredcareinserviceplanning
AT marcusstevenc developingatooltomeasurepersoncenteredcareinserviceplanning