Cargando…

A discussion on the minimum required number of tests in two common pooling test methods for SARS-CoV-2

Pooling of samples in detecting the presence of virus is an effective and efficient strategy in screening carriers in a large population with low infection rate, leading to reduction in cost and time. There are a number of pooling test methods, some being simple and others being complicated. In such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, C. H., Chow, C. L., Chow, W. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34340721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821001667
_version_ 1783738645525561344
author Cheng, C. H.
Chow, C. L.
Chow, W. K.
author_facet Cheng, C. H.
Chow, C. L.
Chow, W. K.
author_sort Cheng, C. H.
collection PubMed
description Pooling of samples in detecting the presence of virus is an effective and efficient strategy in screening carriers in a large population with low infection rate, leading to reduction in cost and time. There are a number of pooling test methods, some being simple and others being complicated. In such pooling tests, the most important parameter to decide is the pool or group size, which can be optimised mathematically. Two pooling methods are relatively simple. The minimum numbers required in these two tests for a population with known infection rate are discussed and compared. Results are useful for identifying asymptomatic carriers in a short time and in implementing health codes systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8365137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83651372021-08-16 A discussion on the minimum required number of tests in two common pooling test methods for SARS-CoV-2 Cheng, C. H. Chow, C. L. Chow, W. K. Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Pooling of samples in detecting the presence of virus is an effective and efficient strategy in screening carriers in a large population with low infection rate, leading to reduction in cost and time. There are a number of pooling test methods, some being simple and others being complicated. In such pooling tests, the most important parameter to decide is the pool or group size, which can be optimised mathematically. Two pooling methods are relatively simple. The minimum numbers required in these two tests for a population with known infection rate are discussed and compared. Results are useful for identifying asymptomatic carriers in a short time and in implementing health codes systems. Cambridge University Press 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8365137/ /pubmed/34340721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821001667 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cheng, C. H.
Chow, C. L.
Chow, W. K.
A discussion on the minimum required number of tests in two common pooling test methods for SARS-CoV-2
title A discussion on the minimum required number of tests in two common pooling test methods for SARS-CoV-2
title_full A discussion on the minimum required number of tests in two common pooling test methods for SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr A discussion on the minimum required number of tests in two common pooling test methods for SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed A discussion on the minimum required number of tests in two common pooling test methods for SARS-CoV-2
title_short A discussion on the minimum required number of tests in two common pooling test methods for SARS-CoV-2
title_sort discussion on the minimum required number of tests in two common pooling test methods for sars-cov-2
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34340721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821001667
work_keys_str_mv AT chengch adiscussionontheminimumrequirednumberoftestsintwocommonpoolingtestmethodsforsarscov2
AT chowcl adiscussionontheminimumrequirednumberoftestsintwocommonpoolingtestmethodsforsarscov2
AT chowwk adiscussionontheminimumrequirednumberoftestsintwocommonpoolingtestmethodsforsarscov2
AT chengch discussionontheminimumrequirednumberoftestsintwocommonpoolingtestmethodsforsarscov2
AT chowcl discussionontheminimumrequirednumberoftestsintwocommonpoolingtestmethodsforsarscov2
AT chowwk discussionontheminimumrequirednumberoftestsintwocommonpoolingtestmethodsforsarscov2