Cargando…
Nuclear cGAS: guard or prisoner?
cGAS, an innate immune sensor of cellular stress, recognizes double‐stranded DNA mislocalized in the cytosol upon infection, mitochondrial stress, DNA damage, or malignancy. Early models suggested that cytosolic localization of cGAS prevents autoreactivity to nuclear and mitochondrial self‐DNA, but...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250619 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2021108293 |
_version_ | 1783738670787854336 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira Mann, Carina C Hopfner, Karl‐Peter |
author_facet | de Oliveira Mann, Carina C Hopfner, Karl‐Peter |
author_sort | de Oliveira Mann, Carina C |
collection | PubMed |
description | cGAS, an innate immune sensor of cellular stress, recognizes double‐stranded DNA mislocalized in the cytosol upon infection, mitochondrial stress, DNA damage, or malignancy. Early models suggested that cytosolic localization of cGAS prevents autoreactivity to nuclear and mitochondrial self‐DNA, but this paradigm has shifted in light of recent findings of cGAS as a predominantly nuclear protein tightly bound to chromatin. This has raised the question how nuclear cGAS is kept inactive while being surrounded by chromatin, and what function nuclear localization of cGAS may serve in the first place? Cryo‐EM structures have revealed that cGAS interacts with nucleosomes, the minimal units of chromatin, mainly via histones H2A/H2B, and that these protein–protein interactions block cGAS from DNA binding and thus prevent autoreactivity. Here, we discuss the biological implications of nuclear cGAS and its interaction with chromatin, including various mechanisms for nuclear cGAS inhibition, release of chromatin‐bound cGAS, regulation of different cGAS pools in the cell, and chromatin structure/chromatin protein effects on cGAS activation leading to cGAS‐induced autoimmunity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8365253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83652532021-08-27 Nuclear cGAS: guard or prisoner? de Oliveira Mann, Carina C Hopfner, Karl‐Peter EMBO J Review cGAS, an innate immune sensor of cellular stress, recognizes double‐stranded DNA mislocalized in the cytosol upon infection, mitochondrial stress, DNA damage, or malignancy. Early models suggested that cytosolic localization of cGAS prevents autoreactivity to nuclear and mitochondrial self‐DNA, but this paradigm has shifted in light of recent findings of cGAS as a predominantly nuclear protein tightly bound to chromatin. This has raised the question how nuclear cGAS is kept inactive while being surrounded by chromatin, and what function nuclear localization of cGAS may serve in the first place? Cryo‐EM structures have revealed that cGAS interacts with nucleosomes, the minimal units of chromatin, mainly via histones H2A/H2B, and that these protein–protein interactions block cGAS from DNA binding and thus prevent autoreactivity. Here, we discuss the biological implications of nuclear cGAS and its interaction with chromatin, including various mechanisms for nuclear cGAS inhibition, release of chromatin‐bound cGAS, regulation of different cGAS pools in the cell, and chromatin structure/chromatin protein effects on cGAS activation leading to cGAS‐induced autoimmunity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-12 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8365253/ /pubmed/34250619 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2021108293 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY NC ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review de Oliveira Mann, Carina C Hopfner, Karl‐Peter Nuclear cGAS: guard or prisoner? |
title | Nuclear cGAS: guard or prisoner? |
title_full | Nuclear cGAS: guard or prisoner? |
title_fullStr | Nuclear cGAS: guard or prisoner? |
title_full_unstemmed | Nuclear cGAS: guard or prisoner? |
title_short | Nuclear cGAS: guard or prisoner? |
title_sort | nuclear cgas: guard or prisoner? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250619 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2021108293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveiramanncarinac nuclearcgasguardorprisoner AT hopfnerkarlpeter nuclearcgasguardorprisoner |