Cargando…
Patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Patient–ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a common problem in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU), and may accelerate lung injury and diaphragm mis-contraction. The impact of PVA on clinical outcomes has not been systematically evaluated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00565-5 |
_version_ | 1783738673848647680 |
---|---|
author | Kyo, Michihito Shimatani, Tatsutoshi Hosokawa, Koji Taito, Shunsuke Kataoka, Yuki Ohshimo, Shinichiro Shime, Nobuaki |
author_facet | Kyo, Michihito Shimatani, Tatsutoshi Hosokawa, Koji Taito, Shunsuke Kataoka, Yuki Ohshimo, Shinichiro Shime, Nobuaki |
author_sort | Kyo, Michihito |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient–ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a common problem in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU), and may accelerate lung injury and diaphragm mis-contraction. The impact of PVA on clinical outcomes has not been systematically evaluated. Effective interventions (except for closed-loop ventilation) for reducing PVA are not well established. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of PVA on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MV (Part A) and the effectiveness of interventions for patients undergoing MV except for closed-loop ventilation (Part B). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO-ICTRP until August 2020. In Part A, we defined asynchrony index (AI) ≥ 10 or ineffective triggering index (ITI) ≥ 10 as high PVA. We compared patients having high PVA with those having low PVA. RESULTS: Eight studies in Part A and eight trials in Part B fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In Part A, five studies were related to the AI and three studies were related to the ITI. High PVA may be associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference, 5.16 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.38 to 7.94; n = 8; certainty of evidence [CoE], low), higher ICU mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.73; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.24; n = 6; CoE, low), and higher hospital mortality (OR, 1.94; 95% CI 1.14 to 3.30; n = 5; CoE, low). In Part B, interventions involving MV mode, tidal volume, and pressure-support level were associated with reduced PVA. Sedation protocol, sedation depth, and sedation with dexmedetomidine rather than propofol were also associated with reduced PVA. CONCLUSIONS: PVA may be associated with longer MV duration, higher ICU mortality, and higher hospital mortality. Physicians may consider monitoring PVA and adjusting ventilator settings and sedatives to reduce PVA. Further studies with adjustment for confounding factors are warranted to determine the impact of PVA on clinical outcomes. Trial registration protocols.io (URL: https://www.protocols.io/view/the-impact-of-patient-ventilator-asynchrony-in-adu-bsqtndwn, 08/27/2020). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40560-021-00565-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8365272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83652722021-08-16 Patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis Kyo, Michihito Shimatani, Tatsutoshi Hosokawa, Koji Taito, Shunsuke Kataoka, Yuki Ohshimo, Shinichiro Shime, Nobuaki J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Patient–ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a common problem in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU), and may accelerate lung injury and diaphragm mis-contraction. The impact of PVA on clinical outcomes has not been systematically evaluated. Effective interventions (except for closed-loop ventilation) for reducing PVA are not well established. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of PVA on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MV (Part A) and the effectiveness of interventions for patients undergoing MV except for closed-loop ventilation (Part B). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO-ICTRP until August 2020. In Part A, we defined asynchrony index (AI) ≥ 10 or ineffective triggering index (ITI) ≥ 10 as high PVA. We compared patients having high PVA with those having low PVA. RESULTS: Eight studies in Part A and eight trials in Part B fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In Part A, five studies were related to the AI and three studies were related to the ITI. High PVA may be associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference, 5.16 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.38 to 7.94; n = 8; certainty of evidence [CoE], low), higher ICU mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.73; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.24; n = 6; CoE, low), and higher hospital mortality (OR, 1.94; 95% CI 1.14 to 3.30; n = 5; CoE, low). In Part B, interventions involving MV mode, tidal volume, and pressure-support level were associated with reduced PVA. Sedation protocol, sedation depth, and sedation with dexmedetomidine rather than propofol were also associated with reduced PVA. CONCLUSIONS: PVA may be associated with longer MV duration, higher ICU mortality, and higher hospital mortality. Physicians may consider monitoring PVA and adjusting ventilator settings and sedatives to reduce PVA. Further studies with adjustment for confounding factors are warranted to determine the impact of PVA on clinical outcomes. Trial registration protocols.io (URL: https://www.protocols.io/view/the-impact-of-patient-ventilator-asynchrony-in-adu-bsqtndwn, 08/27/2020). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40560-021-00565-5. BioMed Central 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8365272/ /pubmed/34399855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00565-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kyo, Michihito Shimatani, Tatsutoshi Hosokawa, Koji Taito, Shunsuke Kataoka, Yuki Ohshimo, Shinichiro Shime, Nobuaki Patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00565-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kyomichihito patientventilatorasynchronyimpactonclinicaloutcomesandeffectivenessofinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shimatanitatsutoshi patientventilatorasynchronyimpactonclinicaloutcomesandeffectivenessofinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hosokawakoji patientventilatorasynchronyimpactonclinicaloutcomesandeffectivenessofinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taitoshunsuke patientventilatorasynchronyimpactonclinicaloutcomesandeffectivenessofinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kataokayuki patientventilatorasynchronyimpactonclinicaloutcomesandeffectivenessofinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ohshimoshinichiro patientventilatorasynchronyimpactonclinicaloutcomesandeffectivenessofinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shimenobuaki patientventilatorasynchronyimpactonclinicaloutcomesandeffectivenessofinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |