Cargando…

Validating Patient-Specific Finite Element Models of Direct Electrocortical Stimulation

Direct electrocortical stimulation (DECS) with electrocorticography electrodes is an established therapy for epilepsy and an emerging application for stroke rehabilitation and brain-computer interfaces. However, the electrophysiological mechanisms that result in a therapeutic effect remain unclear....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charlebois, Chantel M., Caldwell, David J., Rampersad, Sumientra M., Janson, Andrew P., Ojemann, Jeffrey G., Brooks, Dana H., MacLeod, Rob S., Butson, Christopher R., Dorval, Alan D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.691701
_version_ 1783738682085212160
author Charlebois, Chantel M.
Caldwell, David J.
Rampersad, Sumientra M.
Janson, Andrew P.
Ojemann, Jeffrey G.
Brooks, Dana H.
MacLeod, Rob S.
Butson, Christopher R.
Dorval, Alan D.
author_facet Charlebois, Chantel M.
Caldwell, David J.
Rampersad, Sumientra M.
Janson, Andrew P.
Ojemann, Jeffrey G.
Brooks, Dana H.
MacLeod, Rob S.
Butson, Christopher R.
Dorval, Alan D.
author_sort Charlebois, Chantel M.
collection PubMed
description Direct electrocortical stimulation (DECS) with electrocorticography electrodes is an established therapy for epilepsy and an emerging application for stroke rehabilitation and brain-computer interfaces. However, the electrophysiological mechanisms that result in a therapeutic effect remain unclear. Patient-specific computational models are promising tools to predict the voltages in the brain and better understand the neural and clinical response to DECS, but the accuracy of such models has not been directly validated in humans. A key hurdle to modeling DECS is accurately locating the electrodes on the cortical surface due to brain shift after electrode implantation. Despite the inherent uncertainty introduced by brain shift, the effects of electrode localization parameters have not been investigated. The goal of this study was to validate patient-specific computational models of DECS against in vivo voltage recordings obtained during DECS and quantify the effects of electrode localization parameters on simulated voltages on the cortical surface. We measured intracranial voltages in six epilepsy patients during DECS and investigated the following electrode localization parameters: principal axis, Hermes, and Dykstra electrode projection methods combined with 0, 1, and 2 mm of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) below the electrodes. Greater CSF depth between the electrode and cortical surface increased model errors and decreased predicted voltage accuracy. The electrode localization parameters that best estimated the recorded voltages across six patients with varying amounts of brain shift were the Hermes projection method and a CSF depth of 0 mm (r = 0.92 and linear regression slope = 1.21). These results are the first to quantify the effects of electrode localization parameters with in vivo intracranial recordings and may serve as the basis for future studies investigating the neuronal and clinical effects of DECS for epilepsy, stroke, and other emerging closed-loop applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8365306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83653062021-08-17 Validating Patient-Specific Finite Element Models of Direct Electrocortical Stimulation Charlebois, Chantel M. Caldwell, David J. Rampersad, Sumientra M. Janson, Andrew P. Ojemann, Jeffrey G. Brooks, Dana H. MacLeod, Rob S. Butson, Christopher R. Dorval, Alan D. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Direct electrocortical stimulation (DECS) with electrocorticography electrodes is an established therapy for epilepsy and an emerging application for stroke rehabilitation and brain-computer interfaces. However, the electrophysiological mechanisms that result in a therapeutic effect remain unclear. Patient-specific computational models are promising tools to predict the voltages in the brain and better understand the neural and clinical response to DECS, but the accuracy of such models has not been directly validated in humans. A key hurdle to modeling DECS is accurately locating the electrodes on the cortical surface due to brain shift after electrode implantation. Despite the inherent uncertainty introduced by brain shift, the effects of electrode localization parameters have not been investigated. The goal of this study was to validate patient-specific computational models of DECS against in vivo voltage recordings obtained during DECS and quantify the effects of electrode localization parameters on simulated voltages on the cortical surface. We measured intracranial voltages in six epilepsy patients during DECS and investigated the following electrode localization parameters: principal axis, Hermes, and Dykstra electrode projection methods combined with 0, 1, and 2 mm of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) below the electrodes. Greater CSF depth between the electrode and cortical surface increased model errors and decreased predicted voltage accuracy. The electrode localization parameters that best estimated the recorded voltages across six patients with varying amounts of brain shift were the Hermes projection method and a CSF depth of 0 mm (r = 0.92 and linear regression slope = 1.21). These results are the first to quantify the effects of electrode localization parameters with in vivo intracranial recordings and may serve as the basis for future studies investigating the neuronal and clinical effects of DECS for epilepsy, stroke, and other emerging closed-loop applications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8365306/ /pubmed/34408621 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.691701 Text en Copyright © 2021 Charlebois, Caldwell, Rampersad, Janson, Ojemann, Brooks, MacLeod, Butson and Dorval. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Charlebois, Chantel M.
Caldwell, David J.
Rampersad, Sumientra M.
Janson, Andrew P.
Ojemann, Jeffrey G.
Brooks, Dana H.
MacLeod, Rob S.
Butson, Christopher R.
Dorval, Alan D.
Validating Patient-Specific Finite Element Models of Direct Electrocortical Stimulation
title Validating Patient-Specific Finite Element Models of Direct Electrocortical Stimulation
title_full Validating Patient-Specific Finite Element Models of Direct Electrocortical Stimulation
title_fullStr Validating Patient-Specific Finite Element Models of Direct Electrocortical Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Validating Patient-Specific Finite Element Models of Direct Electrocortical Stimulation
title_short Validating Patient-Specific Finite Element Models of Direct Electrocortical Stimulation
title_sort validating patient-specific finite element models of direct electrocortical stimulation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.691701
work_keys_str_mv AT charleboischantelm validatingpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofdirectelectrocorticalstimulation
AT caldwelldavidj validatingpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofdirectelectrocorticalstimulation
AT rampersadsumientram validatingpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofdirectelectrocorticalstimulation
AT jansonandrewp validatingpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofdirectelectrocorticalstimulation
AT ojemannjeffreyg validatingpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofdirectelectrocorticalstimulation
AT brooksdanah validatingpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofdirectelectrocorticalstimulation
AT macleodrobs validatingpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofdirectelectrocorticalstimulation
AT butsonchristopherr validatingpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofdirectelectrocorticalstimulation
AT dorvalaland validatingpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofdirectelectrocorticalstimulation