Cargando…

Glaucoma Care of Incarcerated Patients at an Academic Institution: A Case-Control Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate medication and follow-up adherence in incarcerated patients examined at an academic glaucoma clinic, in comparison to nonincarcerated controls. METHODS: Retrospective, case-control study. Consecutive prisoners presenting for initial visits in the Glaucoma Clinic at the Illinois...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanu, Levi N., Oh, Daniel J., Jang, Inae, Henry, Michael, Mehta, Amy A., Dikopf, Mark S., Vajaranant, Thasarat S., Aref, Ahmad A., Edward, Deepak P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34409229
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_207_20
_version_ 1783738735905472512
author Kanu, Levi N.
Oh, Daniel J.
Jang, Inae
Henry, Michael
Mehta, Amy A.
Dikopf, Mark S.
Vajaranant, Thasarat S.
Aref, Ahmad A.
Edward, Deepak P.
author_facet Kanu, Levi N.
Oh, Daniel J.
Jang, Inae
Henry, Michael
Mehta, Amy A.
Dikopf, Mark S.
Vajaranant, Thasarat S.
Aref, Ahmad A.
Edward, Deepak P.
author_sort Kanu, Levi N.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate medication and follow-up adherence in incarcerated patients examined at an academic glaucoma clinic, in comparison to nonincarcerated controls. METHODS: Retrospective, case-control study. Consecutive prisoners presenting for initial visits in the Glaucoma Clinic at the Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary between December 2015 and December 2017 were included in the study. Nonincarcerated patients seen in the same Glaucoma Clinic with similar initial visit dates, age, race, sex, and disease severity were selected as controls. Glaucoma Clinic visits from each patient were reviewed until December 2018. Examination information, surgical intervention, follow-up and treatment recommendations, and patient-reported medication usage were recorded for each visit. Number of visits, loss to follow-up, follow-up delays, and medication nonadherence were studied as primary outcome measures. RESULTS: Twenty-four prisoners and 24 nonincarcerated controls were included. Prisoners had an average of 2.46 ± 2.38 visits during the study period, compared to 5.04 ± 3.25 for controls (P = 0.001). Follow-up visits occurred more than 30 days after the recommended follow-up time in 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44.2%–70.6%) of prisoners, compared to 17.9% (95% CI: 10.2%–25.6%) of controls (P < 0.00001). 70.8% of prisoners (95% CI: 66.3–74.5%) were lost to follow-up, compared to 29.2% of controls (95% CI: 25.5%–32.9%; P < 0.01). Medication nonadherence rates were similar between prisoners (13.6%; 95% CI: 12.1%–15.2%) and controls (12.0%; 95% CI: 11.4%–12.6%; P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Glaucoma follow-up adherence was significantly worse in prisoners compared to a nonincarcerated control population. Further study into causative factors is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8365574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83655742021-08-17 Glaucoma Care of Incarcerated Patients at an Academic Institution: A Case-Control Study Kanu, Levi N. Oh, Daniel J. Jang, Inae Henry, Michael Mehta, Amy A. Dikopf, Mark S. Vajaranant, Thasarat S. Aref, Ahmad A. Edward, Deepak P. J Curr Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate medication and follow-up adherence in incarcerated patients examined at an academic glaucoma clinic, in comparison to nonincarcerated controls. METHODS: Retrospective, case-control study. Consecutive prisoners presenting for initial visits in the Glaucoma Clinic at the Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary between December 2015 and December 2017 were included in the study. Nonincarcerated patients seen in the same Glaucoma Clinic with similar initial visit dates, age, race, sex, and disease severity were selected as controls. Glaucoma Clinic visits from each patient were reviewed until December 2018. Examination information, surgical intervention, follow-up and treatment recommendations, and patient-reported medication usage were recorded for each visit. Number of visits, loss to follow-up, follow-up delays, and medication nonadherence were studied as primary outcome measures. RESULTS: Twenty-four prisoners and 24 nonincarcerated controls were included. Prisoners had an average of 2.46 ± 2.38 visits during the study period, compared to 5.04 ± 3.25 for controls (P = 0.001). Follow-up visits occurred more than 30 days after the recommended follow-up time in 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44.2%–70.6%) of prisoners, compared to 17.9% (95% CI: 10.2%–25.6%) of controls (P < 0.00001). 70.8% of prisoners (95% CI: 66.3–74.5%) were lost to follow-up, compared to 29.2% of controls (95% CI: 25.5%–32.9%; P < 0.01). Medication nonadherence rates were similar between prisoners (13.6%; 95% CI: 12.1%–15.2%) and controls (12.0%; 95% CI: 11.4%–12.6%; P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Glaucoma follow-up adherence was significantly worse in prisoners compared to a nonincarcerated control population. Further study into causative factors is needed. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8365574/ /pubmed/34409229 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_207_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Current Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kanu, Levi N.
Oh, Daniel J.
Jang, Inae
Henry, Michael
Mehta, Amy A.
Dikopf, Mark S.
Vajaranant, Thasarat S.
Aref, Ahmad A.
Edward, Deepak P.
Glaucoma Care of Incarcerated Patients at an Academic Institution: A Case-Control Study
title Glaucoma Care of Incarcerated Patients at an Academic Institution: A Case-Control Study
title_full Glaucoma Care of Incarcerated Patients at an Academic Institution: A Case-Control Study
title_fullStr Glaucoma Care of Incarcerated Patients at an Academic Institution: A Case-Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Glaucoma Care of Incarcerated Patients at an Academic Institution: A Case-Control Study
title_short Glaucoma Care of Incarcerated Patients at an Academic Institution: A Case-Control Study
title_sort glaucoma care of incarcerated patients at an academic institution: a case-control study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34409229
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_207_20
work_keys_str_mv AT kanulevin glaucomacareofincarceratedpatientsatanacademicinstitutionacasecontrolstudy
AT ohdanielj glaucomacareofincarceratedpatientsatanacademicinstitutionacasecontrolstudy
AT janginae glaucomacareofincarceratedpatientsatanacademicinstitutionacasecontrolstudy
AT henrymichael glaucomacareofincarceratedpatientsatanacademicinstitutionacasecontrolstudy
AT mehtaamya glaucomacareofincarceratedpatientsatanacademicinstitutionacasecontrolstudy
AT dikopfmarks glaucomacareofincarceratedpatientsatanacademicinstitutionacasecontrolstudy
AT vajaranantthasarats glaucomacareofincarceratedpatientsatanacademicinstitutionacasecontrolstudy
AT arefahmada glaucomacareofincarceratedpatientsatanacademicinstitutionacasecontrolstudy
AT edwarddeepakp glaucomacareofincarceratedpatientsatanacademicinstitutionacasecontrolstudy