Cargando…

Substrate‐Driven Differences in Tryptophan Catabolism by Gut Microbiota and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation

SCOPE: This study aims to investigate the effect of tryptophan sources on tryptophan catabolism by gut microbiota and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four substrates (free tryptophan, soybean protein, single and clustered soybean cells) containing an equimolar am...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Zhan, Schoones, Tessa, Wells, Jerry M., Fogliano, Vincenzo, Capuano, Edoardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33964185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.202100092
_version_ 1783738746473021440
author Huang, Zhan
Schoones, Tessa
Wells, Jerry M.
Fogliano, Vincenzo
Capuano, Edoardo
author_facet Huang, Zhan
Schoones, Tessa
Wells, Jerry M.
Fogliano, Vincenzo
Capuano, Edoardo
author_sort Huang, Zhan
collection PubMed
description SCOPE: This study aims to investigate the effect of tryptophan sources on tryptophan catabolism by gut microbiota and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four substrates (free tryptophan, soybean protein, single and clustered soybean cells) containing an equimolar amount of tryptophan, but with a different bioaccessibility are studied using in vitro batch fermentation. Tryptophan catabolites are identified by LC‐MS/MS. AhR activity is measured by HepG2‐Lucia AhR reporter cells. The total amount of tryptophan‐derived catabolites increases with decreasing level of substrate complexity. Indole is the major catabolite produced from tryptophan and it is the most abundant in the free tryptophan fermentation. Indole‐3‐acetic acid and indole‐3‐aldehyde are abundantly generated in the soybean protein fermentation. The soybean cell fermentation produced high concentrations of tryptamine. Interestingly, large amounts of short‐chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are also found in the soybean cell and protein fermentation. Both tryptophan‐derived catabolites and SCFAs are able to increase AhR reporter activity over time in all four groups. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that bacterial catabolism of tryptophan and resulting AhR activation in the gut is modulated by the food matrix, suggesting a role for food design to improve gut health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8365636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83656362021-08-23 Substrate‐Driven Differences in Tryptophan Catabolism by Gut Microbiota and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation Huang, Zhan Schoones, Tessa Wells, Jerry M. Fogliano, Vincenzo Capuano, Edoardo Mol Nutr Food Res Research Articles SCOPE: This study aims to investigate the effect of tryptophan sources on tryptophan catabolism by gut microbiota and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four substrates (free tryptophan, soybean protein, single and clustered soybean cells) containing an equimolar amount of tryptophan, but with a different bioaccessibility are studied using in vitro batch fermentation. Tryptophan catabolites are identified by LC‐MS/MS. AhR activity is measured by HepG2‐Lucia AhR reporter cells. The total amount of tryptophan‐derived catabolites increases with decreasing level of substrate complexity. Indole is the major catabolite produced from tryptophan and it is the most abundant in the free tryptophan fermentation. Indole‐3‐acetic acid and indole‐3‐aldehyde are abundantly generated in the soybean protein fermentation. The soybean cell fermentation produced high concentrations of tryptamine. Interestingly, large amounts of short‐chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are also found in the soybean cell and protein fermentation. Both tryptophan‐derived catabolites and SCFAs are able to increase AhR reporter activity over time in all four groups. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that bacterial catabolism of tryptophan and resulting AhR activation in the gut is modulated by the food matrix, suggesting a role for food design to improve gut health. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-19 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8365636/ /pubmed/33964185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.202100092 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Huang, Zhan
Schoones, Tessa
Wells, Jerry M.
Fogliano, Vincenzo
Capuano, Edoardo
Substrate‐Driven Differences in Tryptophan Catabolism by Gut Microbiota and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation
title Substrate‐Driven Differences in Tryptophan Catabolism by Gut Microbiota and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation
title_full Substrate‐Driven Differences in Tryptophan Catabolism by Gut Microbiota and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation
title_fullStr Substrate‐Driven Differences in Tryptophan Catabolism by Gut Microbiota and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation
title_full_unstemmed Substrate‐Driven Differences in Tryptophan Catabolism by Gut Microbiota and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation
title_short Substrate‐Driven Differences in Tryptophan Catabolism by Gut Microbiota and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation
title_sort substrate‐driven differences in tryptophan catabolism by gut microbiota and aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33964185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.202100092
work_keys_str_mv AT huangzhan substratedrivendifferencesintryptophancatabolismbygutmicrobiotaandarylhydrocarbonreceptoractivation
AT schoonestessa substratedrivendifferencesintryptophancatabolismbygutmicrobiotaandarylhydrocarbonreceptoractivation
AT wellsjerrym substratedrivendifferencesintryptophancatabolismbygutmicrobiotaandarylhydrocarbonreceptoractivation
AT foglianovincenzo substratedrivendifferencesintryptophancatabolismbygutmicrobiotaandarylhydrocarbonreceptoractivation
AT capuanoedoardo substratedrivendifferencesintryptophancatabolismbygutmicrobiotaandarylhydrocarbonreceptoractivation