Cargando…

Towards the development of a national patient transfer document between residential and acute care—A pilot study

BACKGROUND: A lack of standardisation of documentation accompanying older people when transferring from residential to acute care is common and this may result in gaps in information and in care for older people. In Ireland, this lack of standardisation prompted the development of an evidence based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuohy, Dympna, Fahy, Anne, O'Doherty, Jane, Meskell, Pauline, O'Reilly, Pauline, O'Brien, Brid, Murphy, Jill, Doody, Owen, Graham, Margaret, Barry, Louise, Kiely, Michelle, O'Keeffe, Jonathon, Dewing, Jan, Lang, Deirdre, Coffey, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33760384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opn.12374
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: A lack of standardisation of documentation accompanying older people when transferring from residential to acute care is common and this may result in gaps in information and in care for older people. In Ireland, this lack of standardisation prompted the development of an evidence based national transfer document. OBJECTIVES: To pilot a new national transfer document for use when transferring older people from residential to acute care and obtain the perceptions of its use from staff in residential and acute care settings. METHODS: This was a pre‐ and post‐study design using purposive sampling following the STROBE guidelines. The pilot was conducted in 26 sites providing residential care and three university hospitals providing acute care. Pre‐pilot questionnaires focused on current documentation and were distributed to staff in residential care (n = 875). A pilot of the new paper‐based transfer document was then conducted over three months and post‐pilot questionnaires distributed to staff from both residential and acute care settings (n = 1085). The findings of the pilot study were discussed with multidisciplinary expert advisory and stakeholder groups who recommended some revisions. This consensus informed the development of the final design of the new revised transfer document. RESULTS: Pre‐pilot: 23% response rate; 83% (n = 168) participants agreed/strongly agreed that existing documentation was straightforward to complete but could be more person‐centred. Post‐pilot: 11% response rate; 75% (n = 93) of participants agreed/strongly agreed that the new transfer document promoted person‐centred care but recommended revisions to the new document regarding layout and time to complete. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted some of the challenges of providing safe, effective and relevant transfer information that is feasible and usable in everyday practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Standardisation and being person‐centred are important determining factors in the provision of relevant up to date information on the resident being transferred.