Cargando…
Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm
We present a comparison of magnetospheric plasma mass/electron density observations during an 11‐day interval which includes the geomagnetic storm of June 22, 2015. For this study we used: Equatorial plasma mass density derived from geomagnetic field line resonances (FLRs) detected by Van Allen Prob...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029292 |
_version_ | 1783738771723780096 |
---|---|
author | Vellante, M. Takahashi, K. Del Corpo, A. Zhelavskaya, I. S. Goldstein, J. Mann, I. R. Pietropaolo, E. Reda, J. Heilig, B. |
author_facet | Vellante, M. Takahashi, K. Del Corpo, A. Zhelavskaya, I. S. Goldstein, J. Mann, I. R. Pietropaolo, E. Reda, J. Heilig, B. |
author_sort | Vellante, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present a comparison of magnetospheric plasma mass/electron density observations during an 11‐day interval which includes the geomagnetic storm of June 22, 2015. For this study we used: Equatorial plasma mass density derived from geomagnetic field line resonances (FLRs) detected by Van Allen Probes and at the ground‐based magnetometer networks EMMA and CARISMA; in situ electron density inferred by the Neural‐network‐based Upper hybrid Resonance Determination algorithm applied to plasma wave Van Allen Probes measurements. The combined observations at L ∼ 4, MLT ∼ 16 of the two longitudinally separated magnetometer networks show a temporal pattern very similar to that of the in situ observations: A density decrease by an order of magnitude about 1 day after the Dst minimum, a partial recovery a few hours later, and a new strong decrease soon after. The observations are consistent with the position of the measurement points with respect to the plasmasphere boundary as derived by a plasmapause test particle simulation. A comparison between plasma mass densities derived from ground and in situ FLR observations during favorable conjunctions shows a good agreement. We find however, for L < ∼3, the spacecraft measurements to be higher than the corresponding ground observations with increasing deviation with decreasing L, which might be related to the rapid outbound spacecraft motion in that region. A statistical analysis of the average ion mass using simultaneous spacecraft measurements of mass and electron density indicates values close to 1 amu in plasmasphere and higher values (∼2–3 amu) in plasmatrough. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8365745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83657452021-08-23 Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm Vellante, M. Takahashi, K. Del Corpo, A. Zhelavskaya, I. S. Goldstein, J. Mann, I. R. Pietropaolo, E. Reda, J. Heilig, B. J Geophys Res Space Phys Research Article We present a comparison of magnetospheric plasma mass/electron density observations during an 11‐day interval which includes the geomagnetic storm of June 22, 2015. For this study we used: Equatorial plasma mass density derived from geomagnetic field line resonances (FLRs) detected by Van Allen Probes and at the ground‐based magnetometer networks EMMA and CARISMA; in situ electron density inferred by the Neural‐network‐based Upper hybrid Resonance Determination algorithm applied to plasma wave Van Allen Probes measurements. The combined observations at L ∼ 4, MLT ∼ 16 of the two longitudinally separated magnetometer networks show a temporal pattern very similar to that of the in situ observations: A density decrease by an order of magnitude about 1 day after the Dst minimum, a partial recovery a few hours later, and a new strong decrease soon after. The observations are consistent with the position of the measurement points with respect to the plasmasphere boundary as derived by a plasmapause test particle simulation. A comparison between plasma mass densities derived from ground and in situ FLR observations during favorable conjunctions shows a good agreement. We find however, for L < ∼3, the spacecraft measurements to be higher than the corresponding ground observations with increasing deviation with decreasing L, which might be related to the rapid outbound spacecraft motion in that region. A statistical analysis of the average ion mass using simultaneous spacecraft measurements of mass and electron density indicates values close to 1 amu in plasmasphere and higher values (∼2–3 amu) in plasmatrough. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-21 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8365745/ /pubmed/34434688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029292 Text en © 2021. The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vellante, M. Takahashi, K. Del Corpo, A. Zhelavskaya, I. S. Goldstein, J. Mann, I. R. Pietropaolo, E. Reda, J. Heilig, B. Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm |
title | Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm |
title_full | Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm |
title_fullStr | Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm |
title_short | Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm |
title_sort | multi‐instrument characterization of magnetospheric cold plasma dynamics in the june 22, 2015 geomagnetic storm |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029292 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vellantem multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm AT takahashik multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm AT delcorpoa multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm AT zhelavskayais multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm AT goldsteinj multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm AT mannir multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm AT pietropaoloe multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm AT redaj multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm AT heiligb multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm |