Cargando…

Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm

We present a comparison of magnetospheric plasma mass/electron density observations during an 11‐day interval which includes the geomagnetic storm of June 22, 2015. For this study we used: Equatorial plasma mass density derived from geomagnetic field line resonances (FLRs) detected by Van Allen Prob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vellante, M., Takahashi, K., Del Corpo, A., Zhelavskaya, I. S., Goldstein, J., Mann, I. R., Pietropaolo, E., Reda, J., Heilig, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029292
_version_ 1783738771723780096
author Vellante, M.
Takahashi, K.
Del Corpo, A.
Zhelavskaya, I. S.
Goldstein, J.
Mann, I. R.
Pietropaolo, E.
Reda, J.
Heilig, B.
author_facet Vellante, M.
Takahashi, K.
Del Corpo, A.
Zhelavskaya, I. S.
Goldstein, J.
Mann, I. R.
Pietropaolo, E.
Reda, J.
Heilig, B.
author_sort Vellante, M.
collection PubMed
description We present a comparison of magnetospheric plasma mass/electron density observations during an 11‐day interval which includes the geomagnetic storm of June 22, 2015. For this study we used: Equatorial plasma mass density derived from geomagnetic field line resonances (FLRs) detected by Van Allen Probes and at the ground‐based magnetometer networks EMMA and CARISMA; in situ electron density inferred by the Neural‐network‐based Upper hybrid Resonance Determination algorithm applied to plasma wave Van Allen Probes measurements. The combined observations at L ∼ 4, MLT ∼ 16 of the two longitudinally separated magnetometer networks show a temporal pattern very similar to that of the in situ observations: A density decrease by an order of magnitude about 1 day after the Dst minimum, a partial recovery a few hours later, and a new strong decrease soon after. The observations are consistent with the position of the measurement points with respect to the plasmasphere boundary as derived by a plasmapause test particle simulation. A comparison between plasma mass densities derived from ground and in situ FLR observations during favorable conjunctions shows a good agreement. We find however, for L < ∼3, the spacecraft measurements to be higher than the corresponding ground observations with increasing deviation with decreasing L, which might be related to the rapid outbound spacecraft motion in that region. A statistical analysis of the average ion mass using simultaneous spacecraft measurements of mass and electron density indicates values close to 1 amu in plasmasphere and higher values (∼2–3 amu) in plasmatrough.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8365745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83657452021-08-23 Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm Vellante, M. Takahashi, K. Del Corpo, A. Zhelavskaya, I. S. Goldstein, J. Mann, I. R. Pietropaolo, E. Reda, J. Heilig, B. J Geophys Res Space Phys Research Article We present a comparison of magnetospheric plasma mass/electron density observations during an 11‐day interval which includes the geomagnetic storm of June 22, 2015. For this study we used: Equatorial plasma mass density derived from geomagnetic field line resonances (FLRs) detected by Van Allen Probes and at the ground‐based magnetometer networks EMMA and CARISMA; in situ electron density inferred by the Neural‐network‐based Upper hybrid Resonance Determination algorithm applied to plasma wave Van Allen Probes measurements. The combined observations at L ∼ 4, MLT ∼ 16 of the two longitudinally separated magnetometer networks show a temporal pattern very similar to that of the in situ observations: A density decrease by an order of magnitude about 1 day after the Dst minimum, a partial recovery a few hours later, and a new strong decrease soon after. The observations are consistent with the position of the measurement points with respect to the plasmasphere boundary as derived by a plasmapause test particle simulation. A comparison between plasma mass densities derived from ground and in situ FLR observations during favorable conjunctions shows a good agreement. We find however, for L < ∼3, the spacecraft measurements to be higher than the corresponding ground observations with increasing deviation with decreasing L, which might be related to the rapid outbound spacecraft motion in that region. A statistical analysis of the average ion mass using simultaneous spacecraft measurements of mass and electron density indicates values close to 1 amu in plasmasphere and higher values (∼2–3 amu) in plasmatrough. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-21 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8365745/ /pubmed/34434688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029292 Text en © 2021. The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vellante, M.
Takahashi, K.
Del Corpo, A.
Zhelavskaya, I. S.
Goldstein, J.
Mann, I. R.
Pietropaolo, E.
Reda, J.
Heilig, B.
Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm
title Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm
title_full Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm
title_fullStr Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm
title_full_unstemmed Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm
title_short Multi‐Instrument Characterization of Magnetospheric Cold Plasma Dynamics in the June 22, 2015 Geomagnetic Storm
title_sort multi‐instrument characterization of magnetospheric cold plasma dynamics in the june 22, 2015 geomagnetic storm
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029292
work_keys_str_mv AT vellantem multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm
AT takahashik multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm
AT delcorpoa multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm
AT zhelavskayais multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm
AT goldsteinj multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm
AT mannir multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm
AT pietropaoloe multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm
AT redaj multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm
AT heiligb multiinstrumentcharacterizationofmagnetosphericcoldplasmadynamicsinthejune222015geomagneticstorm