Cargando…

Variation in Neonatal Nutrition Practice and Implications: A Survey of Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Units

Background: Significant global variation exists in neonatal nutrition practice, including in assigned milk composition values, donor milk usage, fortification regimens, probiotic choice and in methods used to calculate and report nutrition and growth outcomes, making it difficult to synthesize data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLeod, Gemma, Farrent, Shelley, Gilroy, Melissa, Page, Denise, Oliver, Colleen J., Richmond, Fiona, Cormack, Barbara E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34409058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.642474
_version_ 1783738775011065856
author McLeod, Gemma
Farrent, Shelley
Gilroy, Melissa
Page, Denise
Oliver, Colleen J.
Richmond, Fiona
Cormack, Barbara E.
author_facet McLeod, Gemma
Farrent, Shelley
Gilroy, Melissa
Page, Denise
Oliver, Colleen J.
Richmond, Fiona
Cormack, Barbara E.
author_sort McLeod, Gemma
collection PubMed
description Background: Significant global variation exists in neonatal nutrition practice, including in assigned milk composition values, donor milk usage, fortification regimens, probiotic choice and in methods used to calculate and report nutrition and growth outcomes, making it difficult to synthesize data to inform evidence-based, standardized nutritional care that has potential to improve neonatal outcomes. The Australasian Neonatal Dietitians' Network (ANDiN) conducted a survey to determine the degree to which neonatal nutritional care varies across Australia and New Zealand (A&NZ) and to highlight potential implications. Materials and Methods: A two-part electronic neonatal nutritional survey was emailed to each ANDiN member (n = 50). Part-One was designed to examine individual dietetic practice; Part-Two examined site-specific nutrition policies and practices. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the distribution of responses. Results: Survey response rate: 88%. Across 24 NICU sites, maximum fluid targets varied (150–180 mL.kg.d(−1)); macronutrient composition estimates for mothers' own(MOM) and donor (DM) milk varied (Energy (kcal.dL(−1)) MOM: 65–72; DM 69–72: Protein (g.dL(−1)): MOM: 1.0–1.5; DM: 0.8–1.3); pasteurized DM or unpasteurized peer-to-peer DM was not available in all units; milk fortification commenced at different rates and volumes; a range of energy values (kcal.g(−1)) for protein (3.8–4.0), fat (9.0–10.0), and carbohydrate (3.8–4.0) were used to calculate parenteral and enteral intakes; probiotic choice differed; and at least seven different preterm growth charts were employed to monitor growth. Discussion: Our survey identifies variation in preterm nutrition practice across A&NZ of sufficient magnitude to impact nutrition interventions and neonatal outcomes. This presents an opportunity to use the unique skillset of neonatal dietitians to standardize practice, reduce uncertainty of neonatal care and improve the quality of neonatal research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8365759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83657592021-08-17 Variation in Neonatal Nutrition Practice and Implications: A Survey of Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Units McLeod, Gemma Farrent, Shelley Gilroy, Melissa Page, Denise Oliver, Colleen J. Richmond, Fiona Cormack, Barbara E. Front Nutr Nutrition Background: Significant global variation exists in neonatal nutrition practice, including in assigned milk composition values, donor milk usage, fortification regimens, probiotic choice and in methods used to calculate and report nutrition and growth outcomes, making it difficult to synthesize data to inform evidence-based, standardized nutritional care that has potential to improve neonatal outcomes. The Australasian Neonatal Dietitians' Network (ANDiN) conducted a survey to determine the degree to which neonatal nutritional care varies across Australia and New Zealand (A&NZ) and to highlight potential implications. Materials and Methods: A two-part electronic neonatal nutritional survey was emailed to each ANDiN member (n = 50). Part-One was designed to examine individual dietetic practice; Part-Two examined site-specific nutrition policies and practices. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the distribution of responses. Results: Survey response rate: 88%. Across 24 NICU sites, maximum fluid targets varied (150–180 mL.kg.d(−1)); macronutrient composition estimates for mothers' own(MOM) and donor (DM) milk varied (Energy (kcal.dL(−1)) MOM: 65–72; DM 69–72: Protein (g.dL(−1)): MOM: 1.0–1.5; DM: 0.8–1.3); pasteurized DM or unpasteurized peer-to-peer DM was not available in all units; milk fortification commenced at different rates and volumes; a range of energy values (kcal.g(−1)) for protein (3.8–4.0), fat (9.0–10.0), and carbohydrate (3.8–4.0) were used to calculate parenteral and enteral intakes; probiotic choice differed; and at least seven different preterm growth charts were employed to monitor growth. Discussion: Our survey identifies variation in preterm nutrition practice across A&NZ of sufficient magnitude to impact nutrition interventions and neonatal outcomes. This presents an opportunity to use the unique skillset of neonatal dietitians to standardize practice, reduce uncertainty of neonatal care and improve the quality of neonatal research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8365759/ /pubmed/34409058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.642474 Text en Copyright © 2021 McLeod, Farrent, Gilroy, Page, Oliver, Richmond and Cormack. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
McLeod, Gemma
Farrent, Shelley
Gilroy, Melissa
Page, Denise
Oliver, Colleen J.
Richmond, Fiona
Cormack, Barbara E.
Variation in Neonatal Nutrition Practice and Implications: A Survey of Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Units
title Variation in Neonatal Nutrition Practice and Implications: A Survey of Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Units
title_full Variation in Neonatal Nutrition Practice and Implications: A Survey of Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Units
title_fullStr Variation in Neonatal Nutrition Practice and Implications: A Survey of Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Units
title_full_unstemmed Variation in Neonatal Nutrition Practice and Implications: A Survey of Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Units
title_short Variation in Neonatal Nutrition Practice and Implications: A Survey of Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Units
title_sort variation in neonatal nutrition practice and implications: a survey of australia and new zealand neonatal units
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34409058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.642474
work_keys_str_mv AT mcleodgemma variationinneonatalnutritionpracticeandimplicationsasurveyofaustraliaandnewzealandneonatalunits
AT farrentshelley variationinneonatalnutritionpracticeandimplicationsasurveyofaustraliaandnewzealandneonatalunits
AT gilroymelissa variationinneonatalnutritionpracticeandimplicationsasurveyofaustraliaandnewzealandneonatalunits
AT pagedenise variationinneonatalnutritionpracticeandimplicationsasurveyofaustraliaandnewzealandneonatalunits
AT olivercolleenj variationinneonatalnutritionpracticeandimplicationsasurveyofaustraliaandnewzealandneonatalunits
AT richmondfiona variationinneonatalnutritionpracticeandimplicationsasurveyofaustraliaandnewzealandneonatalunits
AT cormackbarbarae variationinneonatalnutritionpracticeandimplicationsasurveyofaustraliaandnewzealandneonatalunits