Cargando…

ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

In metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ESR1 mutations are a common cause of acquired resistance to the backbone of therapy, estrogen deprivation by aromatase inhibition. How these mutations affect tumor sensitivity to established and novel therapies are active areas of research. Thes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brett, Jamie O., Spring, Laura M., Bardia, Aditya, Wander, Seth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34392831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-021-01462-3
_version_ 1783738803742048256
author Brett, Jamie O.
Spring, Laura M.
Bardia, Aditya
Wander, Seth A.
author_facet Brett, Jamie O.
Spring, Laura M.
Bardia, Aditya
Wander, Seth A.
author_sort Brett, Jamie O.
collection PubMed
description In metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ESR1 mutations are a common cause of acquired resistance to the backbone of therapy, estrogen deprivation by aromatase inhibition. How these mutations affect tumor sensitivity to established and novel therapies are active areas of research. These therapies include estrogen receptor-targeting agents, such as selective estrogen receptor modulators, covalent antagonists, and degraders (including tamoxifen, fulvestrant, and novel agents), and combination therapies, such as endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6, PI3K, or mTORC1 inhibition. In this review, we summarize existing knowledge surrounding the mechanisms of action of ESR1 mutations and roles in resistance to aromatase inhibition. We then analyze the recent literature on how ESR1 mutations affect outcomes in estrogen receptor-targeting and combination therapies. For estrogen receptor-targeting therapies such as tamoxifen and fulvestrant, ESR1 mutations cause relative resistance in vitro but do not clearly lead to resistance in patients, making novel agents in this category promising. Regarding combination therapies, ESR1 mutations nullify any aromatase inhibitor component of the combination. Thus, combinations using endocrine alternatives to aromatase inhibition, or combinations where the non-endocrine component is efficacious as monotherapy, are still effective against ESR1 mutations. These results emphasize the importance of investigating combinatorial resistance, challenging as these efforts are. We also discuss future directions and open questions, such as studying the differences among distinct ESR1 mutations, asking how to adjust clinical decisions based on molecular surveillance testing, and developing novel therapies that are effective against ESR1 mutations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8365900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83659002021-08-17 ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer Brett, Jamie O. Spring, Laura M. Bardia, Aditya Wander, Seth A. Breast Cancer Res Review In metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ESR1 mutations are a common cause of acquired resistance to the backbone of therapy, estrogen deprivation by aromatase inhibition. How these mutations affect tumor sensitivity to established and novel therapies are active areas of research. These therapies include estrogen receptor-targeting agents, such as selective estrogen receptor modulators, covalent antagonists, and degraders (including tamoxifen, fulvestrant, and novel agents), and combination therapies, such as endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6, PI3K, or mTORC1 inhibition. In this review, we summarize existing knowledge surrounding the mechanisms of action of ESR1 mutations and roles in resistance to aromatase inhibition. We then analyze the recent literature on how ESR1 mutations affect outcomes in estrogen receptor-targeting and combination therapies. For estrogen receptor-targeting therapies such as tamoxifen and fulvestrant, ESR1 mutations cause relative resistance in vitro but do not clearly lead to resistance in patients, making novel agents in this category promising. Regarding combination therapies, ESR1 mutations nullify any aromatase inhibitor component of the combination. Thus, combinations using endocrine alternatives to aromatase inhibition, or combinations where the non-endocrine component is efficacious as monotherapy, are still effective against ESR1 mutations. These results emphasize the importance of investigating combinatorial resistance, challenging as these efforts are. We also discuss future directions and open questions, such as studying the differences among distinct ESR1 mutations, asking how to adjust clinical decisions based on molecular surveillance testing, and developing novel therapies that are effective against ESR1 mutations. BioMed Central 2021-08-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8365900/ /pubmed/34392831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-021-01462-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Brett, Jamie O.
Spring, Laura M.
Bardia, Aditya
Wander, Seth A.
ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
title ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
title_full ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
title_fullStr ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
title_short ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
title_sort esr1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34392831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-021-01462-3
work_keys_str_mv AT brettjamieo esr1mutationasanemergingclinicalbiomarkerinmetastatichormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT springlauram esr1mutationasanemergingclinicalbiomarkerinmetastatichormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT bardiaaditya esr1mutationasanemergingclinicalbiomarkerinmetastatichormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT wandersetha esr1mutationasanemergingclinicalbiomarkerinmetastatichormonereceptorpositivebreastcancer