Cargando…

Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study

BACKGROUND: The femoral neck system (FNS) may be a valid alternative for treating femoral neck fractures, but few studies have compared the outcomes between FNS and cannulated cancellous screws. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and complications of FNS with those of inverted cannula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Yunfeng, Zhang, Zhen, Wang, Limin, Xiong, Wei, Fang, Qian, Wang, Guanglin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02659-0
_version_ 1783738810134167552
author Tang, Yunfeng
Zhang, Zhen
Wang, Limin
Xiong, Wei
Fang, Qian
Wang, Guanglin
author_facet Tang, Yunfeng
Zhang, Zhen
Wang, Limin
Xiong, Wei
Fang, Qian
Wang, Guanglin
author_sort Tang, Yunfeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The femoral neck system (FNS) may be a valid alternative for treating femoral neck fractures, but few studies have compared the outcomes between FNS and cannulated cancellous screws. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and complications of FNS with those of inverted cannulated cancellous screws (ICCS) for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent FNS or ICCS internal fixation between June 2019 and January 2020. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopies, length of surgical incision, length of hospital stay, time to fracture healing, and other indicators were compared between the two groups. The incidence of complications such as nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, loosening of the internal fixation, and shortening of the femoral neck during follow-up was also assessed in both groups. RESULTS: Among the 92 patients included, 47 and 45 patients were categorized into the FNS and ICCS groups, respectively. Follow-up ranged from 14 to 24 months. There were no significant between-group differences in sex, age, side of the injured limb, and type of fracture and in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and length of hospital stay (all P > 0.05). The incidence of complications such as fracture nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and screw loosening was also comparable between the two groups. However, the number of fluoroscopies was significantly lower in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). The fracture healing time was also significantly lower in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the femoral neck shortening and Harris hip score at the last follow-up were significantly better in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FNS for femoral neck fractures improves hip functional recovery and reduces the femoral neck shortening rate and fluoroscopy exposure postoperatively. Thus, FNS can be an alternative to ICCS for the treatment of femoral neck fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8365927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83659272021-08-17 Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study Tang, Yunfeng Zhang, Zhen Wang, Limin Xiong, Wei Fang, Qian Wang, Guanglin J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The femoral neck system (FNS) may be a valid alternative for treating femoral neck fractures, but few studies have compared the outcomes between FNS and cannulated cancellous screws. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and complications of FNS with those of inverted cannulated cancellous screws (ICCS) for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent FNS or ICCS internal fixation between June 2019 and January 2020. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopies, length of surgical incision, length of hospital stay, time to fracture healing, and other indicators were compared between the two groups. The incidence of complications such as nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, loosening of the internal fixation, and shortening of the femoral neck during follow-up was also assessed in both groups. RESULTS: Among the 92 patients included, 47 and 45 patients were categorized into the FNS and ICCS groups, respectively. Follow-up ranged from 14 to 24 months. There were no significant between-group differences in sex, age, side of the injured limb, and type of fracture and in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and length of hospital stay (all P > 0.05). The incidence of complications such as fracture nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and screw loosening was also comparable between the two groups. However, the number of fluoroscopies was significantly lower in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). The fracture healing time was also significantly lower in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the femoral neck shortening and Harris hip score at the last follow-up were significantly better in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FNS for femoral neck fractures improves hip functional recovery and reduces the femoral neck shortening rate and fluoroscopy exposure postoperatively. Thus, FNS can be an alternative to ICCS for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. BioMed Central 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8365927/ /pubmed/34399801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02659-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tang, Yunfeng
Zhang, Zhen
Wang, Limin
Xiong, Wei
Fang, Qian
Wang, Guanglin
Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study
title Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study
title_full Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study
title_fullStr Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study
title_short Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study
title_sort femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02659-0
work_keys_str_mv AT tangyunfeng femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy
AT zhangzhen femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy
AT wanglimin femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy
AT xiongwei femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy
AT fangqian femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy
AT wangguanglin femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy