Cargando…
Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study
BACKGROUND: The femoral neck system (FNS) may be a valid alternative for treating femoral neck fractures, but few studies have compared the outcomes between FNS and cannulated cancellous screws. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and complications of FNS with those of inverted cannula...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02659-0 |
_version_ | 1783738810134167552 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Yunfeng Zhang, Zhen Wang, Limin Xiong, Wei Fang, Qian Wang, Guanglin |
author_facet | Tang, Yunfeng Zhang, Zhen Wang, Limin Xiong, Wei Fang, Qian Wang, Guanglin |
author_sort | Tang, Yunfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The femoral neck system (FNS) may be a valid alternative for treating femoral neck fractures, but few studies have compared the outcomes between FNS and cannulated cancellous screws. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and complications of FNS with those of inverted cannulated cancellous screws (ICCS) for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent FNS or ICCS internal fixation between June 2019 and January 2020. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopies, length of surgical incision, length of hospital stay, time to fracture healing, and other indicators were compared between the two groups. The incidence of complications such as nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, loosening of the internal fixation, and shortening of the femoral neck during follow-up was also assessed in both groups. RESULTS: Among the 92 patients included, 47 and 45 patients were categorized into the FNS and ICCS groups, respectively. Follow-up ranged from 14 to 24 months. There were no significant between-group differences in sex, age, side of the injured limb, and type of fracture and in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and length of hospital stay (all P > 0.05). The incidence of complications such as fracture nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and screw loosening was also comparable between the two groups. However, the number of fluoroscopies was significantly lower in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). The fracture healing time was also significantly lower in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the femoral neck shortening and Harris hip score at the last follow-up were significantly better in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FNS for femoral neck fractures improves hip functional recovery and reduces the femoral neck shortening rate and fluoroscopy exposure postoperatively. Thus, FNS can be an alternative to ICCS for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8365927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83659272021-08-17 Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study Tang, Yunfeng Zhang, Zhen Wang, Limin Xiong, Wei Fang, Qian Wang, Guanglin J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The femoral neck system (FNS) may be a valid alternative for treating femoral neck fractures, but few studies have compared the outcomes between FNS and cannulated cancellous screws. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and complications of FNS with those of inverted cannulated cancellous screws (ICCS) for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent FNS or ICCS internal fixation between June 2019 and January 2020. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopies, length of surgical incision, length of hospital stay, time to fracture healing, and other indicators were compared between the two groups. The incidence of complications such as nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, loosening of the internal fixation, and shortening of the femoral neck during follow-up was also assessed in both groups. RESULTS: Among the 92 patients included, 47 and 45 patients were categorized into the FNS and ICCS groups, respectively. Follow-up ranged from 14 to 24 months. There were no significant between-group differences in sex, age, side of the injured limb, and type of fracture and in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and length of hospital stay (all P > 0.05). The incidence of complications such as fracture nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and screw loosening was also comparable between the two groups. However, the number of fluoroscopies was significantly lower in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). The fracture healing time was also significantly lower in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the femoral neck shortening and Harris hip score at the last follow-up were significantly better in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FNS for femoral neck fractures improves hip functional recovery and reduces the femoral neck shortening rate and fluoroscopy exposure postoperatively. Thus, FNS can be an alternative to ICCS for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. BioMed Central 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8365927/ /pubmed/34399801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02659-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tang, Yunfeng Zhang, Zhen Wang, Limin Xiong, Wei Fang, Qian Wang, Guanglin Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study |
title | Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study |
title_full | Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study |
title_fullStr | Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study |
title_short | Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study |
title_sort | femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02659-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangyunfeng femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy AT zhangzhen femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy AT wanglimin femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy AT xiongwei femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy AT fangqian femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy AT wangguanglin femoralnecksystemversusinvertedcannulatedcancellousscrewforthetreatmentoffemoralneckfracturesinadultsapreliminarycomparativestudy |