Cargando…
The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation
BACKGROUND: Interest in the application of machine learning (ML) to the design, conduct, and analysis of clinical trials has grown, but the evidence base for such applications has not been surveyed. This manuscript reviews the proceedings of a multi-stakeholder conference to discuss the current and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05489-x |
_version_ | 1783738812639215616 |
---|---|
author | Weissler, E. Hope Naumann, Tristan Andersson, Tomas Ranganath, Rajesh Elemento, Olivier Luo, Yuan Freitag, Daniel F. Benoit, James Hughes, Michael C. Khan, Faisal Slater, Paul Shameer, Khader Roe, Matthew Hutchison, Emmette Kollins, Scott H. Broedl, Uli Meng, Zhaoling Wong, Jennifer L. Curtis, Lesley Huang, Erich Ghassemi, Marzyeh |
author_facet | Weissler, E. Hope Naumann, Tristan Andersson, Tomas Ranganath, Rajesh Elemento, Olivier Luo, Yuan Freitag, Daniel F. Benoit, James Hughes, Michael C. Khan, Faisal Slater, Paul Shameer, Khader Roe, Matthew Hutchison, Emmette Kollins, Scott H. Broedl, Uli Meng, Zhaoling Wong, Jennifer L. Curtis, Lesley Huang, Erich Ghassemi, Marzyeh |
author_sort | Weissler, E. Hope |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Interest in the application of machine learning (ML) to the design, conduct, and analysis of clinical trials has grown, but the evidence base for such applications has not been surveyed. This manuscript reviews the proceedings of a multi-stakeholder conference to discuss the current and future state of ML for clinical research. Key areas of clinical trial methodology in which ML holds particular promise and priority areas for further investigation are presented alongside a narrative review of evidence supporting the use of ML across the clinical trial spectrum. RESULTS: Conference attendees included stakeholders, such as biomedical and ML researchers, representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), artificial intelligence technology and data analytics companies, non-profit organizations, patient advocacy groups, and pharmaceutical companies. ML contributions to clinical research were highlighted in the pre-trial phase, cohort selection and participant management, and data collection and analysis. A particular focus was paid to the operational and philosophical barriers to ML in clinical research. Peer-reviewed evidence was noted to be lacking in several areas. CONCLUSIONS: ML holds great promise for improving the efficiency and quality of clinical research, but substantial barriers remain, the surmounting of which will require addressing significant gaps in evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8365941 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83659412021-08-17 The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation Weissler, E. Hope Naumann, Tristan Andersson, Tomas Ranganath, Rajesh Elemento, Olivier Luo, Yuan Freitag, Daniel F. Benoit, James Hughes, Michael C. Khan, Faisal Slater, Paul Shameer, Khader Roe, Matthew Hutchison, Emmette Kollins, Scott H. Broedl, Uli Meng, Zhaoling Wong, Jennifer L. Curtis, Lesley Huang, Erich Ghassemi, Marzyeh Trials Commentary BACKGROUND: Interest in the application of machine learning (ML) to the design, conduct, and analysis of clinical trials has grown, but the evidence base for such applications has not been surveyed. This manuscript reviews the proceedings of a multi-stakeholder conference to discuss the current and future state of ML for clinical research. Key areas of clinical trial methodology in which ML holds particular promise and priority areas for further investigation are presented alongside a narrative review of evidence supporting the use of ML across the clinical trial spectrum. RESULTS: Conference attendees included stakeholders, such as biomedical and ML researchers, representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), artificial intelligence technology and data analytics companies, non-profit organizations, patient advocacy groups, and pharmaceutical companies. ML contributions to clinical research were highlighted in the pre-trial phase, cohort selection and participant management, and data collection and analysis. A particular focus was paid to the operational and philosophical barriers to ML in clinical research. Peer-reviewed evidence was noted to be lacking in several areas. CONCLUSIONS: ML holds great promise for improving the efficiency and quality of clinical research, but substantial barriers remain, the surmounting of which will require addressing significant gaps in evidence. BioMed Central 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8365941/ /pubmed/34399832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05489-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Weissler, E. Hope Naumann, Tristan Andersson, Tomas Ranganath, Rajesh Elemento, Olivier Luo, Yuan Freitag, Daniel F. Benoit, James Hughes, Michael C. Khan, Faisal Slater, Paul Shameer, Khader Roe, Matthew Hutchison, Emmette Kollins, Scott H. Broedl, Uli Meng, Zhaoling Wong, Jennifer L. Curtis, Lesley Huang, Erich Ghassemi, Marzyeh The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation |
title | The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation |
title_full | The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation |
title_fullStr | The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation |
title_short | The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation |
title_sort | role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05489-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weisslerehope theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT naumanntristan theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT anderssontomas theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT ranganathrajesh theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT elementoolivier theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT luoyuan theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT freitagdanielf theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT benoitjames theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT hughesmichaelc theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT khanfaisal theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT slaterpaul theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT shameerkhader theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT roematthew theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT hutchisonemmette theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT kollinsscotth theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT broedluli theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT mengzhaoling theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT wongjenniferl theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT curtislesley theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT huangerich theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT ghassemimarzyeh theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT weisslerehope roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT naumanntristan roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT anderssontomas roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT ranganathrajesh roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT elementoolivier roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT luoyuan roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT freitagdanielf roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT benoitjames roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT hughesmichaelc roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT khanfaisal roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT slaterpaul roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT shameerkhader roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT roematthew roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT hutchisonemmette roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT kollinsscotth roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT broedluli roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT mengzhaoling roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT wongjenniferl roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT curtislesley roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT huangerich roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration AT ghassemimarzyeh roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration |