Cargando…

The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation

BACKGROUND: Interest in the application of machine learning (ML) to the design, conduct, and analysis of clinical trials has grown, but the evidence base for such applications has not been surveyed. This manuscript reviews the proceedings of a multi-stakeholder conference to discuss the current and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weissler, E. Hope, Naumann, Tristan, Andersson, Tomas, Ranganath, Rajesh, Elemento, Olivier, Luo, Yuan, Freitag, Daniel F., Benoit, James, Hughes, Michael C., Khan, Faisal, Slater, Paul, Shameer, Khader, Roe, Matthew, Hutchison, Emmette, Kollins, Scott H., Broedl, Uli, Meng, Zhaoling, Wong, Jennifer L., Curtis, Lesley, Huang, Erich, Ghassemi, Marzyeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05489-x
_version_ 1783738812639215616
author Weissler, E. Hope
Naumann, Tristan
Andersson, Tomas
Ranganath, Rajesh
Elemento, Olivier
Luo, Yuan
Freitag, Daniel F.
Benoit, James
Hughes, Michael C.
Khan, Faisal
Slater, Paul
Shameer, Khader
Roe, Matthew
Hutchison, Emmette
Kollins, Scott H.
Broedl, Uli
Meng, Zhaoling
Wong, Jennifer L.
Curtis, Lesley
Huang, Erich
Ghassemi, Marzyeh
author_facet Weissler, E. Hope
Naumann, Tristan
Andersson, Tomas
Ranganath, Rajesh
Elemento, Olivier
Luo, Yuan
Freitag, Daniel F.
Benoit, James
Hughes, Michael C.
Khan, Faisal
Slater, Paul
Shameer, Khader
Roe, Matthew
Hutchison, Emmette
Kollins, Scott H.
Broedl, Uli
Meng, Zhaoling
Wong, Jennifer L.
Curtis, Lesley
Huang, Erich
Ghassemi, Marzyeh
author_sort Weissler, E. Hope
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interest in the application of machine learning (ML) to the design, conduct, and analysis of clinical trials has grown, but the evidence base for such applications has not been surveyed. This manuscript reviews the proceedings of a multi-stakeholder conference to discuss the current and future state of ML for clinical research. Key areas of clinical trial methodology in which ML holds particular promise and priority areas for further investigation are presented alongside a narrative review of evidence supporting the use of ML across the clinical trial spectrum. RESULTS: Conference attendees included stakeholders, such as biomedical and ML researchers, representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), artificial intelligence technology and data analytics companies, non-profit organizations, patient advocacy groups, and pharmaceutical companies. ML contributions to clinical research were highlighted in the pre-trial phase, cohort selection and participant management, and data collection and analysis. A particular focus was paid to the operational and philosophical barriers to ML in clinical research. Peer-reviewed evidence was noted to be lacking in several areas. CONCLUSIONS: ML holds great promise for improving the efficiency and quality of clinical research, but substantial barriers remain, the surmounting of which will require addressing significant gaps in evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8365941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83659412021-08-17 The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation Weissler, E. Hope Naumann, Tristan Andersson, Tomas Ranganath, Rajesh Elemento, Olivier Luo, Yuan Freitag, Daniel F. Benoit, James Hughes, Michael C. Khan, Faisal Slater, Paul Shameer, Khader Roe, Matthew Hutchison, Emmette Kollins, Scott H. Broedl, Uli Meng, Zhaoling Wong, Jennifer L. Curtis, Lesley Huang, Erich Ghassemi, Marzyeh Trials Commentary BACKGROUND: Interest in the application of machine learning (ML) to the design, conduct, and analysis of clinical trials has grown, but the evidence base for such applications has not been surveyed. This manuscript reviews the proceedings of a multi-stakeholder conference to discuss the current and future state of ML for clinical research. Key areas of clinical trial methodology in which ML holds particular promise and priority areas for further investigation are presented alongside a narrative review of evidence supporting the use of ML across the clinical trial spectrum. RESULTS: Conference attendees included stakeholders, such as biomedical and ML researchers, representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), artificial intelligence technology and data analytics companies, non-profit organizations, patient advocacy groups, and pharmaceutical companies. ML contributions to clinical research were highlighted in the pre-trial phase, cohort selection and participant management, and data collection and analysis. A particular focus was paid to the operational and philosophical barriers to ML in clinical research. Peer-reviewed evidence was noted to be lacking in several areas. CONCLUSIONS: ML holds great promise for improving the efficiency and quality of clinical research, but substantial barriers remain, the surmounting of which will require addressing significant gaps in evidence. BioMed Central 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8365941/ /pubmed/34399832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05489-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Weissler, E. Hope
Naumann, Tristan
Andersson, Tomas
Ranganath, Rajesh
Elemento, Olivier
Luo, Yuan
Freitag, Daniel F.
Benoit, James
Hughes, Michael C.
Khan, Faisal
Slater, Paul
Shameer, Khader
Roe, Matthew
Hutchison, Emmette
Kollins, Scott H.
Broedl, Uli
Meng, Zhaoling
Wong, Jennifer L.
Curtis, Lesley
Huang, Erich
Ghassemi, Marzyeh
The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation
title The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation
title_full The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation
title_fullStr The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation
title_full_unstemmed The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation
title_short The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation
title_sort role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05489-x
work_keys_str_mv AT weisslerehope theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT naumanntristan theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT anderssontomas theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT ranganathrajesh theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT elementoolivier theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT luoyuan theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT freitagdanielf theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT benoitjames theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT hughesmichaelc theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT khanfaisal theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT slaterpaul theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT shameerkhader theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT roematthew theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT hutchisonemmette theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT kollinsscotth theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT broedluli theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT mengzhaoling theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT wongjenniferl theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT curtislesley theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT huangerich theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT ghassemimarzyeh theroleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT weisslerehope roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT naumanntristan roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT anderssontomas roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT ranganathrajesh roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT elementoolivier roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT luoyuan roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT freitagdanielf roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT benoitjames roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT hughesmichaelc roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT khanfaisal roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT slaterpaul roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT shameerkhader roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT roematthew roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT hutchisonemmette roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT kollinsscotth roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT broedluli roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT mengzhaoling roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT wongjenniferl roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT curtislesley roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT huangerich roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration
AT ghassemimarzyeh roleofmachinelearninginclinicalresearchtransformingthefutureofevidencegeneration