Cargando…
Investigation of the clinical inter-observer bias in prostate fiducial marker image registration between CT and MR images
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inter-modality image registration between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images is associated with systematic uncertainties and the magnitude of these uncertainties is not well documented. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential uncert...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01865-8 |
_version_ | 1783738818383314944 |
---|---|
author | Persson, Emilia Emin, Sevgi Scherman, Jonas Jamtheim Gustafsson , Christian Brynolfsson, Patrik Ceberg, Sofie Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn Olsson, Lars E. |
author_facet | Persson, Emilia Emin, Sevgi Scherman, Jonas Jamtheim Gustafsson , Christian Brynolfsson, Patrik Ceberg, Sofie Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn Olsson, Lars E. |
author_sort | Persson, Emilia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inter-modality image registration between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images is associated with systematic uncertainties and the magnitude of these uncertainties is not well documented. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential uncertainty of gold fiducial marker (GFM) registration for localized prostate cancer and to estimate the inter-observer bias in a clinical setting. METHODS: Four experienced observers registered CT and MR images for 42 prostate cancer patients. Manual GFM identification was followed by a landmark-based registration. The absolute difference between observers in GFM identification and the displacement of the clinical target volume (CTV) was investigated. The CTV center of mass (CoM) vector displacements, DICE-index and Hausdorff distances for the observer registrations were compared against a clinical baseline registration. The time allocated for the manual registrations was compared. RESULTS: Absolute difference in GFM identification between observers ranged from 0.0 to 3.0 mm. The maximum CTV CoM displacement from the clinical baseline was 3.1 mm. Displacements larger than or equal to 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm were 46%, 18% and 4%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was detected between observers in terms of CTV displacement. Median DICE-index and Hausdorff distance for the CTV, with their respective ranges were 0.94 [0.70–1.00] and 2.5 mm [0.7–8.7]. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of CT and MR images using GFMs for localized prostate cancer patients was subject to inter-observer bias on an individual patient level. A CTV displacement as large as 3 mm occurred for individual patients. These results show that GFM registration in a clinical setting is associated with uncertainties, which motivates the removal of inter-modality registrations in the radiotherapy workflow and a transition to an MRI-only workflow for localized prostate cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8365967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83659672021-08-17 Investigation of the clinical inter-observer bias in prostate fiducial marker image registration between CT and MR images Persson, Emilia Emin, Sevgi Scherman, Jonas Jamtheim Gustafsson , Christian Brynolfsson, Patrik Ceberg, Sofie Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn Olsson, Lars E. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inter-modality image registration between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images is associated with systematic uncertainties and the magnitude of these uncertainties is not well documented. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential uncertainty of gold fiducial marker (GFM) registration for localized prostate cancer and to estimate the inter-observer bias in a clinical setting. METHODS: Four experienced observers registered CT and MR images for 42 prostate cancer patients. Manual GFM identification was followed by a landmark-based registration. The absolute difference between observers in GFM identification and the displacement of the clinical target volume (CTV) was investigated. The CTV center of mass (CoM) vector displacements, DICE-index and Hausdorff distances for the observer registrations were compared against a clinical baseline registration. The time allocated for the manual registrations was compared. RESULTS: Absolute difference in GFM identification between observers ranged from 0.0 to 3.0 mm. The maximum CTV CoM displacement from the clinical baseline was 3.1 mm. Displacements larger than or equal to 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm were 46%, 18% and 4%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was detected between observers in terms of CTV displacement. Median DICE-index and Hausdorff distance for the CTV, with their respective ranges were 0.94 [0.70–1.00] and 2.5 mm [0.7–8.7]. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of CT and MR images using GFMs for localized prostate cancer patients was subject to inter-observer bias on an individual patient level. A CTV displacement as large as 3 mm occurred for individual patients. These results show that GFM registration in a clinical setting is associated with uncertainties, which motivates the removal of inter-modality registrations in the radiotherapy workflow and a transition to an MRI-only workflow for localized prostate cancer. BioMed Central 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8365967/ /pubmed/34399806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01865-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Persson, Emilia Emin, Sevgi Scherman, Jonas Jamtheim Gustafsson , Christian Brynolfsson, Patrik Ceberg, Sofie Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn Olsson, Lars E. Investigation of the clinical inter-observer bias in prostate fiducial marker image registration between CT and MR images |
title | Investigation of the clinical inter-observer bias in prostate fiducial marker image registration between CT and MR images |
title_full | Investigation of the clinical inter-observer bias in prostate fiducial marker image registration between CT and MR images |
title_fullStr | Investigation of the clinical inter-observer bias in prostate fiducial marker image registration between CT and MR images |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigation of the clinical inter-observer bias in prostate fiducial marker image registration between CT and MR images |
title_short | Investigation of the clinical inter-observer bias in prostate fiducial marker image registration between CT and MR images |
title_sort | investigation of the clinical inter-observer bias in prostate fiducial marker image registration between ct and mr images |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8365967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34399806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01865-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perssonemilia investigationoftheclinicalinterobserverbiasinprostatefiducialmarkerimageregistrationbetweenctandmrimages AT eminsevgi investigationoftheclinicalinterobserverbiasinprostatefiducialmarkerimageregistrationbetweenctandmrimages AT schermanjonas investigationoftheclinicalinterobserverbiasinprostatefiducialmarkerimageregistrationbetweenctandmrimages AT jamtheimgustafssonchristian investigationoftheclinicalinterobserverbiasinprostatefiducialmarkerimageregistrationbetweenctandmrimages AT brynolfssonpatrik investigationoftheclinicalinterobserverbiasinprostatefiducialmarkerimageregistrationbetweenctandmrimages AT cebergsofie investigationoftheclinicalinterobserverbiasinprostatefiducialmarkerimageregistrationbetweenctandmrimages AT gunnlaugssonadalsteinn investigationoftheclinicalinterobserverbiasinprostatefiducialmarkerimageregistrationbetweenctandmrimages AT olssonlarse investigationoftheclinicalinterobserverbiasinprostatefiducialmarkerimageregistrationbetweenctandmrimages |