Cargando…
Endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia
Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is one of the uncommon causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Major treatment of GAVE includes pharmacotherapy, endoscopy, and surgery. The efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy have not been sufficiently confirmed; and surgery is just considered when cons...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223211039696 |
_version_ | 1783738843621490688 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Mengyuan Guo, Xiaozhong Yi, Fangfang Shao, Xiaodong Wang, Le Wu, Yanyan Wang, Chunmei Zhu, Menghua Bian, Ou Ibrahim, Mostafa Chawla, Saurabh Qi, Xingshun |
author_facet | Peng, Mengyuan Guo, Xiaozhong Yi, Fangfang Shao, Xiaodong Wang, Le Wu, Yanyan Wang, Chunmei Zhu, Menghua Bian, Ou Ibrahim, Mostafa Chawla, Saurabh Qi, Xingshun |
author_sort | Peng, Mengyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is one of the uncommon causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Major treatment of GAVE includes pharmacotherapy, endoscopy, and surgery. The efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy have not been sufficiently confirmed; and surgery is just considered when conservative treatment is ineffective. By comparison, endoscopy is a common treatment option for GAVE. This paper reviews the currently used endoscopic approaches for GAVE, mainly including argon plasma coagulation (APC), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and endoscopic band ligation (EBL). It also summarizes their efficacy and procedure-related adverse events. The endoscopic success rate of APC is 40–100%; however, APC needs several treatment sessions, with a high recurrence rate of 10–78.9%. The endoscopic success rates of RFA and EBL are 90–100% and 77.8–100%, respectively; and their recurrence rates are 21.4–33.3% and 8.3–48.1%, respectively. Hyperplastic gastric polyps and sepsis are major adverse events of APC and RFA; and Mallory–Weiss syndrome is occasionally observed after APC. Adverse events of EBL are rare and mild, such as nausea, vomiting, esophageal or abdominal pain, and hyperplastic polyps. APC is often considered as the first-line choice of endoscopic treatment for GAVE. RFA and EBL have been increasingly used as alternatives in patients with refractory GAVE. A high recurrence of GAVE after endoscopic treatment should be fully recognized and cautiously managed by follow-up endoscopy. In future, a head-to-head comparison of different endoscopic approaches for GAVE is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8366108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83661082021-08-17 Endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia Peng, Mengyuan Guo, Xiaozhong Yi, Fangfang Shao, Xiaodong Wang, Le Wu, Yanyan Wang, Chunmei Zhu, Menghua Bian, Ou Ibrahim, Mostafa Chawla, Saurabh Qi, Xingshun Ther Adv Chronic Dis Review Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is one of the uncommon causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Major treatment of GAVE includes pharmacotherapy, endoscopy, and surgery. The efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy have not been sufficiently confirmed; and surgery is just considered when conservative treatment is ineffective. By comparison, endoscopy is a common treatment option for GAVE. This paper reviews the currently used endoscopic approaches for GAVE, mainly including argon plasma coagulation (APC), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and endoscopic band ligation (EBL). It also summarizes their efficacy and procedure-related adverse events. The endoscopic success rate of APC is 40–100%; however, APC needs several treatment sessions, with a high recurrence rate of 10–78.9%. The endoscopic success rates of RFA and EBL are 90–100% and 77.8–100%, respectively; and their recurrence rates are 21.4–33.3% and 8.3–48.1%, respectively. Hyperplastic gastric polyps and sepsis are major adverse events of APC and RFA; and Mallory–Weiss syndrome is occasionally observed after APC. Adverse events of EBL are rare and mild, such as nausea, vomiting, esophageal or abdominal pain, and hyperplastic polyps. APC is often considered as the first-line choice of endoscopic treatment for GAVE. RFA and EBL have been increasingly used as alternatives in patients with refractory GAVE. A high recurrence of GAVE after endoscopic treatment should be fully recognized and cautiously managed by follow-up endoscopy. In future, a head-to-head comparison of different endoscopic approaches for GAVE is warranted. SAGE Publications 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8366108/ /pubmed/34408826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223211039696 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Peng, Mengyuan Guo, Xiaozhong Yi, Fangfang Shao, Xiaodong Wang, Le Wu, Yanyan Wang, Chunmei Zhu, Menghua Bian, Ou Ibrahim, Mostafa Chawla, Saurabh Qi, Xingshun Endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title | Endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title_full | Endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title_short | Endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia |
title_sort | endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223211039696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengmengyuan endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia AT guoxiaozhong endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia AT yifangfang endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia AT shaoxiaodong endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia AT wangle endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia AT wuyanyan endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia AT wangchunmei endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia AT zhumenghua endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia AT bianou endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia AT ibrahimmostafa endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia AT chawlasaurabh endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia AT qixingshun endoscopictreatmentforgastricantralvascularectasia |