Cargando…
Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up
Cancer staging is the process determining to which extent a cancer has spread and where it is located in the body. A thorough staging is of utmost importance, not only because it provides the most accurate prognostic estimation, but also because several crucial decisions, such as the treatment choic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mattioli 1885
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447611 http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.11S1a162S |
_version_ | 1783738875635564544 |
---|---|
author | Papageorgiou, Chryssoula Apalla, Zoe Manoli, Sofia-Magdalini Lallas, Konstantinos Vakirlis, Efstratios Lallas, Aimilios |
author_facet | Papageorgiou, Chryssoula Apalla, Zoe Manoli, Sofia-Magdalini Lallas, Konstantinos Vakirlis, Efstratios Lallas, Aimilios |
author_sort | Papageorgiou, Chryssoula |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cancer staging is the process determining to which extent a cancer has spread and where it is located in the body. A thorough staging is of utmost importance, not only because it provides the most accurate prognostic estimation, but also because several crucial decisions, such as the treatment choice and the follow-up strategy, vary according to the tumor’s stage. The current staging system for melanoma is based on the 8(th) edition of TNM classification issued by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) in 2017. It includes a clinical and a pathological staging, both consisting of 5 stages (0–IV). The stage of a melanoma is determined by several factors, among which the Breslow thickness, the pathological presence or absence of ulceration in the primary tumor, the presence and the number of tumor-involved regional lymph nodes, the presence or absence of in-transit, satellite and/or microsatellite metastases, and the presence of distant metastases. Following melanoma diagnosis, an accurate medical workup, in line with the stage and the physical examination, should be performed. A continuous patient monitoring is fundamental to detect a potential relapse or a second primary melanoma and should be lifelong. However, there is still no universally adopted follow-up strategy program and different follow-up schemes have been suggested. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate different follow-up protocols according to the adopted therapy, as novel recent therapies (targeted and immunotherapies) are being increasingly used. KEY MESSAGES: Proper staging is of utmost importance because it provides accurate prognostic estimation. Several crucial decisions, such as the treatment choice and the follow up strategy, are based on the tumor stage. Physical examination during staging procedure and follow-up visits are important to avoid unnecessary imaging and laboratory tests that could increase the patients’ anxiety. A personalized approach taking into consideration the patient’s risk factors, is strongly recommended. Melanoma patients should be kept under surveillance lifelong due to an increased risk of developing a second primary melanoma and the risk of recurrence. Higher intensity follow-up strategies during the first 5 years are recommended due to higher rates of regional or distant relapse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8366306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Mattioli 1885 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83663062021-08-25 Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up Papageorgiou, Chryssoula Apalla, Zoe Manoli, Sofia-Magdalini Lallas, Konstantinos Vakirlis, Efstratios Lallas, Aimilios Dermatol Pract Concept Review Cancer staging is the process determining to which extent a cancer has spread and where it is located in the body. A thorough staging is of utmost importance, not only because it provides the most accurate prognostic estimation, but also because several crucial decisions, such as the treatment choice and the follow-up strategy, vary according to the tumor’s stage. The current staging system for melanoma is based on the 8(th) edition of TNM classification issued by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) in 2017. It includes a clinical and a pathological staging, both consisting of 5 stages (0–IV). The stage of a melanoma is determined by several factors, among which the Breslow thickness, the pathological presence or absence of ulceration in the primary tumor, the presence and the number of tumor-involved regional lymph nodes, the presence or absence of in-transit, satellite and/or microsatellite metastases, and the presence of distant metastases. Following melanoma diagnosis, an accurate medical workup, in line with the stage and the physical examination, should be performed. A continuous patient monitoring is fundamental to detect a potential relapse or a second primary melanoma and should be lifelong. However, there is still no universally adopted follow-up strategy program and different follow-up schemes have been suggested. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate different follow-up protocols according to the adopted therapy, as novel recent therapies (targeted and immunotherapies) are being increasingly used. KEY MESSAGES: Proper staging is of utmost importance because it provides accurate prognostic estimation. Several crucial decisions, such as the treatment choice and the follow up strategy, are based on the tumor stage. Physical examination during staging procedure and follow-up visits are important to avoid unnecessary imaging and laboratory tests that could increase the patients’ anxiety. A personalized approach taking into consideration the patient’s risk factors, is strongly recommended. Melanoma patients should be kept under surveillance lifelong due to an increased risk of developing a second primary melanoma and the risk of recurrence. Higher intensity follow-up strategies during the first 5 years are recommended due to higher rates of regional or distant relapse. Mattioli 1885 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8366306/ /pubmed/34447611 http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.11S1a162S Text en ©2021 Papageorgiou et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License BY-NC-4.0, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Papageorgiou, Chryssoula Apalla, Zoe Manoli, Sofia-Magdalini Lallas, Konstantinos Vakirlis, Efstratios Lallas, Aimilios Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up |
title | Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up |
title_full | Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up |
title_fullStr | Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up |
title_full_unstemmed | Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up |
title_short | Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up |
title_sort | melanoma: staging and follow-up |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447611 http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.11S1a162S |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papageorgiouchryssoula melanomastagingandfollowup AT apallazoe melanomastagingandfollowup AT manolisofiamagdalini melanomastagingandfollowup AT lallaskonstantinos melanomastagingandfollowup AT vakirlisefstratios melanomastagingandfollowup AT lallasaimilios melanomastagingandfollowup |