Cargando…
Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginary
Gene-editing technologies, ie those able to make changes in the DNA of an organism, are the object of global competition and a regulatory race between countries and regions. There is an attempt to craft legal frameworks protective enough for users, but flexible enough for developers of gene-editing...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa080 |
_version_ | 1783738936143642624 |
---|---|
author | Mahalatchimy, Aurélie Lau, Pin Lean Li, Phoebe Flear, Mark L |
author_facet | Mahalatchimy, Aurélie Lau, Pin Lean Li, Phoebe Flear, Mark L |
author_sort | Mahalatchimy, Aurélie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gene-editing technologies, ie those able to make changes in the DNA of an organism, are the object of global competition and a regulatory race between countries and regions. There is an attempt to craft legal frameworks protective enough for users, but flexible enough for developers of gene-editing technologies. This article examines the imaginary built into the framing of EU-level legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies and identifies its three key related facets: the tension around naturalness; safeguarding morality and ethics; and the pursuit of medical objectives for the protection of human health. Concerns around the use of gene-editing technologies in relation to eugenics and human enhancement have produced a multifaceted imaginary. We argue that this imaginary not only places a limit on EU-level regulation, despite a strong EU competence in respect of the internal market, but also seeks to ensure its legitimation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8366714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83667142021-08-17 Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginary Mahalatchimy, Aurélie Lau, Pin Lean Li, Phoebe Flear, Mark L J Law Biosci Original Article Gene-editing technologies, ie those able to make changes in the DNA of an organism, are the object of global competition and a regulatory race between countries and regions. There is an attempt to craft legal frameworks protective enough for users, but flexible enough for developers of gene-editing technologies. This article examines the imaginary built into the framing of EU-level legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies and identifies its three key related facets: the tension around naturalness; safeguarding morality and ethics; and the pursuit of medical objectives for the protection of human health. Concerns around the use of gene-editing technologies in relation to eugenics and human enhancement have produced a multifaceted imaginary. We argue that this imaginary not only places a limit on EU-level regulation, despite a strong EU competence in respect of the internal market, but also seeks to ensure its legitimation. Oxford University Press 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8366714/ /pubmed/34408900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa080 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mahalatchimy, Aurélie Lau, Pin Lean Li, Phoebe Flear, Mark L Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginary |
title | Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginary |
title_full | Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginary |
title_fullStr | Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginary |
title_full_unstemmed | Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginary |
title_short | Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginary |
title_sort | framing and legitimating eu legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginary |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahalatchimyaurelie framingandlegitimatingeulegalregulationofhumangeneeditingtechnologieskeyfacetsandfunctionsofanimaginary AT laupinlean framingandlegitimatingeulegalregulationofhumangeneeditingtechnologieskeyfacetsandfunctionsofanimaginary AT liphoebe framingandlegitimatingeulegalregulationofhumangeneeditingtechnologieskeyfacetsandfunctionsofanimaginary AT flearmarkl framingandlegitimatingeulegalregulationofhumangeneeditingtechnologieskeyfacetsandfunctionsofanimaginary |