Cargando…

Can Dynamic Imaging, Using (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CT Perfusion Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Nodules?

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to derive and compare metabolic parameters relating to benign and malignant pulmonary nodules using dynamic 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/CT, and nodule perfusion parameters derived through perfusion computed tomography (CT). PATIENTS AN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marin, Aleksander, Murchison, John T., Skwarski, Kristopher M., Tavares, Adriana A.S., Fletcher, Alison, Wallace, William A., Salapura, Vladka, van Beek, Edwin J.R., Mirsadraee, Saeed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34051709
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2021-0024
_version_ 1783738940621062144
author Marin, Aleksander
Murchison, John T.
Skwarski, Kristopher M.
Tavares, Adriana A.S.
Fletcher, Alison
Wallace, William A.
Salapura, Vladka
van Beek, Edwin J.R.
Mirsadraee, Saeed
author_facet Marin, Aleksander
Murchison, John T.
Skwarski, Kristopher M.
Tavares, Adriana A.S.
Fletcher, Alison
Wallace, William A.
Salapura, Vladka
van Beek, Edwin J.R.
Mirsadraee, Saeed
author_sort Marin, Aleksander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to derive and compare metabolic parameters relating to benign and malignant pulmonary nodules using dynamic 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/CT, and nodule perfusion parameters derived through perfusion computed tomography (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with 21 pulmonary nodules incidentally detected on CT underwent a dynamic (18)F-FDG PET/CT and a perfusion CT. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) was measured on conventional (18)F-FDG PET/CT images. The influx constant (K(i)) was calculated from the dynamic (18)F-FDG PET/CT data using Patlak model. Arterial flow (AF) using the maximum slope model and blood volume (BV) using the Patlak plot method for each nodule were calculated from the perfusion CT data. All nodules were characterized as malignant or benign based on histopathology or 2 year follow up CT. All parameters were statistically compared between the two groups using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Twelve malignant and 9 benign lung nodules were analysed (median size 20.1 mm, 9–29 mm) in 21 patients (male/female = 11/9; mean age ± SD: 65.3 ± 7.4; age range: 50–76 years). The average SUV(max) values ± SD of the benign and malignant nodules were 2.2 ± 1.7 vs. 7.0 ± 4.5, respectively (p = 0.0148). Average K(i) values in benign and malignant nodules were 0.0057 ± 0.0071 and 0.0230 ± 0.0155 min(-1), respectively (p = 0.0311). Average BV for the benign and malignant nodules were 11.6857 ± 6.7347 and 28.3400 ± 15.9672 ml/100 ml, respectively (p = 0.0250). Average AF for the benign and malignant nodules were 74.4571 ± 89.0321 and 89.200 ± 49.8883 ml/100g/min, respectively (p = 0.1613). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic (18)F-FDG PET/CT and perfusion CT derived blood volume had similar capability to differentiate benign from malignant lung nodules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8366734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83667342021-09-01 Can Dynamic Imaging, Using (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CT Perfusion Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Nodules? Marin, Aleksander Murchison, John T. Skwarski, Kristopher M. Tavares, Adriana A.S. Fletcher, Alison Wallace, William A. Salapura, Vladka van Beek, Edwin J.R. Mirsadraee, Saeed Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to derive and compare metabolic parameters relating to benign and malignant pulmonary nodules using dynamic 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/CT, and nodule perfusion parameters derived through perfusion computed tomography (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with 21 pulmonary nodules incidentally detected on CT underwent a dynamic (18)F-FDG PET/CT and a perfusion CT. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) was measured on conventional (18)F-FDG PET/CT images. The influx constant (K(i)) was calculated from the dynamic (18)F-FDG PET/CT data using Patlak model. Arterial flow (AF) using the maximum slope model and blood volume (BV) using the Patlak plot method for each nodule were calculated from the perfusion CT data. All nodules were characterized as malignant or benign based on histopathology or 2 year follow up CT. All parameters were statistically compared between the two groups using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Twelve malignant and 9 benign lung nodules were analysed (median size 20.1 mm, 9–29 mm) in 21 patients (male/female = 11/9; mean age ± SD: 65.3 ± 7.4; age range: 50–76 years). The average SUV(max) values ± SD of the benign and malignant nodules were 2.2 ± 1.7 vs. 7.0 ± 4.5, respectively (p = 0.0148). Average K(i) values in benign and malignant nodules were 0.0057 ± 0.0071 and 0.0230 ± 0.0155 min(-1), respectively (p = 0.0311). Average BV for the benign and malignant nodules were 11.6857 ± 6.7347 and 28.3400 ± 15.9672 ml/100 ml, respectively (p = 0.0250). Average AF for the benign and malignant nodules were 74.4571 ± 89.0321 and 89.200 ± 49.8883 ml/100g/min, respectively (p = 0.1613). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic (18)F-FDG PET/CT and perfusion CT derived blood volume had similar capability to differentiate benign from malignant lung nodules. Sciendo 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8366734/ /pubmed/34051709 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2021-0024 Text en © 2021 Aleksander Marin, John T. Murchison, Kristopher M. Skwarski, Adriana A.S. Tavares, Alison Fletcher, William A. Wallace, Vladka Salapura, Edwin J.R. van Beek, Saeed Mirsadraee, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marin, Aleksander
Murchison, John T.
Skwarski, Kristopher M.
Tavares, Adriana A.S.
Fletcher, Alison
Wallace, William A.
Salapura, Vladka
van Beek, Edwin J.R.
Mirsadraee, Saeed
Can Dynamic Imaging, Using (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CT Perfusion Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Nodules?
title Can Dynamic Imaging, Using (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CT Perfusion Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Nodules?
title_full Can Dynamic Imaging, Using (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CT Perfusion Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Nodules?
title_fullStr Can Dynamic Imaging, Using (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CT Perfusion Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Nodules?
title_full_unstemmed Can Dynamic Imaging, Using (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CT Perfusion Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Nodules?
title_short Can Dynamic Imaging, Using (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CT Perfusion Differentiate Between Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Nodules?
title_sort can dynamic imaging, using (18)f-fdg pet/ct and ct perfusion differentiate between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34051709
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2021-0024
work_keys_str_mv AT marinaleksander candynamicimagingusing18ffdgpetctandctperfusiondifferentiatebetweenbenignandmalignantpulmonarynodules
AT murchisonjohnt candynamicimagingusing18ffdgpetctandctperfusiondifferentiatebetweenbenignandmalignantpulmonarynodules
AT skwarskikristopherm candynamicimagingusing18ffdgpetctandctperfusiondifferentiatebetweenbenignandmalignantpulmonarynodules
AT tavaresadrianaas candynamicimagingusing18ffdgpetctandctperfusiondifferentiatebetweenbenignandmalignantpulmonarynodules
AT fletcheralison candynamicimagingusing18ffdgpetctandctperfusiondifferentiatebetweenbenignandmalignantpulmonarynodules
AT wallacewilliama candynamicimagingusing18ffdgpetctandctperfusiondifferentiatebetweenbenignandmalignantpulmonarynodules
AT salapuravladka candynamicimagingusing18ffdgpetctandctperfusiondifferentiatebetweenbenignandmalignantpulmonarynodules
AT vanbeekedwinjr candynamicimagingusing18ffdgpetctandctperfusiondifferentiatebetweenbenignandmalignantpulmonarynodules
AT mirsadraeesaeed candynamicimagingusing18ffdgpetctandctperfusiondifferentiatebetweenbenignandmalignantpulmonarynodules