Cargando…

Continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review in out-of-hours general practice: a qualitative interview study of the benefits and limitations

BACKGROUND: Systems to detect and minimise unwarranted variation in clinician practice are crucial to ensure increasingly multidisciplinary healthcare workforces are supported to practise to their full potential. Such systems are limited in English general practice settings, with implications for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bennett-Britton, Ian, Banks, Jonathan, Carson-Stevens, Andrew, Salisbury, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33979302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0076
_version_ 1783738950326681600
author Bennett-Britton, Ian
Banks, Jonathan
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Salisbury, Chris
author_facet Bennett-Britton, Ian
Banks, Jonathan
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Salisbury, Chris
author_sort Bennett-Britton, Ian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systems to detect and minimise unwarranted variation in clinician practice are crucial to ensure increasingly multidisciplinary healthcare workforces are supported to practise to their full potential. Such systems are limited in English general practice settings, with implications for the efficiency and safety of care. AIM: To evaluate the benefits and limitations of a continuous, risk-based, consultation peer-review system used for 10 years by an out-of-hours general practice service in Bristol, UK. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative study in South West England. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews with intervention users (clinicians, peer reviewers, and clinical management), analysed by inductive thematic analysis and integrated into a programme theory. RESULTS: Twenty clinicians were interviewed between September 2018 and January 2019. Interviewees indicated that the intervention supported clinician learning through improved peer feedback, highlighting learning needs and validating practice. It was compared favourably with existing structures of ensuring clinician competence, supporting standardisation of supervision, clinical governance, and learning culture. These benefits were potentially limited by intervention factors such as differential feedback quality between clinician groups, the efficiency of methods to identify learning needs, and limitations of assessments based on written clinical notes. Contextual factors such as clinician experience, motivation, and organisational learning culture influenced the perception of the intervention as a support or a stressor. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate the potential of continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review to support clinicians in an increasingly multidisciplinary general practice workforce to efficiently and safely practise to their full potential. The programme theory provides a theoretical basis to maximise the benefits and accommodate the potential limitations of this methodology
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8366781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83667812021-08-27 Continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review in out-of-hours general practice: a qualitative interview study of the benefits and limitations Bennett-Britton, Ian Banks, Jonathan Carson-Stevens, Andrew Salisbury, Chris Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Systems to detect and minimise unwarranted variation in clinician practice are crucial to ensure increasingly multidisciplinary healthcare workforces are supported to practise to their full potential. Such systems are limited in English general practice settings, with implications for the efficiency and safety of care. AIM: To evaluate the benefits and limitations of a continuous, risk-based, consultation peer-review system used for 10 years by an out-of-hours general practice service in Bristol, UK. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative study in South West England. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews with intervention users (clinicians, peer reviewers, and clinical management), analysed by inductive thematic analysis and integrated into a programme theory. RESULTS: Twenty clinicians were interviewed between September 2018 and January 2019. Interviewees indicated that the intervention supported clinician learning through improved peer feedback, highlighting learning needs and validating practice. It was compared favourably with existing structures of ensuring clinician competence, supporting standardisation of supervision, clinical governance, and learning culture. These benefits were potentially limited by intervention factors such as differential feedback quality between clinician groups, the efficiency of methods to identify learning needs, and limitations of assessments based on written clinical notes. Contextual factors such as clinician experience, motivation, and organisational learning culture influenced the perception of the intervention as a support or a stressor. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate the potential of continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review to support clinicians in an increasingly multidisciplinary general practice workforce to efficiently and safely practise to their full potential. The programme theory provides a theoretical basis to maximise the benefits and accommodate the potential limitations of this methodology Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8366781/ /pubmed/33979302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0076 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
Bennett-Britton, Ian
Banks, Jonathan
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Salisbury, Chris
Continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review in out-of-hours general practice: a qualitative interview study of the benefits and limitations
title Continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review in out-of-hours general practice: a qualitative interview study of the benefits and limitations
title_full Continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review in out-of-hours general practice: a qualitative interview study of the benefits and limitations
title_fullStr Continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review in out-of-hours general practice: a qualitative interview study of the benefits and limitations
title_full_unstemmed Continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review in out-of-hours general practice: a qualitative interview study of the benefits and limitations
title_short Continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review in out-of-hours general practice: a qualitative interview study of the benefits and limitations
title_sort continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review in out-of-hours general practice: a qualitative interview study of the benefits and limitations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33979302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0076
work_keys_str_mv AT bennettbrittonian continuousriskbasedconsultationpeerreviewinoutofhoursgeneralpracticeaqualitativeinterviewstudyofthebenefitsandlimitations
AT banksjonathan continuousriskbasedconsultationpeerreviewinoutofhoursgeneralpracticeaqualitativeinterviewstudyofthebenefitsandlimitations
AT carsonstevensandrew continuousriskbasedconsultationpeerreviewinoutofhoursgeneralpracticeaqualitativeinterviewstudyofthebenefitsandlimitations
AT salisburychris continuousriskbasedconsultationpeerreviewinoutofhoursgeneralpracticeaqualitativeinterviewstudyofthebenefitsandlimitations