Cargando…

Medico-legal Closed Case Trends in Canadian Plastic Surgery: A Retrospective Descriptive Study

To enhance patient safety and prevent medico-legal complaints, we need to understand current trends and impacts. We aimed to characterize Canadian plastic surgery medico-legal patterns in many dimensions. METHOD: This retrospective descriptive analysis of Canadian Medical Protective Association data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zach, Calder, Lisa, Finestone, P.J., Liu, Richard, Bucevska, Marija, Arneja, Jugpal S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34414060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003754
_version_ 1783738999808983040
author Zhang, Zach
Calder, Lisa
Finestone, P.J.
Liu, Richard
Bucevska, Marija
Arneja, Jugpal S.
author_facet Zhang, Zach
Calder, Lisa
Finestone, P.J.
Liu, Richard
Bucevska, Marija
Arneja, Jugpal S.
author_sort Zhang, Zach
collection PubMed
description To enhance patient safety and prevent medico-legal complaints, we need to understand current trends and impacts. We aimed to characterize Canadian plastic surgery medico-legal patterns in many dimensions. METHOD: This retrospective descriptive analysis of Canadian Medical Protective Association data between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017 included closed regulatory body complaints and civil-legal actions involving plastic surgeons. We excluded class action legal cases and hospital complaints. We collected data on patient allegations, procedure types, healthcare-related patient harms, and peer expert criticisms. The primary outcome of interest was physician medico-legal outcome. RESULTS: We found 414 cases that met the inclusion criteria: 253 (61.1%) cases involved cosmetic procedures and 161 (38.9%) noncosmetic procedures. The annual incidence among plastic surgeon members of regulatory body complaints and civil-legal actions was 12.1% and 6.7%, for a combined incidence of 18.8%. The most common allegations were deficient clinical assessment, inadequate informed consent, delayed or misdiagnosis, and inadequate monitoring. Leading contributing factors were physician–patient communication breakdown, deficient clinical judgments, and inadequate documentation. The top procedural complications included cosmetic deformity, poor scarring, upper extremity stiffness or deficit, major structural injury, and mental health disorder. Less than half of cases (198/414, 47.8%) had unfavorable medico-legal outcomes for the surgeon. Patients were compensated in 86/198 (43.4%) of civil-legal cases. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgeons experience more medico-legal complaints for cosmetic versus noncosmetic procedures. To minimize medico-legal risks, plastic surgeons should focus on strong physician–patient communication, patient education/consent, thorough clinical assessment, minimizing potentially preventable complications, and maintaining relevant documentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8367055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83670552021-08-18 Medico-legal Closed Case Trends in Canadian Plastic Surgery: A Retrospective Descriptive Study Zhang, Zach Calder, Lisa Finestone, P.J. Liu, Richard Bucevska, Marija Arneja, Jugpal S. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Business To enhance patient safety and prevent medico-legal complaints, we need to understand current trends and impacts. We aimed to characterize Canadian plastic surgery medico-legal patterns in many dimensions. METHOD: This retrospective descriptive analysis of Canadian Medical Protective Association data between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017 included closed regulatory body complaints and civil-legal actions involving plastic surgeons. We excluded class action legal cases and hospital complaints. We collected data on patient allegations, procedure types, healthcare-related patient harms, and peer expert criticisms. The primary outcome of interest was physician medico-legal outcome. RESULTS: We found 414 cases that met the inclusion criteria: 253 (61.1%) cases involved cosmetic procedures and 161 (38.9%) noncosmetic procedures. The annual incidence among plastic surgeon members of regulatory body complaints and civil-legal actions was 12.1% and 6.7%, for a combined incidence of 18.8%. The most common allegations were deficient clinical assessment, inadequate informed consent, delayed or misdiagnosis, and inadequate monitoring. Leading contributing factors were physician–patient communication breakdown, deficient clinical judgments, and inadequate documentation. The top procedural complications included cosmetic deformity, poor scarring, upper extremity stiffness or deficit, major structural injury, and mental health disorder. Less than half of cases (198/414, 47.8%) had unfavorable medico-legal outcomes for the surgeon. Patients were compensated in 86/198 (43.4%) of civil-legal cases. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgeons experience more medico-legal complaints for cosmetic versus noncosmetic procedures. To minimize medico-legal risks, plastic surgeons should focus on strong physician–patient communication, patient education/consent, thorough clinical assessment, minimizing potentially preventable complications, and maintaining relevant documentation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8367055/ /pubmed/34414060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003754 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Business
Zhang, Zach
Calder, Lisa
Finestone, P.J.
Liu, Richard
Bucevska, Marija
Arneja, Jugpal S.
Medico-legal Closed Case Trends in Canadian Plastic Surgery: A Retrospective Descriptive Study
title Medico-legal Closed Case Trends in Canadian Plastic Surgery: A Retrospective Descriptive Study
title_full Medico-legal Closed Case Trends in Canadian Plastic Surgery: A Retrospective Descriptive Study
title_fullStr Medico-legal Closed Case Trends in Canadian Plastic Surgery: A Retrospective Descriptive Study
title_full_unstemmed Medico-legal Closed Case Trends in Canadian Plastic Surgery: A Retrospective Descriptive Study
title_short Medico-legal Closed Case Trends in Canadian Plastic Surgery: A Retrospective Descriptive Study
title_sort medico-legal closed case trends in canadian plastic surgery: a retrospective descriptive study
topic Business
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34414060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003754
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzach medicolegalclosedcasetrendsincanadianplasticsurgeryaretrospectivedescriptivestudy
AT calderlisa medicolegalclosedcasetrendsincanadianplasticsurgeryaretrospectivedescriptivestudy
AT finestonepj medicolegalclosedcasetrendsincanadianplasticsurgeryaretrospectivedescriptivestudy
AT liurichard medicolegalclosedcasetrendsincanadianplasticsurgeryaretrospectivedescriptivestudy
AT bucevskamarija medicolegalclosedcasetrendsincanadianplasticsurgeryaretrospectivedescriptivestudy
AT arnejajugpals medicolegalclosedcasetrendsincanadianplasticsurgeryaretrospectivedescriptivestudy