Cargando…
Social Media and mHealth Technology for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Cancer is a leading cause of death, and although screening can reduce cancer morbidity and mortality, participation in screening remains suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of social media and mobile health (mHealth) interven...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34328423 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26759 |
_version_ | 1783739023500509184 |
---|---|
author | Ruco, Arlinda Dossa, Fahima Tinmouth, Jill Llovet, Diego Jacobson, Jenna Kishibe, Teruko Baxter, Nancy |
author_facet | Ruco, Arlinda Dossa, Fahima Tinmouth, Jill Llovet, Diego Jacobson, Jenna Kishibe, Teruko Baxter, Nancy |
author_sort | Ruco, Arlinda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cancer is a leading cause of death, and although screening can reduce cancer morbidity and mortality, participation in screening remains suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of social media and mobile health (mHealth) interventions for cancer screening. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies of social media and mHealth interventions promoting cancer screening (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers) in adults in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Communication & Mass Media Complete from January 1, 2000, to July 17, 2020. Two independent reviewers screened the titles, abstracts, and full-text articles and completed the risk of bias assessments. We pooled odds ratios for screening participation using the Mantel-Haenszel method in a random-effects model. RESULTS: We screened 18,008 records identifying 39 studies (35 mHealth and 4 social media). The types of interventions included peer support (n=1), education or awareness (n=6), reminders (n=13), or mixed (n=19). The overall pooled odds ratio was 1.49 (95% CI 1.31-1.70), with similar effect sizes across cancer types. CONCLUSIONS: Screening programs should consider mHealth interventions because of their promising role in promoting cancer screening participation. Given the limited number of studies identified, further research is needed for social media interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42019139615; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=139615 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035411 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8367160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83671602021-08-24 Social Media and mHealth Technology for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ruco, Arlinda Dossa, Fahima Tinmouth, Jill Llovet, Diego Jacobson, Jenna Kishibe, Teruko Baxter, Nancy J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Cancer is a leading cause of death, and although screening can reduce cancer morbidity and mortality, participation in screening remains suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of social media and mobile health (mHealth) interventions for cancer screening. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies of social media and mHealth interventions promoting cancer screening (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers) in adults in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Communication & Mass Media Complete from January 1, 2000, to July 17, 2020. Two independent reviewers screened the titles, abstracts, and full-text articles and completed the risk of bias assessments. We pooled odds ratios for screening participation using the Mantel-Haenszel method in a random-effects model. RESULTS: We screened 18,008 records identifying 39 studies (35 mHealth and 4 social media). The types of interventions included peer support (n=1), education or awareness (n=6), reminders (n=13), or mixed (n=19). The overall pooled odds ratio was 1.49 (95% CI 1.31-1.70), with similar effect sizes across cancer types. CONCLUSIONS: Screening programs should consider mHealth interventions because of their promising role in promoting cancer screening participation. Given the limited number of studies identified, further research is needed for social media interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42019139615; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=139615 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035411 JMIR Publications 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8367160/ /pubmed/34328423 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26759 Text en ©Arlinda Ruco, Fahima Dossa, Jill Tinmouth, Diego Llovet, Jenna Jacobson, Teruko Kishibe, Nancy Baxter. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 30.07.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Ruco, Arlinda Dossa, Fahima Tinmouth, Jill Llovet, Diego Jacobson, Jenna Kishibe, Teruko Baxter, Nancy Social Media and mHealth Technology for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Social Media and mHealth Technology for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Social Media and mHealth Technology for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Social Media and mHealth Technology for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Social Media and mHealth Technology for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Social Media and mHealth Technology for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | social media and mhealth technology for cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34328423 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26759 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rucoarlinda socialmediaandmhealthtechnologyforcancerscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dossafahima socialmediaandmhealthtechnologyforcancerscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tinmouthjill socialmediaandmhealthtechnologyforcancerscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT llovetdiego socialmediaandmhealthtechnologyforcancerscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jacobsonjenna socialmediaandmhealthtechnologyforcancerscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kishibeteruko socialmediaandmhealthtechnologyforcancerscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baxternancy socialmediaandmhealthtechnologyforcancerscreeningsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |