Cargando…

Evaluating Digital Program Support for the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) School Program: Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND: Effectively scaled-up physical activity interventions are urgently needed to address the high prevalence of physical inactivity. To facilitate scale-up of an efficacious school-based physical activity program (Physical Activity 4 Everyone [PA4E1]), provision of implementation support to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mclaughlin, Matthew, Duff, Jed, McKenzie, Tom, Campbell, Elizabeth, Sutherland, Rachel, Wiggers, John, Wolfenden, Luke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34309565
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26690
_version_ 1783739027046793216
author Mclaughlin, Matthew
Duff, Jed
McKenzie, Tom
Campbell, Elizabeth
Sutherland, Rachel
Wiggers, John
Wolfenden, Luke
author_facet Mclaughlin, Matthew
Duff, Jed
McKenzie, Tom
Campbell, Elizabeth
Sutherland, Rachel
Wiggers, John
Wolfenden, Luke
author_sort Mclaughlin, Matthew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effectively scaled-up physical activity interventions are urgently needed to address the high prevalence of physical inactivity. To facilitate scale-up of an efficacious school-based physical activity program (Physical Activity 4 Everyone [PA4E1]), provision of implementation support to physical education (PE) teachers was adapted from face-to-face and paper-based delivery modes to partial delivery via a website. A lack of engagement (usage and subjective experience) with digital delivery modes, including websites, may in part explain the typical reduction in effectiveness of scaled-up interventions that use digital delivery modes. A process evaluation focused on the PA4E1 website was undertaken. OBJECTIVE: The 2 objectives were to (1) describe the usage of the PA4E1 program website by in-school champions (PE teachers leading the program within their schools) and PE teachers using quantitative methods; (2) examine the usage, subjective experience, and usability of the PA4E1 program website from the perspective of in-school champions using mixed methods. METHODS: The first objective used website usage data collected across all users (n=273) throughout the 9 school terms of the PA4E1 implementation support. The 4 usage measures were sessions, page views, average session duration, and downloads. Descriptive statistics were calculated and explored across the duration of the 26-month program. The second objective used mixed methods, triangulating data from the first objective with data from a think-aloud survey and usability test completed by in-school champions (n=13) at 12 months. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically alongside descriptive statistics from the quantitative data in a triangulation matrix, generating cross-cutting themes using the “following a thread” approach. RESULTS: For the first objective, in-school champions averaged 48.0 sessions per user, PE teachers 5.8 sessions. PE teacher sessions were of longer duration (10.5 vs 7.6 minutes) and included more page views (5.4 vs 3.4). The results from the mixed methods analysis for the second objective found 9 themes and 2 meta-themes. The first meta-theme indicated that the website was an acceptable and appropriate delivery mode, and usability of the website was high. The second meta-theme found that the website content was acceptable and appropriate, and identified specific suggestions for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Digital health interventions targeting physical activity often experience issues of lack of user engagement. By contrast, the findings from both the quantitative and mixed methods analyses indicate high usage and overall acceptability and appropriateness of the PA4E1 website to school teachers. The findings support the value of the website within a multidelivery mode implementation intervention to support schools to implement physical activity promoting practices. The analysis identified suggested intervention refinements, which may be adopted for future iterations and further scale-up of the PA4E1 program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000681358; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372870
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8367175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83671752021-08-24 Evaluating Digital Program Support for the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) School Program: Mixed Methods Study Mclaughlin, Matthew Duff, Jed McKenzie, Tom Campbell, Elizabeth Sutherland, Rachel Wiggers, John Wolfenden, Luke JMIR Pediatr Parent Original Paper BACKGROUND: Effectively scaled-up physical activity interventions are urgently needed to address the high prevalence of physical inactivity. To facilitate scale-up of an efficacious school-based physical activity program (Physical Activity 4 Everyone [PA4E1]), provision of implementation support to physical education (PE) teachers was adapted from face-to-face and paper-based delivery modes to partial delivery via a website. A lack of engagement (usage and subjective experience) with digital delivery modes, including websites, may in part explain the typical reduction in effectiveness of scaled-up interventions that use digital delivery modes. A process evaluation focused on the PA4E1 website was undertaken. OBJECTIVE: The 2 objectives were to (1) describe the usage of the PA4E1 program website by in-school champions (PE teachers leading the program within their schools) and PE teachers using quantitative methods; (2) examine the usage, subjective experience, and usability of the PA4E1 program website from the perspective of in-school champions using mixed methods. METHODS: The first objective used website usage data collected across all users (n=273) throughout the 9 school terms of the PA4E1 implementation support. The 4 usage measures were sessions, page views, average session duration, and downloads. Descriptive statistics were calculated and explored across the duration of the 26-month program. The second objective used mixed methods, triangulating data from the first objective with data from a think-aloud survey and usability test completed by in-school champions (n=13) at 12 months. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically alongside descriptive statistics from the quantitative data in a triangulation matrix, generating cross-cutting themes using the “following a thread” approach. RESULTS: For the first objective, in-school champions averaged 48.0 sessions per user, PE teachers 5.8 sessions. PE teacher sessions were of longer duration (10.5 vs 7.6 minutes) and included more page views (5.4 vs 3.4). The results from the mixed methods analysis for the second objective found 9 themes and 2 meta-themes. The first meta-theme indicated that the website was an acceptable and appropriate delivery mode, and usability of the website was high. The second meta-theme found that the website content was acceptable and appropriate, and identified specific suggestions for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Digital health interventions targeting physical activity often experience issues of lack of user engagement. By contrast, the findings from both the quantitative and mixed methods analyses indicate high usage and overall acceptability and appropriateness of the PA4E1 website to school teachers. The findings support the value of the website within a multidelivery mode implementation intervention to support schools to implement physical activity promoting practices. The analysis identified suggested intervention refinements, which may be adopted for future iterations and further scale-up of the PA4E1 program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000681358; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372870 JMIR Publications 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8367175/ /pubmed/34309565 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26690 Text en ©Matthew Mclaughlin, Jed Duff, Tom McKenzie, Elizabeth Campbell, Rachel Sutherland, John Wiggers, Luke Wolfenden. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (https://pediatrics.jmir.org), 26.07.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://pediatrics.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Mclaughlin, Matthew
Duff, Jed
McKenzie, Tom
Campbell, Elizabeth
Sutherland, Rachel
Wiggers, John
Wolfenden, Luke
Evaluating Digital Program Support for the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) School Program: Mixed Methods Study
title Evaluating Digital Program Support for the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) School Program: Mixed Methods Study
title_full Evaluating Digital Program Support for the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) School Program: Mixed Methods Study
title_fullStr Evaluating Digital Program Support for the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) School Program: Mixed Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Digital Program Support for the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) School Program: Mixed Methods Study
title_short Evaluating Digital Program Support for the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) School Program: Mixed Methods Study
title_sort evaluating digital program support for the physical activity 4 everyone (pa4e1) school program: mixed methods study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34309565
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26690
work_keys_str_mv AT mclaughlinmatthew evaluatingdigitalprogramsupportforthephysicalactivity4everyonepa4e1schoolprogrammixedmethodsstudy
AT duffjed evaluatingdigitalprogramsupportforthephysicalactivity4everyonepa4e1schoolprogrammixedmethodsstudy
AT mckenzietom evaluatingdigitalprogramsupportforthephysicalactivity4everyonepa4e1schoolprogrammixedmethodsstudy
AT campbellelizabeth evaluatingdigitalprogramsupportforthephysicalactivity4everyonepa4e1schoolprogrammixedmethodsstudy
AT sutherlandrachel evaluatingdigitalprogramsupportforthephysicalactivity4everyonepa4e1schoolprogrammixedmethodsstudy
AT wiggersjohn evaluatingdigitalprogramsupportforthephysicalactivity4everyonepa4e1schoolprogrammixedmethodsstudy
AT wolfendenluke evaluatingdigitalprogramsupportforthephysicalactivity4everyonepa4e1schoolprogrammixedmethodsstudy