Cargando…
The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature
BACKGROUND: Medical journals use Twitter to engage and disseminate their research articles and implement a range of strategies to maximize reach and impact. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically review the literature to synthesize and describe the different Twitter strategies used by medical...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34319238 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26378 |
_version_ | 1783739029156528128 |
---|---|
author | Erskine, Natalie Hendricks, Sharief |
author_facet | Erskine, Natalie Hendricks, Sharief |
author_sort | Erskine, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medical journals use Twitter to engage and disseminate their research articles and implement a range of strategies to maximize reach and impact. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically review the literature to synthesize and describe the different Twitter strategies used by medical journals and their effectiveness on journal impact and readership metrics. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature before February 2020 in four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) was conducted. Articles were reviewed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. RESULTS: The search identified 44 original research studies that evaluated Twitter strategies implemented by medical journals and analyzed the relationship between Twitter metrics and alternative and citation-based metrics. The key findings suggest that promoting publications on Twitter improves citation-based and alternative metrics for academic medical journals. Moreover, implementing different Twitter strategies maximizes the amount of attention that publications and journals receive. The four key Twitter strategies implemented by many medical journals are tweeting the title and link of the article, infographics, podcasts, and hosting monthly internet-based journal clubs. Each strategy was successful in promoting the publications. However, different metrics were used to measure success. CONCLUSIONS: Four key Twitter strategies are implemented by medical journals: tweeting the title and link of the article, infographics, podcasts, and hosting monthly internet-based journal clubs. In this review, each strategy was successful in promoting publications but used different metrics to measure success. Thus, it is difficult to conclude which strategy is most effective. In addition, the four strategies have different costs and effects on dissemination and readership. We recommend that journals and researchers incorporate a combination of Twitter strategies to maximize research impact and capture audiences with a variety of learning methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8367184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83671842021-08-24 The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature Erskine, Natalie Hendricks, Sharief J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Medical journals use Twitter to engage and disseminate their research articles and implement a range of strategies to maximize reach and impact. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically review the literature to synthesize and describe the different Twitter strategies used by medical journals and their effectiveness on journal impact and readership metrics. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature before February 2020 in four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) was conducted. Articles were reviewed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. RESULTS: The search identified 44 original research studies that evaluated Twitter strategies implemented by medical journals and analyzed the relationship between Twitter metrics and alternative and citation-based metrics. The key findings suggest that promoting publications on Twitter improves citation-based and alternative metrics for academic medical journals. Moreover, implementing different Twitter strategies maximizes the amount of attention that publications and journals receive. The four key Twitter strategies implemented by many medical journals are tweeting the title and link of the article, infographics, podcasts, and hosting monthly internet-based journal clubs. Each strategy was successful in promoting the publications. However, different metrics were used to measure success. CONCLUSIONS: Four key Twitter strategies are implemented by medical journals: tweeting the title and link of the article, infographics, podcasts, and hosting monthly internet-based journal clubs. In this review, each strategy was successful in promoting publications but used different metrics to measure success. Thus, it is difficult to conclude which strategy is most effective. In addition, the four strategies have different costs and effects on dissemination and readership. We recommend that journals and researchers incorporate a combination of Twitter strategies to maximize research impact and capture audiences with a variety of learning methods. JMIR Publications 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8367184/ /pubmed/34319238 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26378 Text en ©Natalie Erskine, Sharief Hendricks. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 28.07.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Erskine, Natalie Hendricks, Sharief The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature |
title | The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_full | The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_short | The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_sort | use of twitter by medical journals: systematic review of the literature |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34319238 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erskinenatalie theuseoftwitterbymedicaljournalssystematicreviewoftheliterature AT hendrickssharief theuseoftwitterbymedicaljournalssystematicreviewoftheliterature AT erskinenatalie useoftwitterbymedicaljournalssystematicreviewoftheliterature AT hendrickssharief useoftwitterbymedicaljournalssystematicreviewoftheliterature |