Cargando…
Single-flap versus double-flap approach for periodontal pocket reduction in supraosseous defects: a comparative study
PURPOSE: The single-flap approach (SFA) is a minimally invasive technique with limited mucoperiosteal flap elevation to gain access to the buccal/palatal aspects, thus limiting post-surgical complications. The purpose of the present study was to gain insights into the impact of the SFA over the doub...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Periodontology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34387044 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2004200210 |
_version_ | 1783739070880415744 |
---|---|
author | Mathala, Venkata Lakshmi Konathala, Santosh Venkata Ramesh Gottumukkala, Naga Venkata Satya Sruthima Pasupuleti, Mohan Kumar Bypalli, Vivek Korukonda, Radharani |
author_facet | Mathala, Venkata Lakshmi Konathala, Santosh Venkata Ramesh Gottumukkala, Naga Venkata Satya Sruthima Pasupuleti, Mohan Kumar Bypalli, Vivek Korukonda, Radharani |
author_sort | Mathala, Venkata Lakshmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The single-flap approach (SFA) is a minimally invasive technique with limited mucoperiosteal flap elevation to gain access to the buccal/palatal aspects, thus limiting post-surgical complications. The purpose of the present study was to gain insights into the impact of the SFA over the double-flap approach (DFA) on periodontal flap treatment outcomes and patient compliance in terms of discomfort and time taken for surgical procedures. METHODS: Twenty patients with persistent probing pocket depths of ≥5 mm were scheduled for the SFA (test site) and for the DFA (control site). All the clinical periodontal parameters were recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Radiographic bone level (cone-beam computed tomography) was evaluated at baseline and 6 months. Patients' postoperative pain perception and wound healing were also assessed. RESULTS: The SFA showed a significant reduction in periodontal pocket depth, gain in clinical attachment level (CAL), and gain in bone level when compared with the DFA. The SFA substantially improved wound healing and induced less postoperative pain than the DFA. CONCLUSIONS: The SFA resulted in substantial improvement in the composite outcome measures, as shown by a reduction in pocket depth with minimal gingival recession, gain in CAL, early wound healing, less postoperative discomfort, and better patient-centered outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry-India Identifier: CTRI/2018/05/013562 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8367645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Periodontology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83676452021-08-25 Single-flap versus double-flap approach for periodontal pocket reduction in supraosseous defects: a comparative study Mathala, Venkata Lakshmi Konathala, Santosh Venkata Ramesh Gottumukkala, Naga Venkata Satya Sruthima Pasupuleti, Mohan Kumar Bypalli, Vivek Korukonda, Radharani J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: The single-flap approach (SFA) is a minimally invasive technique with limited mucoperiosteal flap elevation to gain access to the buccal/palatal aspects, thus limiting post-surgical complications. The purpose of the present study was to gain insights into the impact of the SFA over the double-flap approach (DFA) on periodontal flap treatment outcomes and patient compliance in terms of discomfort and time taken for surgical procedures. METHODS: Twenty patients with persistent probing pocket depths of ≥5 mm were scheduled for the SFA (test site) and for the DFA (control site). All the clinical periodontal parameters were recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Radiographic bone level (cone-beam computed tomography) was evaluated at baseline and 6 months. Patients' postoperative pain perception and wound healing were also assessed. RESULTS: The SFA showed a significant reduction in periodontal pocket depth, gain in clinical attachment level (CAL), and gain in bone level when compared with the DFA. The SFA substantially improved wound healing and induced less postoperative pain than the DFA. CONCLUSIONS: The SFA resulted in substantial improvement in the composite outcome measures, as shown by a reduction in pocket depth with minimal gingival recession, gain in CAL, early wound healing, less postoperative discomfort, and better patient-centered outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry-India Identifier: CTRI/2018/05/013562 Korean Academy of Periodontology 2021-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8367645/ /pubmed/34387044 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2004200210 Text en Copyright © 2021. Korean Academy of Periodontology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mathala, Venkata Lakshmi Konathala, Santosh Venkata Ramesh Gottumukkala, Naga Venkata Satya Sruthima Pasupuleti, Mohan Kumar Bypalli, Vivek Korukonda, Radharani Single-flap versus double-flap approach for periodontal pocket reduction in supraosseous defects: a comparative study |
title | Single-flap versus double-flap approach for periodontal pocket reduction in supraosseous defects: a comparative study |
title_full | Single-flap versus double-flap approach for periodontal pocket reduction in supraosseous defects: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | Single-flap versus double-flap approach for periodontal pocket reduction in supraosseous defects: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-flap versus double-flap approach for periodontal pocket reduction in supraosseous defects: a comparative study |
title_short | Single-flap versus double-flap approach for periodontal pocket reduction in supraosseous defects: a comparative study |
title_sort | single-flap versus double-flap approach for periodontal pocket reduction in supraosseous defects: a comparative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34387044 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2004200210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathalavenkatalakshmi singleflapversusdoubleflapapproachforperiodontalpocketreductioninsupraosseousdefectsacomparativestudy AT konathalasantoshvenkataramesh singleflapversusdoubleflapapproachforperiodontalpocketreductioninsupraosseousdefectsacomparativestudy AT gottumukkalanagavenkatasatyasruthima singleflapversusdoubleflapapproachforperiodontalpocketreductioninsupraosseousdefectsacomparativestudy AT pasupuletimohankumar singleflapversusdoubleflapapproachforperiodontalpocketreductioninsupraosseousdefectsacomparativestudy AT bypallivivek singleflapversusdoubleflapapproachforperiodontalpocketreductioninsupraosseousdefectsacomparativestudy AT korukondaradharani singleflapversusdoubleflapapproachforperiodontalpocketreductioninsupraosseousdefectsacomparativestudy |