Cargando…
Variation in SARS-CoV-2 molecular test sensitivity by specimen types in a large sample of emergency department patients
BACKGROUND: Provider-collected nasopharyngeal specimens for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) molecular testing are the standard of care in many clinical settings, but patient-collected saliva and anterior nares specimens are less invasive and more flexible alternatives. P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34478943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.034 |
_version_ | 1783739073249148928 |
---|---|
author | Bruxvoort, Katia Tenggardjaja, Christopher F. Slezak, Jeff Gullett, Jonathan C. Broder, Benjamin Park, Claire H. Aragones, Michael Mercado, Cheryl Wong, Katherine McLaren, Steven Jacobsen, Steven J. |
author_facet | Bruxvoort, Katia Tenggardjaja, Christopher F. Slezak, Jeff Gullett, Jonathan C. Broder, Benjamin Park, Claire H. Aragones, Michael Mercado, Cheryl Wong, Katherine McLaren, Steven Jacobsen, Steven J. |
author_sort | Bruxvoort, Katia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Provider-collected nasopharyngeal specimens for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) molecular testing are the standard of care in many clinical settings, but patient-collected saliva and anterior nares specimens are less invasive and more flexible alternatives. Prior studies comparing specimen types for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing have been limited by small sample sizes and low pretest probability. We conducted a large observational study among symptomatic adults at 7 emergency departments of Kaiser Permanente Southern California to examine sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 molecular tests by specimen type and patient characteristics. METHODS: Provider-collected nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal (NP/OP) specimens and patient-collected saliva and anterior nares specimens were collected at the same visit and analyzed with the Roche cobas® SARS-CoV-2 assay. Patients were considered truly positive for SARS-CoV-2 if any of the three specimens was positive and negative if all three specimens were negative. Factors associated with discordant and missed positive results were examined with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 2112 patients, 350 (16.6%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Sensitivity of NP/OP was 93.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.6%–96.0%), sensitivity of saliva was 87.7% (83.8%–91.0%), and sensitivity of anterior nares was 85.4% (81.3%–89.0%). Patients ages 18–39 years versus ≥40 years were more likely to have discordant results [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.97 (1.12–3.45)], as were patients with <4 symptoms versus ≥4 [aOR 2.43 (1.39–4.25)]. Cycle threshold values were higher for saliva and anterior nares than NP/OP specimens, as well as for specimens in discordant versus concordant sets and patients with fewer symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study provides robust evidence that patient-collected saliva and anterior nares are sensitive for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing in emergency department settings, particularly among adults ages ≥40 years and those with multiple symptoms. Higher sensitivity of provider-collected NP/OP specimens must be weighed against the benefits of patient-collected specimens in tailored strategies for SARS-CoV-2 testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8367656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83676562021-08-17 Variation in SARS-CoV-2 molecular test sensitivity by specimen types in a large sample of emergency department patients Bruxvoort, Katia Tenggardjaja, Christopher F. Slezak, Jeff Gullett, Jonathan C. Broder, Benjamin Park, Claire H. Aragones, Michael Mercado, Cheryl Wong, Katherine McLaren, Steven Jacobsen, Steven J. Am J Emerg Med Article BACKGROUND: Provider-collected nasopharyngeal specimens for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) molecular testing are the standard of care in many clinical settings, but patient-collected saliva and anterior nares specimens are less invasive and more flexible alternatives. Prior studies comparing specimen types for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing have been limited by small sample sizes and low pretest probability. We conducted a large observational study among symptomatic adults at 7 emergency departments of Kaiser Permanente Southern California to examine sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 molecular tests by specimen type and patient characteristics. METHODS: Provider-collected nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal (NP/OP) specimens and patient-collected saliva and anterior nares specimens were collected at the same visit and analyzed with the Roche cobas® SARS-CoV-2 assay. Patients were considered truly positive for SARS-CoV-2 if any of the three specimens was positive and negative if all three specimens were negative. Factors associated with discordant and missed positive results were examined with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 2112 patients, 350 (16.6%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Sensitivity of NP/OP was 93.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.6%–96.0%), sensitivity of saliva was 87.7% (83.8%–91.0%), and sensitivity of anterior nares was 85.4% (81.3%–89.0%). Patients ages 18–39 years versus ≥40 years were more likely to have discordant results [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.97 (1.12–3.45)], as were patients with <4 symptoms versus ≥4 [aOR 2.43 (1.39–4.25)]. Cycle threshold values were higher for saliva and anterior nares than NP/OP specimens, as well as for specimens in discordant versus concordant sets and patients with fewer symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study provides robust evidence that patient-collected saliva and anterior nares are sensitive for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing in emergency department settings, particularly among adults ages ≥40 years and those with multiple symptoms. Higher sensitivity of provider-collected NP/OP specimens must be weighed against the benefits of patient-collected specimens in tailored strategies for SARS-CoV-2 testing. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-12 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8367656/ /pubmed/34478943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.034 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Bruxvoort, Katia Tenggardjaja, Christopher F. Slezak, Jeff Gullett, Jonathan C. Broder, Benjamin Park, Claire H. Aragones, Michael Mercado, Cheryl Wong, Katherine McLaren, Steven Jacobsen, Steven J. Variation in SARS-CoV-2 molecular test sensitivity by specimen types in a large sample of emergency department patients |
title | Variation in SARS-CoV-2 molecular test sensitivity by specimen types in a large sample of emergency department patients |
title_full | Variation in SARS-CoV-2 molecular test sensitivity by specimen types in a large sample of emergency department patients |
title_fullStr | Variation in SARS-CoV-2 molecular test sensitivity by specimen types in a large sample of emergency department patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in SARS-CoV-2 molecular test sensitivity by specimen types in a large sample of emergency department patients |
title_short | Variation in SARS-CoV-2 molecular test sensitivity by specimen types in a large sample of emergency department patients |
title_sort | variation in sars-cov-2 molecular test sensitivity by specimen types in a large sample of emergency department patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34478943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bruxvoortkatia variationinsarscov2moleculartestsensitivitybyspecimentypesinalargesampleofemergencydepartmentpatients AT tenggardjajachristopherf variationinsarscov2moleculartestsensitivitybyspecimentypesinalargesampleofemergencydepartmentpatients AT slezakjeff variationinsarscov2moleculartestsensitivitybyspecimentypesinalargesampleofemergencydepartmentpatients AT gullettjonathanc variationinsarscov2moleculartestsensitivitybyspecimentypesinalargesampleofemergencydepartmentpatients AT broderbenjamin variationinsarscov2moleculartestsensitivitybyspecimentypesinalargesampleofemergencydepartmentpatients AT parkclaireh variationinsarscov2moleculartestsensitivitybyspecimentypesinalargesampleofemergencydepartmentpatients AT aragonesmichael variationinsarscov2moleculartestsensitivitybyspecimentypesinalargesampleofemergencydepartmentpatients AT mercadocheryl variationinsarscov2moleculartestsensitivitybyspecimentypesinalargesampleofemergencydepartmentpatients AT wongkatherine variationinsarscov2moleculartestsensitivitybyspecimentypesinalargesampleofemergencydepartmentpatients AT mclarensteven variationinsarscov2moleculartestsensitivitybyspecimentypesinalargesampleofemergencydepartmentpatients AT jacobsenstevenj variationinsarscov2moleculartestsensitivitybyspecimentypesinalargesampleofemergencydepartmentpatients |