Cargando…
HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: A systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021)
BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is recommended by the WHO as an innovative strategy to reach UNAIDS targets to end HIV by 2030. HIVST with digital supports is defined as the use of digital interventions (e.g., website-based, social media, mobile HIVST applications (apps), text messaging (SMS),...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101059 |
_version_ | 1783739086764244992 |
---|---|
author | McGuire, Madison de Waal, Anna Karellis, Angela Janssen, Ricky Engel, Nora Sampath, Rangarajan Carmona, Sergio Zwerling, Alice Anne Suarez, Marta Fernandez Pai, Nitika Pant |
author_facet | McGuire, Madison de Waal, Anna Karellis, Angela Janssen, Ricky Engel, Nora Sampath, Rangarajan Carmona, Sergio Zwerling, Alice Anne Suarez, Marta Fernandez Pai, Nitika Pant |
author_sort | McGuire, Madison |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is recommended by the WHO as an innovative strategy to reach UNAIDS targets to end HIV by 2030. HIVST with digital supports is defined as the use of digital interventions (e.g., website-based, social media, mobile HIVST applications (apps), text messaging (SMS), digital vending machines (digital VMs)) to improve the efficiency and impact of HIVST. HIVST deployment and integration in health services is an emerging priority. We conducted a systematic review aiming to close the gap in evidence that summarizes the impact of digitally supported HIVST and to inform policy recommendations. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for articles and abstracts on HIVST with digital supports published during the period February 1st, 2010 to June 15th, 2021, following Cochrane guidelines and PRISMA methodology. We assessed feasibility, acceptability, preference, and impact outcomes across all populations and study designs. Metrics reported were willingness to use HIVST, preferences for HIVST delivery, proportion of first-time testers, HIVST uptake, HIVST kit return rate, and linkage to care. Heterogeneity of the interventions and reported metrics precluded us from conducting a meta-analysis. FINDINGS: 46 studies were narratively synthesized, of which 72% were observational and 28% were RCTs. Half of all studies (54%, 25/46) assessed web-based innovations (e.g., study websites, videos, chatbots), followed by social media (26%, 12/46), HIVST-specific apps (7%, 3/46), SMS (9%, 4/46), and digital VMs (4%, 2/46). Web-based innovations were found to be acceptable (77–97%), preferred over in-person and hybrid options by more first-time testers (47–48%), highly feasible (93–95%), and were overall effective in supporting linkage to care (53–100%). Social media and app-based innovations also had high acceptability (87–95%) and linkage to care proportions (80–100%). SMS innovations increased kit return rates (54–94%) and HIVST uptake among hard-to-reach groups. Finally, digital VMs were highly acceptable (54–93%), and HIVST uptake was six times greater when using digital VMs compared to distribution by community workers. INTERPRETATION: HIVST with digital supports was deemed feasible, acceptable, preferable, and was shown to increase uptake, engage first-time testers and hard-to-reach populations, and successfully link participants to treatment. Findings pave the way for greater use of HIVST interventions with digital supports globally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8367787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83677872021-08-23 HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: A systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021) McGuire, Madison de Waal, Anna Karellis, Angela Janssen, Ricky Engel, Nora Sampath, Rangarajan Carmona, Sergio Zwerling, Alice Anne Suarez, Marta Fernandez Pai, Nitika Pant EClinicalMedicine Research Paper BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is recommended by the WHO as an innovative strategy to reach UNAIDS targets to end HIV by 2030. HIVST with digital supports is defined as the use of digital interventions (e.g., website-based, social media, mobile HIVST applications (apps), text messaging (SMS), digital vending machines (digital VMs)) to improve the efficiency and impact of HIVST. HIVST deployment and integration in health services is an emerging priority. We conducted a systematic review aiming to close the gap in evidence that summarizes the impact of digitally supported HIVST and to inform policy recommendations. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for articles and abstracts on HIVST with digital supports published during the period February 1st, 2010 to June 15th, 2021, following Cochrane guidelines and PRISMA methodology. We assessed feasibility, acceptability, preference, and impact outcomes across all populations and study designs. Metrics reported were willingness to use HIVST, preferences for HIVST delivery, proportion of first-time testers, HIVST uptake, HIVST kit return rate, and linkage to care. Heterogeneity of the interventions and reported metrics precluded us from conducting a meta-analysis. FINDINGS: 46 studies were narratively synthesized, of which 72% were observational and 28% were RCTs. Half of all studies (54%, 25/46) assessed web-based innovations (e.g., study websites, videos, chatbots), followed by social media (26%, 12/46), HIVST-specific apps (7%, 3/46), SMS (9%, 4/46), and digital VMs (4%, 2/46). Web-based innovations were found to be acceptable (77–97%), preferred over in-person and hybrid options by more first-time testers (47–48%), highly feasible (93–95%), and were overall effective in supporting linkage to care (53–100%). Social media and app-based innovations also had high acceptability (87–95%) and linkage to care proportions (80–100%). SMS innovations increased kit return rates (54–94%) and HIVST uptake among hard-to-reach groups. Finally, digital VMs were highly acceptable (54–93%), and HIVST uptake was six times greater when using digital VMs compared to distribution by community workers. INTERPRETATION: HIVST with digital supports was deemed feasible, acceptable, preferable, and was shown to increase uptake, engage first-time testers and hard-to-reach populations, and successfully link participants to treatment. Findings pave the way for greater use of HIVST interventions with digital supports globally. Elsevier 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8367787/ /pubmed/34430835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101059 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper McGuire, Madison de Waal, Anna Karellis, Angela Janssen, Ricky Engel, Nora Sampath, Rangarajan Carmona, Sergio Zwerling, Alice Anne Suarez, Marta Fernandez Pai, Nitika Pant HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: A systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021) |
title | HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: A systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021) |
title_full | HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: A systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021) |
title_fullStr | HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: A systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021) |
title_full_unstemmed | HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: A systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021) |
title_short | HIV self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: A systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021) |
title_sort | hiv self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: a systematic review of global evidence (2010–2021) |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcguiremadison hivselftestingwithdigitalsupportsasthenewparadigmasystematicreviewofglobalevidence20102021 AT dewaalanna hivselftestingwithdigitalsupportsasthenewparadigmasystematicreviewofglobalevidence20102021 AT karellisangela hivselftestingwithdigitalsupportsasthenewparadigmasystematicreviewofglobalevidence20102021 AT janssenricky hivselftestingwithdigitalsupportsasthenewparadigmasystematicreviewofglobalevidence20102021 AT engelnora hivselftestingwithdigitalsupportsasthenewparadigmasystematicreviewofglobalevidence20102021 AT sampathrangarajan hivselftestingwithdigitalsupportsasthenewparadigmasystematicreviewofglobalevidence20102021 AT carmonasergio hivselftestingwithdigitalsupportsasthenewparadigmasystematicreviewofglobalevidence20102021 AT zwerlingaliceanne hivselftestingwithdigitalsupportsasthenewparadigmasystematicreviewofglobalevidence20102021 AT suarezmartafernandez hivselftestingwithdigitalsupportsasthenewparadigmasystematicreviewofglobalevidence20102021 AT painitikapant hivselftestingwithdigitalsupportsasthenewparadigmasystematicreviewofglobalevidence20102021 |