Cargando…

Dayara bugyal restoration model in the alpine and subalpine region of the Central Himalaya: a step toward minimizing the impacts

Eco-restoration initiative work in the high altitude Dayara pastureland (3501 m) from the Indian Himalayan Region has been considered to be one of the successful field demonstration against both natural and anthropogenic degradation. The present study therefore attempts to assess the implications of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuniyal, Jagdish Chandra, Maiti, Priyanka, Kumar, Sandeep, Kumar, Anand, Bisht, Nisha, Sekar, K. Chandra, Arya, Satish Chandra, Rai, Sumit, Nand, Mahesha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95472-y
_version_ 1783739123363741696
author Kuniyal, Jagdish Chandra
Maiti, Priyanka
Kumar, Sandeep
Kumar, Anand
Bisht, Nisha
Sekar, K. Chandra
Arya, Satish Chandra
Rai, Sumit
Nand, Mahesha
author_facet Kuniyal, Jagdish Chandra
Maiti, Priyanka
Kumar, Sandeep
Kumar, Anand
Bisht, Nisha
Sekar, K. Chandra
Arya, Satish Chandra
Rai, Sumit
Nand, Mahesha
author_sort Kuniyal, Jagdish Chandra
collection PubMed
description Eco-restoration initiative work in the high altitude Dayara pastureland (3501 m) from the Indian Himalayan Region has been considered to be one of the successful field demonstration against both natural and anthropogenic degradation. The present study therefore attempts to assess the implications of entire eco-restoration model as practiced by Department of Forest, Government of Uttarakhand in 2019. Its assessment was done by calculating restoration success index by way of considering three categories, viz., direct management measure (M), environmental desirability (E) and socio-economic feasibility (SE) considering 22 individual variables. ‘M’ comprised both biotic and abiotic pressures. Grazing and tourism were biotic, while abiotic pressure was considered mainly soil erosion in alpine area due to topographic fragility. Above ground vegetation profile and below ground soil nutrient profile (N, P, K, pH and water holding capacity) were analyzed in ‘E’ component. In the last but not least, ‘SE’ was analyzed to assess the social acceptability of the local communities and stakeholders who are supposed to be ultimate beneficiary of alike interventions. Direct management measure was found with the variable index score of 0.8 indicating the higher score as compared to environmental desirability (0.56). Under direct management measure, grazing and tourists’ carrying capacity of the area was analyzed with high management needs to call the region sustainable in terms of availability of bio-resources. The ecosystem index score was evaluated for the reference (81.94), treated (64.5) and untreated zones (52.03), wherein increasing profile of these values were found. The outcomes like improved vegetation profile in terms of total herb density, soil nutrient profile of the restored area along with soil pH (4.96) and water holding capacity (49.85%) were found to be restored significantly along with controlling 169.64 tonne year(-1) soil erosion from draining. The assessment of grazing pattern of 118 migratory Cow Unit (CU) (76 horse/mule and 18 sheep/goat, already controlled), 318 local CU (30 horse/mule and 187 sheep/goat) were calculated and recommended to be controlled. Tourists’ carrying capacity of 274 tourists per day and manual removal of Rumex nepalensis at the shepherd camping site were found to be worth to apply in the area. Use of biodegradable but locally sourced material and engaging local villagers in this endeavor were also found to be in harmony with SDG Goal 1 (no poverty). Therefore, the restoration and its evaluation model could have its future prospects to prove as a successful restoration practice. This restoration practice could not only be worth in high altitude degraded alpine pastures of the Indian Himalayan Region but also to other mountain alpine and sub-alpine ecosystems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8367960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83679602021-08-17 Dayara bugyal restoration model in the alpine and subalpine region of the Central Himalaya: a step toward minimizing the impacts Kuniyal, Jagdish Chandra Maiti, Priyanka Kumar, Sandeep Kumar, Anand Bisht, Nisha Sekar, K. Chandra Arya, Satish Chandra Rai, Sumit Nand, Mahesha Sci Rep Article Eco-restoration initiative work in the high altitude Dayara pastureland (3501 m) from the Indian Himalayan Region has been considered to be one of the successful field demonstration against both natural and anthropogenic degradation. The present study therefore attempts to assess the implications of entire eco-restoration model as practiced by Department of Forest, Government of Uttarakhand in 2019. Its assessment was done by calculating restoration success index by way of considering three categories, viz., direct management measure (M), environmental desirability (E) and socio-economic feasibility (SE) considering 22 individual variables. ‘M’ comprised both biotic and abiotic pressures. Grazing and tourism were biotic, while abiotic pressure was considered mainly soil erosion in alpine area due to topographic fragility. Above ground vegetation profile and below ground soil nutrient profile (N, P, K, pH and water holding capacity) were analyzed in ‘E’ component. In the last but not least, ‘SE’ was analyzed to assess the social acceptability of the local communities and stakeholders who are supposed to be ultimate beneficiary of alike interventions. Direct management measure was found with the variable index score of 0.8 indicating the higher score as compared to environmental desirability (0.56). Under direct management measure, grazing and tourists’ carrying capacity of the area was analyzed with high management needs to call the region sustainable in terms of availability of bio-resources. The ecosystem index score was evaluated for the reference (81.94), treated (64.5) and untreated zones (52.03), wherein increasing profile of these values were found. The outcomes like improved vegetation profile in terms of total herb density, soil nutrient profile of the restored area along with soil pH (4.96) and water holding capacity (49.85%) were found to be restored significantly along with controlling 169.64 tonne year(-1) soil erosion from draining. The assessment of grazing pattern of 118 migratory Cow Unit (CU) (76 horse/mule and 18 sheep/goat, already controlled), 318 local CU (30 horse/mule and 187 sheep/goat) were calculated and recommended to be controlled. Tourists’ carrying capacity of 274 tourists per day and manual removal of Rumex nepalensis at the shepherd camping site were found to be worth to apply in the area. Use of biodegradable but locally sourced material and engaging local villagers in this endeavor were also found to be in harmony with SDG Goal 1 (no poverty). Therefore, the restoration and its evaluation model could have its future prospects to prove as a successful restoration practice. This restoration practice could not only be worth in high altitude degraded alpine pastures of the Indian Himalayan Region but also to other mountain alpine and sub-alpine ecosystems. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8367960/ /pubmed/34400660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95472-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kuniyal, Jagdish Chandra
Maiti, Priyanka
Kumar, Sandeep
Kumar, Anand
Bisht, Nisha
Sekar, K. Chandra
Arya, Satish Chandra
Rai, Sumit
Nand, Mahesha
Dayara bugyal restoration model in the alpine and subalpine region of the Central Himalaya: a step toward minimizing the impacts
title Dayara bugyal restoration model in the alpine and subalpine region of the Central Himalaya: a step toward minimizing the impacts
title_full Dayara bugyal restoration model in the alpine and subalpine region of the Central Himalaya: a step toward minimizing the impacts
title_fullStr Dayara bugyal restoration model in the alpine and subalpine region of the Central Himalaya: a step toward minimizing the impacts
title_full_unstemmed Dayara bugyal restoration model in the alpine and subalpine region of the Central Himalaya: a step toward minimizing the impacts
title_short Dayara bugyal restoration model in the alpine and subalpine region of the Central Himalaya: a step toward minimizing the impacts
title_sort dayara bugyal restoration model in the alpine and subalpine region of the central himalaya: a step toward minimizing the impacts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95472-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kuniyaljagdishchandra dayarabugyalrestorationmodelinthealpineandsubalpineregionofthecentralhimalayaasteptowardminimizingtheimpacts
AT maitipriyanka dayarabugyalrestorationmodelinthealpineandsubalpineregionofthecentralhimalayaasteptowardminimizingtheimpacts
AT kumarsandeep dayarabugyalrestorationmodelinthealpineandsubalpineregionofthecentralhimalayaasteptowardminimizingtheimpacts
AT kumaranand dayarabugyalrestorationmodelinthealpineandsubalpineregionofthecentralhimalayaasteptowardminimizingtheimpacts
AT bishtnisha dayarabugyalrestorationmodelinthealpineandsubalpineregionofthecentralhimalayaasteptowardminimizingtheimpacts
AT sekarkchandra dayarabugyalrestorationmodelinthealpineandsubalpineregionofthecentralhimalayaasteptowardminimizingtheimpacts
AT aryasatishchandra dayarabugyalrestorationmodelinthealpineandsubalpineregionofthecentralhimalayaasteptowardminimizingtheimpacts
AT raisumit dayarabugyalrestorationmodelinthealpineandsubalpineregionofthecentralhimalayaasteptowardminimizingtheimpacts
AT nandmahesha dayarabugyalrestorationmodelinthealpineandsubalpineregionofthecentralhimalayaasteptowardminimizingtheimpacts