Cargando…

Conceptions of Learning and Teaching for Faculty Who Teach Basic Science

INTRODUCTION: Conceptions of learning and teaching refer to what faculty think about teaching effectiveness. Approaches to teaching refer to the methods they use to teach. Both conceptions and approaches range from student-centered/learning-focused (active learner engagement) to teaching-centered/co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carvalho, Helena, Dane, Francis C., Whicker, Shari A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8368879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34457923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01264-4
_version_ 1783739190819684352
author Carvalho, Helena
Dane, Francis C.
Whicker, Shari A.
author_facet Carvalho, Helena
Dane, Francis C.
Whicker, Shari A.
author_sort Carvalho, Helena
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Conceptions of learning and teaching refer to what faculty think about teaching effectiveness. Approaches to teaching refer to the methods they use to teach. Both conceptions and approaches range from student-centered/learning-focused (active learner engagement) to teaching-centered/content-focused (passive learner engagement). This study explored how faculty teaching experience influenced faculty conceptions and their approaches to teaching. The authors hypothesized that more experienced educators appreciate and apply active learning approaches. METHODS: The authors used a cross-sectional survey to collect anonymous data from the Basic Science faculty at Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (VTCSOM). The survey included the Conceptions of Learning and Teaching scale (COLT; Jacobs et al. 2012) and demographic information. They assessed instrument reliability with Cronbach’s alpha and examined relationships between variables with correlation and chi-square and group differences with ANOVA. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent (50/130) of faculty responded to the survey. COLT scores for student-centered (4.06 ± 0.41) were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than teacher-centered (3.12 ± 0.6). Teacher-centered scores were lower (p < 0.05) for younger (30–39, 2.65 ± 0.48) than older faculty (50–59, 3.57 ± 0.71) and were negatively correlated with using multiple teaching methods (p = 0.022). However, 83% (39/50) reported using both traditional lectures and active approaches. DISCUSSION: Faculty conceptions about teaching showed appreciation for active learning, but a tendency to use traditional teaching methods interspersed with student-centered ones. Teaching experience was not related to faculty conceptions but was related to their teaching approaches. The amount of time dedicated to teaching was related to the appreciation of active learning, and young teachers were more student-oriented. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01264-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8368879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83688792021-08-26 Conceptions of Learning and Teaching for Faculty Who Teach Basic Science Carvalho, Helena Dane, Francis C. Whicker, Shari A. Med Sci Educ Original Research INTRODUCTION: Conceptions of learning and teaching refer to what faculty think about teaching effectiveness. Approaches to teaching refer to the methods they use to teach. Both conceptions and approaches range from student-centered/learning-focused (active learner engagement) to teaching-centered/content-focused (passive learner engagement). This study explored how faculty teaching experience influenced faculty conceptions and their approaches to teaching. The authors hypothesized that more experienced educators appreciate and apply active learning approaches. METHODS: The authors used a cross-sectional survey to collect anonymous data from the Basic Science faculty at Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (VTCSOM). The survey included the Conceptions of Learning and Teaching scale (COLT; Jacobs et al. 2012) and demographic information. They assessed instrument reliability with Cronbach’s alpha and examined relationships between variables with correlation and chi-square and group differences with ANOVA. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent (50/130) of faculty responded to the survey. COLT scores for student-centered (4.06 ± 0.41) were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than teacher-centered (3.12 ± 0.6). Teacher-centered scores were lower (p < 0.05) for younger (30–39, 2.65 ± 0.48) than older faculty (50–59, 3.57 ± 0.71) and were negatively correlated with using multiple teaching methods (p = 0.022). However, 83% (39/50) reported using both traditional lectures and active approaches. DISCUSSION: Faculty conceptions about teaching showed appreciation for active learning, but a tendency to use traditional teaching methods interspersed with student-centered ones. Teaching experience was not related to faculty conceptions but was related to their teaching approaches. The amount of time dedicated to teaching was related to the appreciation of active learning, and young teachers were more student-oriented. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01264-4. Springer US 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8368879/ /pubmed/34457923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01264-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Carvalho, Helena
Dane, Francis C.
Whicker, Shari A.
Conceptions of Learning and Teaching for Faculty Who Teach Basic Science
title Conceptions of Learning and Teaching for Faculty Who Teach Basic Science
title_full Conceptions of Learning and Teaching for Faculty Who Teach Basic Science
title_fullStr Conceptions of Learning and Teaching for Faculty Who Teach Basic Science
title_full_unstemmed Conceptions of Learning and Teaching for Faculty Who Teach Basic Science
title_short Conceptions of Learning and Teaching for Faculty Who Teach Basic Science
title_sort conceptions of learning and teaching for faculty who teach basic science
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8368879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34457923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01264-4
work_keys_str_mv AT carvalhohelena conceptionsoflearningandteachingforfacultywhoteachbasicscience
AT danefrancisc conceptionsoflearningandteachingforfacultywhoteachbasicscience
AT whickersharia conceptionsoflearningandteachingforfacultywhoteachbasicscience