Cargando…

Are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? An analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence: in 95 low- and middle-income countries

Studies of inequalities in child health have given limited attention to household structure and headship. The few existing reports on child outcomes in male and female-headed households have produced inconsistent results. The aim of our analyses was to provide a global view of the influence of sex o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wendt, Andrea, Hellwig, Franciele, Saad, Ghada E., Faye, Cheikh, Mokomane, Zitha, Boerma, Ties, Barros, Aluisio J.D., Victora, Cesar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100888
_version_ 1783739198718607360
author Wendt, Andrea
Hellwig, Franciele
Saad, Ghada E.
Faye, Cheikh
Mokomane, Zitha
Boerma, Ties
Barros, Aluisio J.D.
Victora, Cesar
author_facet Wendt, Andrea
Hellwig, Franciele
Saad, Ghada E.
Faye, Cheikh
Mokomane, Zitha
Boerma, Ties
Barros, Aluisio J.D.
Victora, Cesar
author_sort Wendt, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Studies of inequalities in child health have given limited attention to household structure and headship. The few existing reports on child outcomes in male and female-headed households have produced inconsistent results. The aim of our analyses was to provide a global view of the influence of sex of the household head on child health in cross-sectional surveys from up to 95 LMICs. Studied outcomes were full immunization coverage in children aged 12–23 months and stunting prevalence in under-five children. We analyzed the most recent nationally-representative surveys for each country (since 2010) with available data. After initial exploratory analyses, we focused on three types of households: a) male-headed household (MHH) comprised 73.1% of all households in the pooled analyses; b) female Headed Household (FHH) with at least one adult male represented 9.8% of households; and c) FHH without an adult male accounted for 15.0% of households. Our analyses also included the following covariates: wealth index, education of the child’s mother and urban/rural residence. Meta-analytic approaches were used to calculate pooled effects across the countries with MHH as the reference category. Regarding full immunization, the pooled prevalence ratio for FHH (any male) was 0.99 (0.97; 1.01) and that for FHH (no male) was 0.99 (0.97; 1.02). For stunting prevalence, the pooled prevalence ratio for FHH (any male) was 1.00 (0.98; 1.02) and for FHH (no male) was 1.00 (0.98; 1.02). Adjustment for covariates did not lead to any noteworthy change in the results. No particular patterns were found among different world regions. A few countries presented significant inequalities with different directions of association, indicating the diversity of FHH and how complex the meaning and measurement of household headship may be. Further research is warranted to understand context, examine mediating factors, and exploring alternative definitions of household headship in countries with some association.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8369002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83690022021-08-23 Are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? An analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence: in 95 low- and middle-income countries Wendt, Andrea Hellwig, Franciele Saad, Ghada E. Faye, Cheikh Mokomane, Zitha Boerma, Ties Barros, Aluisio J.D. Victora, Cesar SSM Popul Health Article Studies of inequalities in child health have given limited attention to household structure and headship. The few existing reports on child outcomes in male and female-headed households have produced inconsistent results. The aim of our analyses was to provide a global view of the influence of sex of the household head on child health in cross-sectional surveys from up to 95 LMICs. Studied outcomes were full immunization coverage in children aged 12–23 months and stunting prevalence in under-five children. We analyzed the most recent nationally-representative surveys for each country (since 2010) with available data. After initial exploratory analyses, we focused on three types of households: a) male-headed household (MHH) comprised 73.1% of all households in the pooled analyses; b) female Headed Household (FHH) with at least one adult male represented 9.8% of households; and c) FHH without an adult male accounted for 15.0% of households. Our analyses also included the following covariates: wealth index, education of the child’s mother and urban/rural residence. Meta-analytic approaches were used to calculate pooled effects across the countries with MHH as the reference category. Regarding full immunization, the pooled prevalence ratio for FHH (any male) was 0.99 (0.97; 1.01) and that for FHH (no male) was 0.99 (0.97; 1.02). For stunting prevalence, the pooled prevalence ratio for FHH (any male) was 1.00 (0.98; 1.02) and for FHH (no male) was 1.00 (0.98; 1.02). Adjustment for covariates did not lead to any noteworthy change in the results. No particular patterns were found among different world regions. A few countries presented significant inequalities with different directions of association, indicating the diversity of FHH and how complex the meaning and measurement of household headship may be. Further research is warranted to understand context, examine mediating factors, and exploring alternative definitions of household headship in countries with some association. Elsevier 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8369002/ /pubmed/34430700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100888 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wendt, Andrea
Hellwig, Franciele
Saad, Ghada E.
Faye, Cheikh
Mokomane, Zitha
Boerma, Ties
Barros, Aluisio J.D.
Victora, Cesar
Are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? An analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence: in 95 low- and middle-income countries
title Are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? An analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence: in 95 low- and middle-income countries
title_full Are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? An analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence: in 95 low- and middle-income countries
title_fullStr Are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? An analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence: in 95 low- and middle-income countries
title_full_unstemmed Are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? An analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence: in 95 low- and middle-income countries
title_short Are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? An analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence: in 95 low- and middle-income countries
title_sort are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? an analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence: in 95 low- and middle-income countries
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100888
work_keys_str_mv AT wendtandrea arechildreninfemaleheadedhouseholdsatadisadvantageananalysisofimmunizationcoverageandstuntingprevalencein95lowandmiddleincomecountries
AT hellwigfranciele arechildreninfemaleheadedhouseholdsatadisadvantageananalysisofimmunizationcoverageandstuntingprevalencein95lowandmiddleincomecountries
AT saadghadae arechildreninfemaleheadedhouseholdsatadisadvantageananalysisofimmunizationcoverageandstuntingprevalencein95lowandmiddleincomecountries
AT fayecheikh arechildreninfemaleheadedhouseholdsatadisadvantageananalysisofimmunizationcoverageandstuntingprevalencein95lowandmiddleincomecountries
AT mokomanezitha arechildreninfemaleheadedhouseholdsatadisadvantageananalysisofimmunizationcoverageandstuntingprevalencein95lowandmiddleincomecountries
AT boermaties arechildreninfemaleheadedhouseholdsatadisadvantageananalysisofimmunizationcoverageandstuntingprevalencein95lowandmiddleincomecountries
AT barrosaluisiojd arechildreninfemaleheadedhouseholdsatadisadvantageananalysisofimmunizationcoverageandstuntingprevalencein95lowandmiddleincomecountries
AT victoracesar arechildreninfemaleheadedhouseholdsatadisadvantageananalysisofimmunizationcoverageandstuntingprevalencein95lowandmiddleincomecountries