Cargando…
‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life
BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to evaluate to what extent Zero2 Expo's ‘Birthing a Better Future’, a co‐created multimedia exhibition, was effective in raising awareness on the importance of the first 1001 days of life and explore what refinements would help to optimize the impact of future exhibi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33932315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13259 |
_version_ | 1783739215374188544 |
---|---|
author | Lakhanpaul, Maya Alexander, Emma C. Cupp, Meghan A. Owugha, Jessica Taripre Florschutz, Alex Beckingham, Andy Kisan, Virad Lakhanpaul, Monica Manikam, Logan |
author_facet | Lakhanpaul, Maya Alexander, Emma C. Cupp, Meghan A. Owugha, Jessica Taripre Florschutz, Alex Beckingham, Andy Kisan, Virad Lakhanpaul, Monica Manikam, Logan |
author_sort | Lakhanpaul, Maya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to evaluate to what extent Zero2 Expo's ‘Birthing a Better Future’, a co‐created multimedia exhibition, was effective in raising awareness on the importance of the first 1001 days of life and explore what refinements would help to optimize the impact of future exhibitions. METHODS: We conducted a mixed‐methods evaluation of the exhibition delivered in the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. Through convenience sampling, 14 participants were selected to participate in 12 structured interviews and 19 participants completed a questionnaire. Interviews were thematically analysed alongside quantitative analysis of questionnaire responses through Likert scales. RESULTS: The majority (78.6%, n = 11/14) of participants who completed the questionnaire either agreed or strongly agreed that the exhibition raised their awareness about the first 1001 days of life. This was supported by the analysis of interviews. The use of art was found to provoke an emotional engagement from participants. Participants felt that the length of the written pieces and location of the exhibition were important factors for designers to consider in future exhibitions. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that multimedia exhibitions, combining science with art, may be an effective way to raise awareness of public health messages. Engaging with key stakeholders will be an essential step in order to improve future public health exhibitions. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: When designing the study, the public reviewed the study tools, which were refined based on their feedback. At every phase of the study, members of the public who are artists co‐created the exhibition content. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8369082 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83690822021-08-23 ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life Lakhanpaul, Maya Alexander, Emma C. Cupp, Meghan A. Owugha, Jessica Taripre Florschutz, Alex Beckingham, Andy Kisan, Virad Lakhanpaul, Monica Manikam, Logan Health Expect Original Articles BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to evaluate to what extent Zero2 Expo's ‘Birthing a Better Future’, a co‐created multimedia exhibition, was effective in raising awareness on the importance of the first 1001 days of life and explore what refinements would help to optimize the impact of future exhibitions. METHODS: We conducted a mixed‐methods evaluation of the exhibition delivered in the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. Through convenience sampling, 14 participants were selected to participate in 12 structured interviews and 19 participants completed a questionnaire. Interviews were thematically analysed alongside quantitative analysis of questionnaire responses through Likert scales. RESULTS: The majority (78.6%, n = 11/14) of participants who completed the questionnaire either agreed or strongly agreed that the exhibition raised their awareness about the first 1001 days of life. This was supported by the analysis of interviews. The use of art was found to provoke an emotional engagement from participants. Participants felt that the length of the written pieces and location of the exhibition were important factors for designers to consider in future exhibitions. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that multimedia exhibitions, combining science with art, may be an effective way to raise awareness of public health messages. Engaging with key stakeholders will be an essential step in order to improve future public health exhibitions. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: When designing the study, the public reviewed the study tools, which were refined based on their feedback. At every phase of the study, members of the public who are artists co‐created the exhibition content. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-01 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8369082/ /pubmed/33932315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13259 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Lakhanpaul, Maya Alexander, Emma C. Cupp, Meghan A. Owugha, Jessica Taripre Florschutz, Alex Beckingham, Andy Kisan, Virad Lakhanpaul, Monica Manikam, Logan ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life |
title | ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life |
title_full | ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life |
title_fullStr | ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life |
title_short | ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life |
title_sort | ‘birthing a better future’: a mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33932315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13259 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lakhanpaulmaya birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife AT alexanderemmac birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife AT cuppmeghana birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife AT owughajessicataripre birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife AT florschutzalex birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife AT beckinghamandy birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife AT kisanvirad birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife AT lakhanpaulmonica birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife AT manikamlogan birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife |