Cargando…

‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to evaluate to what extent Zero2 Expo's ‘Birthing a Better Future’, a co‐created multimedia exhibition, was effective in raising awareness on the importance of the first 1001 days of life and explore what refinements would help to optimize the impact of future exhibi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lakhanpaul, Maya, Alexander, Emma C., Cupp, Meghan A., Owugha, Jessica Taripre, Florschutz, Alex, Beckingham, Andy, Kisan, Virad, Lakhanpaul, Monica, Manikam, Logan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33932315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13259
_version_ 1783739215374188544
author Lakhanpaul, Maya
Alexander, Emma C.
Cupp, Meghan A.
Owugha, Jessica Taripre
Florschutz, Alex
Beckingham, Andy
Kisan, Virad
Lakhanpaul, Monica
Manikam, Logan
author_facet Lakhanpaul, Maya
Alexander, Emma C.
Cupp, Meghan A.
Owugha, Jessica Taripre
Florschutz, Alex
Beckingham, Andy
Kisan, Virad
Lakhanpaul, Monica
Manikam, Logan
author_sort Lakhanpaul, Maya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to evaluate to what extent Zero2 Expo's ‘Birthing a Better Future’, a co‐created multimedia exhibition, was effective in raising awareness on the importance of the first 1001 days of life and explore what refinements would help to optimize the impact of future exhibitions. METHODS: We conducted a mixed‐methods evaluation of the exhibition delivered in the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. Through convenience sampling, 14 participants were selected to participate in 12 structured interviews and 19 participants completed a questionnaire. Interviews were thematically analysed alongside quantitative analysis of questionnaire responses through Likert scales. RESULTS: The majority (78.6%, n = 11/14) of participants who completed the questionnaire either agreed or strongly agreed that the exhibition raised their awareness about the first 1001 days of life. This was supported by the analysis of interviews. The use of art was found to provoke an emotional engagement from participants. Participants felt that the length of the written pieces and location of the exhibition were important factors for designers to consider in future exhibitions. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that multimedia exhibitions, combining science with art, may be an effective way to raise awareness of public health messages. Engaging with key stakeholders will be an essential step in order to improve future public health exhibitions. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: When designing the study, the public reviewed the study tools, which were refined based on their feedback. At every phase of the study, members of the public who are artists co‐created the exhibition content.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8369082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83690822021-08-23 ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life Lakhanpaul, Maya Alexander, Emma C. Cupp, Meghan A. Owugha, Jessica Taripre Florschutz, Alex Beckingham, Andy Kisan, Virad Lakhanpaul, Monica Manikam, Logan Health Expect Original Articles BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to evaluate to what extent Zero2 Expo's ‘Birthing a Better Future’, a co‐created multimedia exhibition, was effective in raising awareness on the importance of the first 1001 days of life and explore what refinements would help to optimize the impact of future exhibitions. METHODS: We conducted a mixed‐methods evaluation of the exhibition delivered in the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. Through convenience sampling, 14 participants were selected to participate in 12 structured interviews and 19 participants completed a questionnaire. Interviews were thematically analysed alongside quantitative analysis of questionnaire responses through Likert scales. RESULTS: The majority (78.6%, n = 11/14) of participants who completed the questionnaire either agreed or strongly agreed that the exhibition raised their awareness about the first 1001 days of life. This was supported by the analysis of interviews. The use of art was found to provoke an emotional engagement from participants. Participants felt that the length of the written pieces and location of the exhibition were important factors for designers to consider in future exhibitions. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that multimedia exhibitions, combining science with art, may be an effective way to raise awareness of public health messages. Engaging with key stakeholders will be an essential step in order to improve future public health exhibitions. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: When designing the study, the public reviewed the study tools, which were refined based on their feedback. At every phase of the study, members of the public who are artists co‐created the exhibition content. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-01 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8369082/ /pubmed/33932315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13259 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lakhanpaul, Maya
Alexander, Emma C.
Cupp, Meghan A.
Owugha, Jessica Taripre
Florschutz, Alex
Beckingham, Andy
Kisan, Virad
Lakhanpaul, Monica
Manikam, Logan
‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life
title ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life
title_full ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life
title_fullStr ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life
title_full_unstemmed ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life
title_short ‘Birthing a Better Future’: A mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life
title_sort ‘birthing a better future’: a mixed‐methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33932315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13259
work_keys_str_mv AT lakhanpaulmaya birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife
AT alexanderemmac birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife
AT cuppmeghana birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife
AT owughajessicataripre birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife
AT florschutzalex birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife
AT beckinghamandy birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife
AT kisanvirad birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife
AT lakhanpaulmonica birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife
AT manikamlogan birthingabetterfutureamixedmethodsevaluationofanexhibitionontheearlyyearsoflife