Cargando…

A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty

BACKGROUND: Health‐care providers increasingly have to discuss uncertainty with patients. Awareness of uncertainty can affect patients variably, depending on how it is communicated. To date, no overview existed for health‐care professionals on how to discuss uncertainty. OBJECTIVE: To generate an ov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medendorp, Niki M., Stiggelbout, Anne M., Aalfs, Cora M., Han, Paul K. J., Smets, Ellen M. A., Hillen, Marij A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13255
_version_ 1783739223263674368
author Medendorp, Niki M.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Aalfs, Cora M.
Han, Paul K. J.
Smets, Ellen M. A.
Hillen, Marij A.
author_facet Medendorp, Niki M.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Aalfs, Cora M.
Han, Paul K. J.
Smets, Ellen M. A.
Hillen, Marij A.
author_sort Medendorp, Niki M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health‐care providers increasingly have to discuss uncertainty with patients. Awareness of uncertainty can affect patients variably, depending on how it is communicated. To date, no overview existed for health‐care professionals on how to discuss uncertainty. OBJECTIVE: To generate an overview of available recommendations on how to communicate uncertainty with patients during clinical encounters. SEARCH STRATEGY: A scoping review was conducted. Four databases were searched following the PRISMA‐ScR statement. Independent screening by two researchers was performed of titles and abstracts, and subsequently full texts. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Any (non‐)empirical papers were included describing recommendations for any health‐care provider on how to orally communicate uncertainty to patients. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on provided recommendations and their characteristics (eg, target group and strength of evidence base) were extracted. Recommendations were narratively synthesized into a comprehensible overview for clinical practice. RESULTS: Forty‐seven publications were included. Recommendations were based on empirical findings in 23 publications. After narrative synthesis, 13 recommendations emerged pertaining to three overarching goals: (a) preparing for the discussion of uncertainty, (b) informing patients about uncertainty and (c) helping patients deal with uncertainty. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: A variety of recommendations on how to orally communicate uncertainty are available, but most lack an evidence base. More substantial research is needed to assess the effects of the suggested communicative approaches. Until then, health‐care providers may use our overview of communication strategies as a toolbox to optimize communication about uncertainty with patients. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Results were presented to stakeholders (physicians) to check and improve their practical applicability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8369117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83691172021-08-23 A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty Medendorp, Niki M. Stiggelbout, Anne M. Aalfs, Cora M. Han, Paul K. J. Smets, Ellen M. A. Hillen, Marij A. Health Expect Review Articles BACKGROUND: Health‐care providers increasingly have to discuss uncertainty with patients. Awareness of uncertainty can affect patients variably, depending on how it is communicated. To date, no overview existed for health‐care professionals on how to discuss uncertainty. OBJECTIVE: To generate an overview of available recommendations on how to communicate uncertainty with patients during clinical encounters. SEARCH STRATEGY: A scoping review was conducted. Four databases were searched following the PRISMA‐ScR statement. Independent screening by two researchers was performed of titles and abstracts, and subsequently full texts. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Any (non‐)empirical papers were included describing recommendations for any health‐care provider on how to orally communicate uncertainty to patients. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on provided recommendations and their characteristics (eg, target group and strength of evidence base) were extracted. Recommendations were narratively synthesized into a comprehensible overview for clinical practice. RESULTS: Forty‐seven publications were included. Recommendations were based on empirical findings in 23 publications. After narrative synthesis, 13 recommendations emerged pertaining to three overarching goals: (a) preparing for the discussion of uncertainty, (b) informing patients about uncertainty and (c) helping patients deal with uncertainty. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: A variety of recommendations on how to orally communicate uncertainty are available, but most lack an evidence base. More substantial research is needed to assess the effects of the suggested communicative approaches. Until then, health‐care providers may use our overview of communication strategies as a toolbox to optimize communication about uncertainty with patients. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Results were presented to stakeholders (physicians) to check and improve their practical applicability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-08 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8369117/ /pubmed/34101951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13255 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Medendorp, Niki M.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Aalfs, Cora M.
Han, Paul K. J.
Smets, Ellen M. A.
Hillen, Marij A.
A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty
title A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty
title_full A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty
title_fullStr A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty
title_short A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty
title_sort scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13255
work_keys_str_mv AT medendorpnikim ascopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty
AT stiggelboutannem ascopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty
AT aalfscoram ascopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty
AT hanpaulkj ascopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty
AT smetsellenma ascopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty
AT hillenmarija ascopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty
AT medendorpnikim scopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty
AT stiggelboutannem scopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty
AT aalfscoram scopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty
AT hanpaulkj scopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty
AT smetsellenma scopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty
AT hillenmarija scopingreviewofpracticerecommendationsforclinicianscommunicationofuncertainty