Cargando…

Assessment of primary prevention patients receiving an ICD – Systematic evaluation of ATP: APPRAISE ATP

BACKGROUND: The value of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in the overall cohort of primary prevention patients who receive implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) remains uncertain. ATP success reported in prior trials potentially included a large number of patients receiving unnecessary ATP for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuger, Claudio D., Ando, Kenji, Cantillon, Daniel J., Lambiase, Pier D., Mont, Lluis, Joung, Bo Young, Peress, Darren, Yong, Patrick, Wold, Nicholas, Daubert, James P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.07.003
_version_ 1783739261956128768
author Schuger, Claudio D.
Ando, Kenji
Cantillon, Daniel J.
Lambiase, Pier D.
Mont, Lluis
Joung, Bo Young
Peress, Darren
Yong, Patrick
Wold, Nicholas
Daubert, James P.
author_facet Schuger, Claudio D.
Ando, Kenji
Cantillon, Daniel J.
Lambiase, Pier D.
Mont, Lluis
Joung, Bo Young
Peress, Darren
Yong, Patrick
Wold, Nicholas
Daubert, James P.
author_sort Schuger, Claudio D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The value of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in the overall cohort of primary prevention patients who receive implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) remains uncertain. ATP success reported in prior trials potentially included a large number of patients receiving unnecessary ATP for arrhythmias that may have self-terminated owing to the prematurity of the intervention. Although some patients derive benefit from initial ATP in terminating rapid ventricular arrhythmias and thereby preventing shocks, there are limited data allowing us to identify those patients a priori. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of APPRAISE ATP is to understand the role of ATP in primary prevention patients currently indicated for ICD therapy in a large prospective randomized controlled trial with modern programming parameters. METHODS: The study is a global, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial conducted at up to 150 sites globally, enrolling approximately 2600 subjects The primary endpoint of the trial is time to first all-cause shock in a 2-arm study with an equivalent study design in which the incidence of all-cause shocks will be compared between primary prevention subjects programmed with shocks only vs subjects programmed to standard therapy (ATP and shock). RESULTS: An Electrogram and Device Interrogation Core Laboratory will review interrogation data to determine primary endpoints that occur in APPRAISE ATP. Their decisions are based on independent physician review of the data from device interrogation. CONCLUSION: The ultimate purpose of the study is to aid clinicians in the selection of ICD technologies based on hard endpoint evidence across the spectrum of indications for primary prevention implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8369290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83692902021-08-23 Assessment of primary prevention patients receiving an ICD – Systematic evaluation of ATP: APPRAISE ATP Schuger, Claudio D. Ando, Kenji Cantillon, Daniel J. Lambiase, Pier D. Mont, Lluis Joung, Bo Young Peress, Darren Yong, Patrick Wold, Nicholas Daubert, James P. Heart Rhythm O2 Design Paper BACKGROUND: The value of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in the overall cohort of primary prevention patients who receive implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) remains uncertain. ATP success reported in prior trials potentially included a large number of patients receiving unnecessary ATP for arrhythmias that may have self-terminated owing to the prematurity of the intervention. Although some patients derive benefit from initial ATP in terminating rapid ventricular arrhythmias and thereby preventing shocks, there are limited data allowing us to identify those patients a priori. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of APPRAISE ATP is to understand the role of ATP in primary prevention patients currently indicated for ICD therapy in a large prospective randomized controlled trial with modern programming parameters. METHODS: The study is a global, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial conducted at up to 150 sites globally, enrolling approximately 2600 subjects The primary endpoint of the trial is time to first all-cause shock in a 2-arm study with an equivalent study design in which the incidence of all-cause shocks will be compared between primary prevention subjects programmed with shocks only vs subjects programmed to standard therapy (ATP and shock). RESULTS: An Electrogram and Device Interrogation Core Laboratory will review interrogation data to determine primary endpoints that occur in APPRAISE ATP. Their decisions are based on independent physician review of the data from device interrogation. CONCLUSION: The ultimate purpose of the study is to aid clinicians in the selection of ICD technologies based on hard endpoint evidence across the spectrum of indications for primary prevention implantation. Elsevier 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8369290/ /pubmed/34430946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.07.003 Text en © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Design Paper
Schuger, Claudio D.
Ando, Kenji
Cantillon, Daniel J.
Lambiase, Pier D.
Mont, Lluis
Joung, Bo Young
Peress, Darren
Yong, Patrick
Wold, Nicholas
Daubert, James P.
Assessment of primary prevention patients receiving an ICD – Systematic evaluation of ATP: APPRAISE ATP
title Assessment of primary prevention patients receiving an ICD – Systematic evaluation of ATP: APPRAISE ATP
title_full Assessment of primary prevention patients receiving an ICD – Systematic evaluation of ATP: APPRAISE ATP
title_fullStr Assessment of primary prevention patients receiving an ICD – Systematic evaluation of ATP: APPRAISE ATP
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of primary prevention patients receiving an ICD – Systematic evaluation of ATP: APPRAISE ATP
title_short Assessment of primary prevention patients receiving an ICD – Systematic evaluation of ATP: APPRAISE ATP
title_sort assessment of primary prevention patients receiving an icd – systematic evaluation of atp: appraise atp
topic Design Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.07.003
work_keys_str_mv AT schugerclaudiod assessmentofprimarypreventionpatientsreceivinganicdsystematicevaluationofatpappraiseatp
AT andokenji assessmentofprimarypreventionpatientsreceivinganicdsystematicevaluationofatpappraiseatp
AT cantillondanielj assessmentofprimarypreventionpatientsreceivinganicdsystematicevaluationofatpappraiseatp
AT lambiasepierd assessmentofprimarypreventionpatientsreceivinganicdsystematicevaluationofatpappraiseatp
AT montlluis assessmentofprimarypreventionpatientsreceivinganicdsystematicevaluationofatpappraiseatp
AT joungboyoung assessmentofprimarypreventionpatientsreceivinganicdsystematicevaluationofatpappraiseatp
AT peressdarren assessmentofprimarypreventionpatientsreceivinganicdsystematicevaluationofatpappraiseatp
AT yongpatrick assessmentofprimarypreventionpatientsreceivinganicdsystematicevaluationofatpappraiseatp
AT woldnicholas assessmentofprimarypreventionpatientsreceivinganicdsystematicevaluationofatpappraiseatp
AT daubertjamesp assessmentofprimarypreventionpatientsreceivinganicdsystematicevaluationofatpappraiseatp