Cargando…

The physiological effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on aortic and pulmonary flow and dynamic and static components of systemic impedance

BACKGROUND: Patients who improve following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have left ventricular (LV) remodeling and improved cardiac output (CO). Effects on the systemic circulation are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of CRT on aortic and pulmonary blood flow and systemic afterlo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sidhu, Baldeep S., Claridge, Simon, Gu, Haotian, Li, Ye, Gould, Justin, Porter, Bradley, Elliott, Mark K., Mehta, Vishal, Jackson, Tom, Patterson, Tiffany, Briceno, Natalia, Lee, Jack, Redwood, Simon, Adhya, Shaumik, Niederer, Steven A., Chowienczyk, Phil, Rinaldi, Christopher A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.05.007
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Patients who improve following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have left ventricular (LV) remodeling and improved cardiac output (CO). Effects on the systemic circulation are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of CRT on aortic and pulmonary blood flow and systemic afterload. METHODS: At CRT implant patients underwent a noninvasive assessment of central hemodynamics, including wave intensity analysis (n = 28). This was repeated at 6 months after CRT. A subsample (n = 11) underwent an invasive electrophysiological and hemodynamic assessment immediately following CRT. CRT response was defined as reduction in LV end-systolic volume ≥15% at 6 months. RESULTS: In CRT responders (75% of those in the noninvasive arm), there was a significant increase in CO (from 3 ± 2 L/min to 4 ± 2 L/min, P = .002) and LV dP/dt(max) (from 846 ± 162 mm Hg/s to 958 ± 194 mm Hg/s, P = .001), immediately after CRT in those in the invasive arm. They demonstrated a significant increase in aortic forward compression wave (FCW) both acutely and at follow-up. The relative change in LV dP/dt(max) strongly correlated with changes in the aortic FCW (R(s) 0.733, P = .025). CRT responders displayed a significant reduction in afterload, and a decrease in systemic vascular resistance and pulse wave velocity acutely; there was a significant decrease in acute pulmonary afterload measured by the pulmonary FCW and forward expansion wave. CONCLUSION: Improved cardiac function following CRT is attributable to a combination of changes in the cardiac and cardiovascular system. The relative importance of these 2 mechanisms may then be important for optimizing CRT.