Cargando…
Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research
BACKGROUND: Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is among the most frequently employed methods in the biomedical sciences. However, the problems of NHST and p-values have been discussed widely and various Bayesian alternatives have been proposed. Some proposals focus on equivalence testing, w...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01341-7 |
_version_ | 1783739271557939200 |
---|---|
author | Kelter, Riko |
author_facet | Kelter, Riko |
author_sort | Kelter, Riko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is among the most frequently employed methods in the biomedical sciences. However, the problems of NHST and p-values have been discussed widely and various Bayesian alternatives have been proposed. Some proposals focus on equivalence testing, which aims at testing an interval hypothesis instead of a precise hypothesis. An interval hypothesis includes a small range of parameter values instead of a single null value and the idea goes back to Hodges and Lehmann. As researchers can always expect to observe some (although often negligibly small) effect size, interval hypotheses are more realistic for biomedical research. However, the selection of an equivalence region (the interval boundaries) often seems arbitrary and several Bayesian approaches to equivalence testing coexist. METHODS: A new proposal is made how to determine the equivalence region for Bayesian equivalence tests based on objective criteria like type I error rate and power. Existing approaches to Bayesian equivalence testing in the two-sample setting are discussed with a focus on the Bayes factor and the region of practical equivalence (ROPE). A simulation study derives the necessary results to make use of the new method in the two-sample setting, which is among the most frequently carried out procedures in biomedical research. RESULTS: Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence differ in their sensitivity to the prior modeling, power, and the associated type I error rates. The relationship between type I error rates, power and sample sizes for existing Bayesian equivalence tests is identified in the two-sample setting. Results allow to determine the equivalence region based on the new method by incorporating such objective criteria. Importantly, results show that not only can prior selection influence the type I error rate and power, but the relationship is even reverse for the Bayes factor and ROPE based equivalence tests. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, researchers can select between the existing Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence and determine the equivalence region based on objective criteria, thus improving the reproducibility of biomedical research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8369333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83693332021-08-17 Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research Kelter, Riko BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is among the most frequently employed methods in the biomedical sciences. However, the problems of NHST and p-values have been discussed widely and various Bayesian alternatives have been proposed. Some proposals focus on equivalence testing, which aims at testing an interval hypothesis instead of a precise hypothesis. An interval hypothesis includes a small range of parameter values instead of a single null value and the idea goes back to Hodges and Lehmann. As researchers can always expect to observe some (although often negligibly small) effect size, interval hypotheses are more realistic for biomedical research. However, the selection of an equivalence region (the interval boundaries) often seems arbitrary and several Bayesian approaches to equivalence testing coexist. METHODS: A new proposal is made how to determine the equivalence region for Bayesian equivalence tests based on objective criteria like type I error rate and power. Existing approaches to Bayesian equivalence testing in the two-sample setting are discussed with a focus on the Bayes factor and the region of practical equivalence (ROPE). A simulation study derives the necessary results to make use of the new method in the two-sample setting, which is among the most frequently carried out procedures in biomedical research. RESULTS: Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence differ in their sensitivity to the prior modeling, power, and the associated type I error rates. The relationship between type I error rates, power and sample sizes for existing Bayesian equivalence tests is identified in the two-sample setting. Results allow to determine the equivalence region based on the new method by incorporating such objective criteria. Importantly, results show that not only can prior selection influence the type I error rate and power, but the relationship is even reverse for the Bayes factor and ROPE based equivalence tests. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, researchers can select between the existing Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence and determine the equivalence region based on objective criteria, thus improving the reproducibility of biomedical research. BioMed Central 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8369333/ /pubmed/34404344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01341-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kelter, Riko Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research |
title | Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research |
title_full | Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research |
title_fullStr | Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research |
title_full_unstemmed | Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research |
title_short | Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research |
title_sort | bayesian hodges-lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: power analysis, type i error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01341-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kelterriko bayesianhodgeslehmanntestsforstatisticalequivalenceinthetwosamplesettingpoweranalysistypeierrorratesandequivalenceboundaryselectioninbiomedicalresearch |