Cargando…

Probability of Alzheimer’s disease based on common and rare genetic variants

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer’s disease, among other neurodegenerative disorders, spans decades in individuals’ life and exhibits complex progression, symptoms and pathophysiology. Early diagnosis is essential for disease prevention and therapeutic intervention. Genetics may help identify individuals at hig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Escott-Price, Valentina, Schmidt, Karl Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00884-7
_version_ 1783739341495861248
author Escott-Price, Valentina
Schmidt, Karl Michael
author_facet Escott-Price, Valentina
Schmidt, Karl Michael
author_sort Escott-Price, Valentina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alzheimer’s disease, among other neurodegenerative disorders, spans decades in individuals’ life and exhibits complex progression, symptoms and pathophysiology. Early diagnosis is essential for disease prevention and therapeutic intervention. Genetics may help identify individuals at high risk. As thousands of genetic variants may contribute to the genetic risk of Alzheimer’s disease, the polygenic risk score (PRS) approach has been shown to be useful for disease risk prediction. The APOE-ε4 allele is a known common variant associated with high risk to AD, but also associated with earlier onset. Rare variants usually have higher effect sizes than common ones; their impact may not be well captured by the PRS. Instead of standardised PRS, we propose to calculate the disease probability as a measure of disease risk that allows comparison between individuals. METHODS: We estimate AD risk as a probability based on PRS and separately accounting for APOE, AD rare variants and the disease prevalence in age groups. The mathematical framework makes use of genetic variants effect sizes from summary statistics and AD disease prevalence in age groups. RESULTS: The AD probability varies with respect to age, APOE status and presence of rare variants. In age group 65+, the probability of AD grows from 0.03 to 0.18 (without APOE) and 0.07 to 0.7 (APOE e4e4 carriers) as PRS increases. In 85+, these values are 0.08–0.6 and 0.3–0.85. Presence of rare mutations, e.g. in TREM2, may increase the probability (in 65+) from 0.02 at the negative tail of the PRS to 0.3. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach accounts for the varying disease prevalence in different genotype and age groups when modelling the APOE and rare genetic variants risk in addition to PRS. This approach has potential for use in a clinical setting and can easily be updated for novel rare variants and for other populations or confounding factors when appropriate genome-wide association data become available. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13195-021-00884-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8369699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83696992021-08-18 Probability of Alzheimer’s disease based on common and rare genetic variants Escott-Price, Valentina Schmidt, Karl Michael Alzheimers Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Alzheimer’s disease, among other neurodegenerative disorders, spans decades in individuals’ life and exhibits complex progression, symptoms and pathophysiology. Early diagnosis is essential for disease prevention and therapeutic intervention. Genetics may help identify individuals at high risk. As thousands of genetic variants may contribute to the genetic risk of Alzheimer’s disease, the polygenic risk score (PRS) approach has been shown to be useful for disease risk prediction. The APOE-ε4 allele is a known common variant associated with high risk to AD, but also associated with earlier onset. Rare variants usually have higher effect sizes than common ones; their impact may not be well captured by the PRS. Instead of standardised PRS, we propose to calculate the disease probability as a measure of disease risk that allows comparison between individuals. METHODS: We estimate AD risk as a probability based on PRS and separately accounting for APOE, AD rare variants and the disease prevalence in age groups. The mathematical framework makes use of genetic variants effect sizes from summary statistics and AD disease prevalence in age groups. RESULTS: The AD probability varies with respect to age, APOE status and presence of rare variants. In age group 65+, the probability of AD grows from 0.03 to 0.18 (without APOE) and 0.07 to 0.7 (APOE e4e4 carriers) as PRS increases. In 85+, these values are 0.08–0.6 and 0.3–0.85. Presence of rare mutations, e.g. in TREM2, may increase the probability (in 65+) from 0.02 at the negative tail of the PRS to 0.3. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach accounts for the varying disease prevalence in different genotype and age groups when modelling the APOE and rare genetic variants risk in addition to PRS. This approach has potential for use in a clinical setting and can easily be updated for novel rare variants and for other populations or confounding factors when appropriate genome-wide association data become available. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13195-021-00884-7. BioMed Central 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8369699/ /pubmed/34404470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00884-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Escott-Price, Valentina
Schmidt, Karl Michael
Probability of Alzheimer’s disease based on common and rare genetic variants
title Probability of Alzheimer’s disease based on common and rare genetic variants
title_full Probability of Alzheimer’s disease based on common and rare genetic variants
title_fullStr Probability of Alzheimer’s disease based on common and rare genetic variants
title_full_unstemmed Probability of Alzheimer’s disease based on common and rare genetic variants
title_short Probability of Alzheimer’s disease based on common and rare genetic variants
title_sort probability of alzheimer’s disease based on common and rare genetic variants
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00884-7
work_keys_str_mv AT escottpricevalentina probabilityofalzheimersdiseasebasedoncommonandraregeneticvariants
AT schmidtkarlmichael probabilityofalzheimersdiseasebasedoncommonandraregeneticvariants