Cargando…

Adherence to Car Seat Tolerance Screening Differs by Indication and Patient Characteristics

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether adherence to institutional car seat tolerance screening (CSTS) guidelines differed for infants born preterm (PTM), term low birth weight (T-LBW), or both preterm and low birth weight (P-LBW), and to examine the association between CSTS adherence and patient characterist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLaurin-Jiang, Skyler, Weinberger, Morris, Ritter, Victor, O’Shea, T. Michael, Flower, Kori B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03220-5
_version_ 1783739374307901440
author McLaurin-Jiang, Skyler
Weinberger, Morris
Ritter, Victor
O’Shea, T. Michael
Flower, Kori B.
author_facet McLaurin-Jiang, Skyler
Weinberger, Morris
Ritter, Victor
O’Shea, T. Michael
Flower, Kori B.
author_sort McLaurin-Jiang, Skyler
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess whether adherence to institutional car seat tolerance screening (CSTS) guidelines differed for infants born preterm (PTM), term low birth weight (T-LBW), or both preterm and low birth weight (P-LBW), and to examine the association between CSTS adherence and patient characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Within two large academic and community hospitals, we retrospectively reviewed all infants meeting institutional criteria (< 37 weeks’ gestation and/or < 2.27 kg) for CSTS from 2014 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association of patient characteristics with institutional CSTS guideline adherence. RESULTS: 4374 eligible infants were born PTM (50.9%), T-LBW (6.5%), or P-LBW (42.6%). Adherence rates were 92.7% in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and 95.2% in the well-baby nursery with initial CSTS failure rates of 6.1% and 9.9%, respectively. Adherence was lowest among T-LBW (80.7%) compared to PTM (95.1%) or P-LBW (92.2%) infants in the NICU (p < 0.001) and well-baby nursery (81.6%, 96.7% and 97.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). In bivariate analyses, gestational age, birth weight, insurance, race, hospital type, discharge year, and preferred language were associated with adherence. In fully-adjusted models, adherence was positively associated with lower gestational age, higher birth weight, non-Medicaid insurance, and later discharge year (NICU) and lower gestational age and later discharge year (well-baby nursery). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence was lower for T-LBW than PTM or P-LBW infants, despite similar CSTS failure rates. Disparities in adherence among Medicaid-insured patients in the NICU warrant further study. Future studies are needed to clarify the benefit of CSTS and increase adherence in high-risk populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10995-021-03220-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8369874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83698742021-08-17 Adherence to Car Seat Tolerance Screening Differs by Indication and Patient Characteristics McLaurin-Jiang, Skyler Weinberger, Morris Ritter, Victor O’Shea, T. Michael Flower, Kori B. Matern Child Health J Article OBJECTIVES: To assess whether adherence to institutional car seat tolerance screening (CSTS) guidelines differed for infants born preterm (PTM), term low birth weight (T-LBW), or both preterm and low birth weight (P-LBW), and to examine the association between CSTS adherence and patient characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Within two large academic and community hospitals, we retrospectively reviewed all infants meeting institutional criteria (< 37 weeks’ gestation and/or < 2.27 kg) for CSTS from 2014 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association of patient characteristics with institutional CSTS guideline adherence. RESULTS: 4374 eligible infants were born PTM (50.9%), T-LBW (6.5%), or P-LBW (42.6%). Adherence rates were 92.7% in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and 95.2% in the well-baby nursery with initial CSTS failure rates of 6.1% and 9.9%, respectively. Adherence was lowest among T-LBW (80.7%) compared to PTM (95.1%) or P-LBW (92.2%) infants in the NICU (p < 0.001) and well-baby nursery (81.6%, 96.7% and 97.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). In bivariate analyses, gestational age, birth weight, insurance, race, hospital type, discharge year, and preferred language were associated with adherence. In fully-adjusted models, adherence was positively associated with lower gestational age, higher birth weight, non-Medicaid insurance, and later discharge year (NICU) and lower gestational age and later discharge year (well-baby nursery). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence was lower for T-LBW than PTM or P-LBW infants, despite similar CSTS failure rates. Disparities in adherence among Medicaid-insured patients in the NICU warrant further study. Future studies are needed to clarify the benefit of CSTS and increase adherence in high-risk populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10995-021-03220-5. Springer US 2021-08-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8369874/ /pubmed/34403071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03220-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
McLaurin-Jiang, Skyler
Weinberger, Morris
Ritter, Victor
O’Shea, T. Michael
Flower, Kori B.
Adherence to Car Seat Tolerance Screening Differs by Indication and Patient Characteristics
title Adherence to Car Seat Tolerance Screening Differs by Indication and Patient Characteristics
title_full Adherence to Car Seat Tolerance Screening Differs by Indication and Patient Characteristics
title_fullStr Adherence to Car Seat Tolerance Screening Differs by Indication and Patient Characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to Car Seat Tolerance Screening Differs by Indication and Patient Characteristics
title_short Adherence to Car Seat Tolerance Screening Differs by Indication and Patient Characteristics
title_sort adherence to car seat tolerance screening differs by indication and patient characteristics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03220-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mclaurinjiangskyler adherencetocarseattolerancescreeningdiffersbyindicationandpatientcharacteristics
AT weinbergermorris adherencetocarseattolerancescreeningdiffersbyindicationandpatientcharacteristics
AT rittervictor adherencetocarseattolerancescreeningdiffersbyindicationandpatientcharacteristics
AT osheatmichael adherencetocarseattolerancescreeningdiffersbyindicationandpatientcharacteristics
AT flowerkorib adherencetocarseattolerancescreeningdiffersbyindicationandpatientcharacteristics